Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Intravenous Morphine in the Treatment of Severe Painful Sickle Cell Crises in Children

September 20, 2018 updated by: University College Dublin

Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Intravenous Morphine in the Emergency Department Treatment of Severe Painful Sickle Cell Crises in Children

Sickle cell anaemia is an inherited blood disorder which results in abnormal sickle shaped red blood cells which do not fit well through small blood vessels. These blockages prevent oxygen (in blood) from reaching different parts of the body resulting in painful crisis. This study will compare the effectiveness of two types of pain medication, one given through a vein and one squirted up the nose.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) frequently and unpredictably present to the emergency department (ED) with pain. The painful event is the hallmark acute clinical manifestation of SCD, characterised by sudden onset and is usually bony in origin. This study aims to establish if 1.5mcg/kg of intranasal fentanyl (INF; administered via a Mucosal Atomiser Device, MAD™) is non-inferior to intravenous morphine 0.1 mg/kg in severe SCD-associated pain.

This study is a randomised,double-blind, double-dummy active control trial of children (weighing more than 10 kg) between 1 year and 21 years of age with severe painful sickle cell crisis. Severe pain is defined as rated seven or greater on a 0 to 10 age-appropriate numeric pain scale or equivalent. The trial will be conducted in a single tertiary urban paediatric ED in Dublin, Ireland. Each patient will receive a single active agent and a single placebo via the intravenous and intranasal routes. All clinical and research staff, patients and parents will be blinded to the treatment allocation. The primary endpoint is severity of pain scored at 10 min from administration of the study medications. Secondary endpoints include pain severity measured at 0, 5, 15, 20, 30, 60 and 120 min after the administration of analgesia, proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia and incidence of adverse events. The trial ends at 120 min after the administration of the study drugs. A clinically meaningful difference in validated pain scores has been defined as 13 mm. Setting the permitted threshold to 50% of this limit (6 mm) and assuming both treatments are on average equal, a sample size of 30 patients (15 per group) will provide at least 80% power to demonstrate that INF is non-inferior to IV morphine with a level of significance of 0.05.

This clinical trial will inform of the role of INF 1.5mcg/kg via MAD in the acute treatment of severe painful sickle cell crisis in children in the ED setting.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

31

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dublin, Ireland
        • Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Crumlin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 21 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages 1 - 21 years
  • Weight ≥10 kg and ≤70 kg
  • Known sickle cell disease presenting with severe pain
  • Written informed consent, ideally from both parents (and assent, where appropriate), obtained prior to painful crisis (for example, in Haematology clinic)
  • Verbal consent (and assent, where appropriate) obtained at the time of the painful crisis in the ED
  • Hospital admission required for painful crisis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has received parenteral narcotic analgesic within 4 hours of ED presentation
  • Oxygen saturations below 95% on initial assessment
  • Altered conscious state as defined by a Glasgow Coma score less than 15
  • Contraindications to fentanyl/morphine usage
  • Inability to secure IV access
  • Patient has participated in another clinical trial involving an Investigation Medicinal Product (IMP) within 4 weeks of dosing, or is currently enrolled in another clinical trial involving an IMP, or has been previously enrolled in this trial
  • Patients who have any condition that would make him/her, in the opinion of the Investigator or Sponsor, unsuitable for the study, or who are, in the opinion of the Investigator, not likely to complete the study for any reason
  • Blocked or traumatised nose

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Active Intranasal Fentanyl
Subjects will receive 50 μg/ml intranasal fentanyl citrate and a placebo matched to intravenous morphine (1 ml water for injection) at time 0
50 μg/ml fentanyl citrate (Sublimaze, Janssen Cilag, Ltd, Marketing Authorisation No. PA 0748/044/001) administered intranasally using the MAD Nasal Intranasal Mucosal Atomiser Device
Other Names:
  • Fentanyl
  • Sublimaze
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Active IV Morphine
Subjects will receive 10 mg/ml intravenous morphine sulphate and a placebo matched to intranasal fentanyl (2 ml water)
10 mg/ml Morphine sulphate BP (Antigen Pharmaceuticals, Marketing Authorisation No.PA 73/20/1) administered intravenously.
Other Names:
  • Morphine
  • Morphine sulfate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score as measured using the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale and Manchester Pain Ruler.
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Severity of pain as measured using a validated pain score (visual analogue scale) at 10 minutes after administration of the intervention. The the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale and Manchester Pain Ruler will be used as age-appropriate pain scales for pre-verbal/early verbal children and older verbal children respectively.
10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score as measured using the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale and Manchester Pain Ruler.
Time Frame: 0, 5, 15, 20, 30, 60 and 120 minutes
Severity of pain as measured using a validated pain score (visual analogue scale) at 0, 5, 15, 20, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after administration of the intervention. The the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale and Manchester Pain Ruler will be used as age-appropriate pain scales for pre-verbal/early verbal children and older verbal children respectively.
0, 5, 15, 20, 30, 60 and 120 minutes
The proportion of participants requiring rescue opioid requirement.
Time Frame: 120 minutes
The proportion of patients requiring rescue opioid analgesia.
120 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 12, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 14, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 14, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 24, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Fentanyl Citrate

Subscribe