- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03714282
Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation in Stroke
Locomotor Function Following Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation in Individuals With Hemiplegic Stroke
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES:
- To determine whether transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation combined with ambulation training modulates corticospinal locomotor networks in individuals with chronic hemiplegic stroke
- To determine whether transcutaneous spinal stimulation combined with ambulation training improves locomotor function in individuals with chronic hemiplegic stroke
- To determine whether transcutaneous spinal stimulation combined with ambulation training improves symmetry of gait in individuals with chronic hemiplegic stroke
- To determine whether transcutaneous spinal stimulation combined with ambulation training improves standing posture and balance in individuals with chronic hemiplegic stroke
- To determine whether ambulation efficiency (improved cardiovascular conditioning) improves with transcutaneous non-invasive spinal stimulation and locomotor training in individuals with chronic hemiplegic stroke
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Healthy Control Group Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 or older
- Able and willing to give written consent and comply with study procedures
Healthy Control Group Exclusion Criteria:
- No history of cerebrovascular accidents or neurological degenerative pathologies (such as multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, etc.)
- Pregnant or nursing
- Skin allergies or irritation; open wounds
- Utilizing a powered, implanted cardiac device for monitoring or supporting heart function (i.e. pacemaker, defibrillator, or LVAD)
Stroke Group Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants are 18 years of age or older
- Participants are at least 4 weeks post stroke
- Participants with hemiplegia secondary to a single stroke
- Functional Ambulation Category of 2 or greater - Patient needs continuous or intermittent support of one person to help with balance and coordination.
- Participants are able to provide informed consent
- Participants are not currently receiving regular physical therapy services
Stroke Group Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals less than18 years of age
- Individuals less than 4 weeks post stroke
- Individuals with ataxia
- Individuals with multiple stroke history
- Currently taking a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) or Tricyclic antidepressant (TCA)
- Botox injection in lower extremity within the last 4 months
- Modified Ashworth score of 3 or greater in lower extremity
- Pregnancy or nursing
- Pacemaker or anti-spasticity implantable pumps
- Active pressure sores
- Unhealed bone fractures
- Peripheral neuropathies
- Painful musculoskeletal dysfunction due to active injuries or infections
- Severe contractures in the lower extremities
- Medical illness limiting the ability to walk
- Active urinary tract infection
- Clinically significant depression, psychiatric disorders, or ongoing drug abuse
- Metal implants in their spine TMS Specific Criteria (see Safety Screening Questionnaire for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation)
- Medicated with agents known to increase (e.g., amphetamines) or decrease motor system excitability (e.g., lorazepam)
- Implanted cardiac pacemaker
- Metal implants in the head or face
- Suffers unexplained, recurring headaches
- Had a seizure in the past unrelated to the stroke event, or has epilepsy
- Skull abnormalities or fractures
- Suffered a concussion within the last 6 month
- Cardiorespiratory or metabolic diseases (e.g. cardiac arrhythmia, uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes, chronic emphysema)
- Pregnant
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Noninvasive Spinal Stimulation with Gait Training
May receive up to 50 min of locomotion training with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.
However, the amount of time spent in side-lying locomotion training, treadmill training and overground training will depend on individual tolerance and progression.
|
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Neurostimulator will deliver transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation while subjects perform locomotor activities.
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional Gait Training
May receive up to 50 min of locomotion training without transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.
However, the amount of time spent in side-lying locomotion training, treadmill training and overground training will depend on individual tolerance and progression.
|
May receive up to 50 min of locomotion training without transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.
However, the amount of time spent in side-lying locomotion training, treadmill training and overground training will depend on individual tolerance and progression.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Step-length Symmetry Using Symmetry Index
Time Frame: Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
|
Participants will ambulate along Gait Rite electronic walkway to evaluate baseline gait pattern at both their self-selected and safe fast gait speed.
The GAITRite electronic walkway for the study shall be a minimum of 14 feet long.
The GAITRite data capture was chosen as measurement of the patient's overall gait quality.
The gait symmetry index of spatio-temporal parameters will be calculated as (100%×(1-|1-Nonparetic/(Paretic side)|), which always results in a maximum value of 100%, irrespective of which limb demonstrates greater values, with improvements observed as positive values.
Higher scores = better outcome.
|
Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
|
|
Change in Swing-time Symmetry
Time Frame: Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
|
Participants will ambulate along Gait Rite electronic walkway to evaluate baseline gait pattern at both their self-selected and safe fast gait speed.
The GAITRite electronic walkway for the study shall be a minimum of 14 feet long.
The GAITRite data capture was chosen as measurement of the patient's overall gait quality.
The gait symmetry index of spatio-temporal parameters will be calculated as (100%×(1-|1-Nonparetic/(Paretic side)|), which always results in a maximum value of 100%, irrespective of which limb demonstrates greater values, with improvements observed as positive values.
Higher scores = better outcome.
|
Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in 10 Meter Walk Test - Self-selected Velocity
Time Frame: Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
|
This test will examine the patient's gait speed.
Patients will be directed to walk at their preferred and maximum but safe speed.
Patients will be positioned 1 meter before the start line and instructed to walk the entire distance and past the end line approximately 1 meter.
The distance before and after the course are meant to minimize the effect of acceleration and deceleration.
Time will be recorded using a stopwatch and recorded to the one hundredth of a second (ex: 2.15 sec).
|
Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
|
|
Change in 10 Meter Walk Test - Fast Velocity
Time Frame: Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
|
This test will examine the patient's gait speed.
Patients will be directed to walk at their preferred and maximum but safe speed.
Patients will be positioned 1 meter before the start line and instructed to walk the entire distance and past the end line approximately 1 meter.
The distance before and after the course are meant to minimize the effect of acceleration and deceleration.
Time will be recorded using a stopwatch and recorded to the one hundredth of a second (ex: 2.15 sec).
|
Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
|
|
Change in 6 Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
|
The 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) measures the distance a subject can walk indoors on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes, using assistive devices, as necessary.
The test is a reliable and valid evaluation of functional exercise capacity and is used as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity and endurance.
The test will be used to determine participant's gait efficiency at baseline and at study completion.
The walk test is patient self-paced and assesses the level of functional capacity.
Patients are allowed to stop and rest during the test, however, the timer does not stop.
If the patient is unable to complete the time, the time stopped is noted and reason for stopping prematurely is recorded.
|
Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
|
|
Change in PCI During 6 Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
|
Participants completed the 6MWT as heart rate was recorded throughout the testing using a Polar H7 chest belt monitor.
Prior to beginning the 6MWT, average resting heart rate was recorded for two minutes while the subject was seated and quiet.
Cardiac efficiency during 6MWT was measured by physiological cost index (PCI), which reflects heart rate per meter walked.
Reduced PCI indicates improved cardiac efficiency.
|
Pre and Post intervention (8 weeks of training, Post = after all training sessions completed. 3 training sessions/week x8 weeks = 24 sessions total)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Gait Symmetry on Treadmill
Time Frame: Session 1 (baseline test, initial visit), Midpoint, Post intervention, 3 month follow-up, 6 month follow-up, 12 month follow-up
|
Participants will ambulate on the treadmill for up to 10 minutes in order to obtain spatiotemporal measures of gait and to obtain gait kinematics during treadmill locomotion
|
Session 1 (baseline test, initial visit), Midpoint, Post intervention, 3 month follow-up, 6 month follow-up, 12 month follow-up
|
|
Change in Dynamic Balance
Time Frame: Session 1 (baseline test, initial visit), Midpoint, Post intervention, 3 month follow-up, 6 month follow-up, 12 month follow-up
|
During the dynamic stability test, the ability to voluntarily displace the COP to a maximum distance without losing balance will be assessed (Limits of stability (LOS) test). The participant will be instructed to lean forward, backward, left, and right, hold the position for ~5 seconds and return back to the initial/center position. The AMTI Force System from Water Town, MA will be used to assess balance. |
Session 1 (baseline test, initial visit), Midpoint, Post intervention, 3 month follow-up, 6 month follow-up, 12 month follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Arun Jayaraman, PT, PhD, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STU00206430
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, EmbolicUnited States
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaRecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke PatientThailand
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusScuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus...Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke IschemicItaly
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | ExoskeletonSouth Korea
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
Clinical Trials on Noninvasive spinal stimulation with gait training
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabUniversity of California, Los AngelesRecruiting
-
University of WashingtonSeattle Children's HospitalRecruitingCerebral Palsy | Neurological DisorderUnited States
-
Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger...CompletedSpinal Cord InjuriesUnited States
-
Medical College of WisconsinMarquette University; Froedtert Hospital; Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin EndowmentNot yet recruitingDegenerative Cervical MyelopathyUnited States
-
Maria Knikou, PT, MBA, PhDRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries (Complete and Incomplete)United States
-
University of British ColumbiaProvidence Health & Services; International Spinal Research Trust; International...RecruitingSexual Dysfunction, Physiological | Spinal Cord Injuries | Neurogenic Bowel | Neurogenic Bladder | Spinal Cord StimulationCanada
-
University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of California, Los AngelesWithdrawnOveractive Bladder | Neurogenic Bladder | Incontinence, UrgeUnited States
-
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation...MitacsNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Gait Disorder, Sensorimotor | Gait Disorders | Locomotion | Spinal Cord Injury SubacuteCanada
-
Laval UniversityUnknownTobacco Use DisorderCanada
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterNot yet recruitingStroke | Chronic Stroke Patients | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsUnited States