Protocolized Ventilator Weaning Verses Usual Care

October 28, 2018 updated by: Amir Vahedian-Azimi, Baqiyatallah Medical Sciences University

Protocolized Ventilator Weaning Verses Usual Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Protocol-driven ventilator weaning strategies utilizing spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) reportedly result in shorter intubation duration and intensive care unit (ICU) length-of-stay (LOS). Investigators compared respiratory therapy (RT)-driven protocolized ventilator weaning (PW) verses usual care (UC) as it pertains to physiologic respiratory parameters, intubation duration, extubation success/reintubation rates, and ICU LOS. The study was a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial in 6 ICUs at 6 academic-affiliated hospitals in a resource limited setting. Extubation readiness was determined by the attending physician (UC) or the respiratory therapist (PW) using pre-defined criteria and SBT. Physiologic variables, serial blood gas measurements, and weaning indices were assessed including rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), negative inspiratory force (NIF), occlusion pressure (P0.1), dynamic and static compliance (Cdyn and Cs).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This was a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial in 6 closed ICUs with 24/7 in-house intensivist coverage at 6 academic-affiliated medical centers in a resource limited setting from October 18, 2007 to May 03, 2014. All parts of the study were reviewed according to the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement. Crossover was not allowed. Participants were blinded to randomization group, as were the healthcare providers and statistician. Randomization was accomplished using Random Allocation Software© (RAS; Informer Technologies, Inc.). Block randomization was performed by a computer generated random number list prepared by a statistician. Allocation consignment occurred through confidential communication between the patient's nurse and a third party not involved in recruitment. The data analyzer was blinded to group randomization and was not present during ventilator weaning. There were no important changes to methods after trial commencement. The study ended because it achieved the necessary sample size.

Pparticipants were randomly assigned to ventilator weaning either by protocolized methodology or by usual care (UC). All patients were ventilated using Dräger Evita® XL or Evita® 4 ventilators (Dräeger Medical, Inc., Lubeck, Germany). In the PW group, weaning and extubation readiness was determined by the RT using pre-defined criteria and the result of a SBT. Pre-defined weaning criteria included: (1) patent upper airway; (2) ability to protect airway (defined by mental status and presence of adequate gag and cough reflexes); (3) ability to clear secretions; (4) decreasing secretion burden requiring suction not more frequently than every 2 hours; (5) level of support (FiO2 < 50%, PEEP = 5); and (6) hemodynamic stability not requiring chemical (vasopressors, inotropes) or mechanical (e.g. intra-aortic balloon pump, extracorporeal life support) circulatory support. Until the SBT, management of each group was the same. For patients in the UC group, SBT type and determination to extubate was determined by attending physician preference. For participants in the PW group, the SBT type was protocol determined, and extubation decisions were driven by RT. The SBT consisted of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of 5 mmHg with an FiO2 ≤ 0.4. After 3-minutes patients were assessed for appropriateness to continue the SBT by arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) ≥ 92% without arrhythmias, and a rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI = RR/VT) < 105 breaths/min/L. Specified signs of respiratory distress included respiratory rate (RR)> 30 breaths/minute, SaO2< 90%, heart rate (HR)> 140 breaths/minute, or a sustained increase or decrease of HR of >20%, systolic blood pressure >200 mmHg or <80 mmHg, or agitation, anxiety, or diaphoresis without other identified cause. The SBT was performed for 120 min in accordance with prior studies. At the end of the SBT, the RSBI was re-measured and an arterial blood gas (ABG) was obtained.

In the UC group, the SBT type and extubation decision was determined by the attending intensivist on service based upon neurologic status, airway competence (gag, cough, suction requirements), and negative inspiratory force (NIF) or RSBI measurements. Extubation success was defined as remaining extubated for 48 hours without need for re-intubation or other forms of non-invasive MV.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admitted to the ICU
  • Endotracheally intubated on mechanical ventilation ≥ 24 hours
  • Full-code status
  • Informed consent provided by the patient, legal guardian, or healthcare surrogate (prior to ventilator weaning).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Declining consent
  • Death without ventilator weaning
  • Cardiopulmonary arrest on the ventilator
  • Permanent ventilator dependence
  • Tracheostomy placement for long-term weaning
  • Self-extubation
  • Pulmonary edema
  • Aspiration during the wean
  • Copious secretions and mucus plugging precluding wean
  • Severe obstructive lung disease
  • COPD with hypercapneic respiratory failure
  • Status-post-respiratory arrest
  • Concurrent neurologic / neuromuscular comorbidity
  • Drug or alcohol intoxication
  • Incomplete data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Protocolized Wean
Respiratory therapist determined extubation readiness based on: patent and protected airway; adequate secretion clearance; suction requirement ≤ every 2 hours; FiO2 < 50% and PEEP = 5; and hemodynamic stability without circulatory support. The SBT included CPAP = 5 mmHg at FiO2 ≤ 0.4. Patients were assessed after 3-minutes for appropriateness to continue (SaO2 ≥ 92%; no arrhythmia; RSBI < 105 breaths/min/L). Respiratory distress signs included RR > 30 breaths/min, SaO2< 90%, HR > 140 beats/min, or a sustained change in HR of >20%, systolic BP >200 mmHg or <80 mmHg, or agitation, anxiety, or diaphoresis without other cause. The SBT lasted 120 min in accordance with prior studies. Upon SBT completion, the RSBI was re-measured and an ABG was obtained.
Respiratory therapist determined extubation readiness based on: patent and protected airway; adequate secretion clearance; suction requirement ≤ every 2 hours; FiO2 < 50% and PEEP = 5; and hemodynamic stability without circulatory support. The SBT included CPAP = 5 mmHg at FiO2 ≤ 0.4. Patients were assessed after 3-minutes for appropriateness to continue (SaO2 ≥ 92%; no arrhythmia; RSBI < 105 breaths/min/L). Respiratory distress signs included RR > 30 breaths/min, SaO2< 90%, HR > 140 beats/min, or a sustained change in HR of >20%, systolic BP >200 mmHg or <80 mmHg, or agitation, anxiety, or diaphoresis without other cause. The SBT lasted 120 min in accordance with prior studies. Upon SBT completion, the RSBI was re-measured and an ABG was obtained.
No Intervention: Usual Care
In the UC group, the SBT type and extubation decision was determined by the attending intensivist on service based upon neurologic status, airway competence (gag, cough, suction requirements), and negative inspiratory force (NIF) or RSBI measurements.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of Intubation
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 30 days
Duration of mechanical ventilation
through study completion, an average of 30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital length-of-stay
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 30 days
Hospital length-of-stay
through study completion, an average of 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 18, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 3, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BUMS-PWvUC-RCT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Protocolized wean

3
Subscribe