Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound and Molecular Analysis in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cyst

Prospective Analysis About the Utility of Contrast Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound and Molecular Analysis in the Study of Pancreatic Cyst

This study evaluates the use of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) and cyst fluid molecular analysis in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cysts and the detection of malignancy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Pancreatic cyst are a frequent finding on cross-sectional imaging on general population. They are identified in up to 3% of the abdominal computed tomographies (CT) and 20% of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed for other reasons but the risk of malignancy in pancreatic cysts discovered incidentally is low, representing 1-5% of the total malignant pancreatic neoplasms.

Pancreatic cysts are a broad group of pancreatic lesions that can be divided into benign and premalignant or malignant lesions. Pseudocyst and serous cystic neoplasm (SCN) don´t have malignant potential while others like mucinous cysts are premalignant lesions. But not all mucinous neoplasms have the same risk of malignancy. According to recent publications mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) have a potential for malignancy of around 15%, main duct intrapapillary mucinous neoplasm (MD-IPMN) of 62% and branch duct IPMN (BD-IPMN) of 25%. The correct identification of these premalignant lesions will allow to optimize the treatment and follow-up of these patients, but in many cases it is difficult to accurately differentiate between different types of cysts and their risk of malignancy. The differentiation between lmucinous and non-mucinous cysts is suboptimal, with diagnostic accuracy for CT and MRI of 61% and 50-73% with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The endosonographic characteristics that have been related with malignancy are the size larger than 3 cm, the presence of a solid component, wall thickening, Wirsung dilation, abrupt change of the size of the main pancreatic duct with distal atrophy of the gland and the presence of lymphadenopathies. However, endosonographic characteristics are not sufficient as an individual predictor of malignancy.

The puncture of the cyst and fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with biochemical and cytological assessment is generally indicated to differentiate between cysts and to asses for malignancy. The determination of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and amylase have low specificity for the detection of malignancy and for mucinous cyst, and the cytological assessment is highly specific but lacks of sensibility (50%). So further methods are requested for an adequate detection of premalignant and malignant cyst.

Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound uses an ultrasonographic contrast agent to visualize blood flow in fine vessels and may aid in the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts by enabling assessment of the vascularization of structures such as cyst walls, septa, or mural nodules. Furthermore it allows the correct differentiation between contrast-enhanced mural nodules, that predict for malignancy, from non-enhancing mucus clots.

The molecular analysis of cyst fluid may detect mutations that are associated with premalignant cyst and with malignancy. Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) gene has been related with mucinous cyst while von Hippel-Lindau gene (VHL) is present in serous cyst.

This study evaluates the use of contrast-enhanced EUS and the molecular analysis for pancreatic cyst diagnosis and malignant detection, and if their use may modify cyst management.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28006
        • Hospital Universitario de La Princesa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients with with an imaging diagnosing pancreatic cystic neoplasm, older than 18 years old, that come to our unit during the 18 months of the study without exclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indeterminate pancreatic cyst > 2cm
  • Pancreatic cyst > 1cm with morphological diagnosis suspicious to be mucinous etiology
  • Suitable for endoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication for endoscopy
  • Active anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy
  • Thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy in the absence of its correction prior to the procedure
  • Abscence of informed consent
  • Extrapancreatic cyst
  • Known pancreatic pseudocyst

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mutations in pancreatic cystic neoplasm
Time Frame: Baseline
Number and type of mutations that are present on the molecular analysis of premalignant and malignant mucinous cyst.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison between morphological criteria and cyst fluid analysis
Time Frame: Baseline
To evaluate the correlation between morphological diagnosis made by endoscopic ultrasound and diagnosis made by cyst fluid analysis (biochemical, cytological and molecular)
Baseline
Increase power diagnosis with contrast-enhanced EUS
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of pancreatic cyst that can be correctly diagnosed with contrast-enhanced EUS compared to EUS alone
Baseline
Security of EUS fine-needle aspiration
Time Frame: 7 days
Number of adverse events that happen during or 7 days after de procedure
7 days
Relation between pancreatic fluid and serum molecular analysis
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of mutations that are present in both pancreatic cyst fluid and serum or only in cyst fluid
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RHerranz
  • FdelaMorena (Other Identifier: HUPrincesa)
  • CSantander (Other Identifier: HUPrincesa)
  • PMajano (Other Identifier: HUPrincesa)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Cyst

3
Subscribe