Diuretic Effect of Metolazone Pre-dosing Versus Concurrent Dosing

September 25, 2021 updated by: Brent Reed, University of Maryland, Baltimore

Diuretic Effect of Metolazone Pre-dosing Versus Concurrent Dosing With Furosemide: a Pilot Study

The purpose of this study is to examine whether administering metolazone 60 minutes prior to furosemide increases urine output compared with administering metolazone and furosemide concomitantly. Participants will have equal chance of being assigned to each group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Diuretic resistance is common among patients with acute decompensated heart failure, and one strategy for overcoming this phenomenon is sequential nephron blockade with loop plus thiazide-type diuretics. Metolazone is an oral thiazide-type diuretic commonly used for this purpose. Due to its delayed absorption, some clinicians suggest that metolazone be given 30-60 minutes prior to the loop diuretic. However, the efficacy and safety of such a strategy has not been investigated despite its added complexity. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether pre-dosing with metolazone confers a difference in efficacy and safety compared to administering it at the same time as furosemide.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • University of Maryland Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 87 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admission within 48 hours for acute decompensated heart failure with at least one symptom and one sign of volume overload
  • Receipt of loop diuretic prior to admission
  • Plan to administer furosemide 120 - 160 mg IV bolus twice daily over the next 24 hours with additional diuresis deemed necessary
  • If patient is concurrently administered intravenous vasodilator or inotrope, the dose of vasodilator or inotrope must be stable for 6 hours prior to enrollment with a plan to continue the same dose for the 24 hour duration of this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metolazone prescribed prior to admission
  • Receipt of continuous intravenous infusion of furosemide
  • Cirrhosis or end stage renal disease
  • Non-English speaking patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Metolazone Pre-dosing
Metolazone 5 mg by mouth administered 60 minutes prior to furosemide background therapy (120 - 160 mg intravenous bolus, followed by furosemide 120 - 160 mg intravenous bolus 12 - 24 hours after)
All patients will receive furosemide background therapy (furosemide 120 - 160 mg IV bolus dosed twice within a twenty four hour period. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to either metolazone 5 mg tablet dosed 60 minutes prior to first dose of furosemide or metolazone dosed concurrently (within ten minute time frame) with the first dose of furosemide.
Other Names:
  • Zaroxolyn
Active Comparator: Metolazone Concurrent Dosing
Metolazone 5 mg by mouth administered at the same time as furosemide background therapy (120 - 160 mg intravenous bolus, followed by furosemide 120 - 160 mg intravenous bolus 12 - 24 hours after)
All patients will receive furosemide background therapy (furosemide 120 - 160 mg IV bolus dosed twice within a twenty four hour period. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to either metolazone 5 mg tablet dosed 60 minutes prior to first dose of furosemide or metolazone dosed concurrently (within ten minute time frame) with the first dose of furosemide.
Other Names:
  • Zaroxolyn

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
24-Hour Urine Output
Time Frame: 24 hours
Total measured urine output in milliliters produced after metolazone dose is given
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Total Body Weight
Time Frame: Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose
Change in total body weight from baseline value measured prior to metolazone dose to value collected after metolazone dose
Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose
Change in Serum Creatinine
Time Frame: Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose
Change in serum creatinine from baseline value collected prior to metolazone dose to value collected after metolazone dose
Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose
Acute Kidney Injury
Time Frame: Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose
Portion of patients with increase in serum creatinine by ≥ 0.3 mg/dL or ≥ 50% from baseline
Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose
Hypokalemia
Time Frame: Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose
Proportion of patients with potassium level less than 4.0 mEq/L measured after metolazone dose is given
Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose
Hypomagnesemia
Time Frame: Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose
Proportion of patients with magnesium level less than 2.0 mg/dL measured after metolazone dose is given
Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose
Hyponatremia
Time Frame: Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose
Proportion of patients with serum sodium level less than 135 mg/dL measured after metolazone dose is given
Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brent Reed, PharmD, University of Maryland, College Park

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fluid Overload

Clinical Trials on Metolazone 60 minutes prior to furosemide

3
Subscribe