Ipratropium Bromide Spray as Treatment for Sialorrhea in Children

November 19, 2018 updated by: Peng You, London Health Sciences Centre

Ipratropium Bromide Spray as Treatment for Sialorrhea in Children: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Crossover Study

Double-blind, clinical trial investigating the effects of ipratropium spray versus placebo spray in children with sialorrhea

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Excess drooling, or sialorrhea, is a chronic problem seen in pediatric patients with oral-motor dysfunction or neurodevelopmental abnormalities. Despite significant social and physical detriment from sialorrhea, an effective and safe treatment remains elusive.

The investigator's objective is to study the effect of sublingual ipratropium (an anticholinergic aerosol spray) on sialorrhea in the pediatric population

Method: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over trial of sublingual ipratropium bromide application in pediatric patients with inappropriate drooling. Patients are recruited from the sialorrhea clinic and informed consent is obtained. Patients are randomized to receive ipratropium bromide, 1- 2 metered doses (sprays) of active drug (21 micrograms per metered dose) or matching placebo, every 6 hours up to a maximum of 4 times per day, in a double-blind, cross-over design using randomization tables. Total treatment length is two weeks for each limb of the study with a 2 week washout period. The primary outcome measure is the reporting of sialorrhea using a validated scales. Secondary outcome includes global assessment of treatment, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 16 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children and adolescents aged 5-18 with a history of excessive drooling

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known hypersensitivity to ipratropium bromide
  • surgery for sialorrhea within one year
  • the concurrent use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, cholinergic agents, or anticholinergic agents
  • botulinum toxin for drooling within the preceding six months
  • a history of glaucoma
  • the presence of clinically significant urinary retention or outflow obstruction as evidenced by patient history or documented urodynamic studies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
ipratropium bromide administered via metered dose spray (21 micrograms per spray). 1-2 spray sublingual or to buccal mucosa every 6 hours up to 4 times a day
ipratropium bromide via metered dose spray (21 micrograms per spray)
Other Names:
  • Atrovent
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
normal saline administered via metered dose spray. 1-2 spray sublingual or to buccal mucosa every 6 hours up to 4 times a day
normal saline delivered via metered dose spray

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline sialorrhea at 2 weeks following each treatment arm
Also referred to as the Thomas Stonell and Greenberg scale. This is a validated tool using patient reported scores for drooling severity and frequency. Drooling severity is scored on a scale with minimum value of 1 and maximum value of 5. A higher value represents a worse outcome. The frequency is scored on a scale with minimum value of 1 and maximum value of 4. A higher value represents a worse outcome. The subscales (severity and frequency) can be interpreted independently or combined through addition to compute a total score.
Change from baseline sialorrhea at 2 weeks following each treatment arm
Change in Drooling impact scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline sialorrhea at 2 weeks following each treatment arm
The drooling impact scale is a validated self-administered questionnaire used to measure saliva-control in children. The scale consists of 10 questions/subscales, each with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 10. For all subscales, the higher value represents a worse outcome. The total score is reported and is calculated by adding the score of all 10 subscales.
Change from baseline sialorrhea at 2 weeks following each treatment arm

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Global Impression of Improvement Scale
Time Frame: At start of trial and weekly self recording up to 8 weeks
The Patient Global Impression of improvement scale is a single 7-point scale that requires the patient/caregiver to assess how much the illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. The minimum score is 1 and the maximum score is 7. A higher value represents a worse outcome. To be collected through patient booklet
At start of trial and weekly self recording up to 8 weeks
Adverse effect
Time Frame: Intermittent up to 8 weeks
Documentation of all adverse effects encountered during study period
Intermittent up to 8 weeks
Patient feedback
Time Frame: Weekly self recording up to 8 weeks.
Open ended patient comment related to the intervention. To be collected through patient booklet
Weekly self recording up to 8 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julie Strychowsky, MD, London Health Science Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sialorrhea

Clinical Trials on Ipratropium bromide

3
Subscribe