Recovernow: Tablet-Based Speech Therapy For Post-Stroke Aphasia

April 11, 2022 updated by: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Recovernow: A Multicentre Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Of Early Mobile Tablet-Based Speech Therapy For Acute Stroke Patients With Aphasia

RECOVERNOW is A MULTICENTRE PHASE II RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF EARLY MOBILE TABLET-BASED SPEECH THERAPY FOR ACUTE STROKE PATIENTS WITH APHASIA. Using a novel futility design, investigators will randomize acute care in-patients with stroke to mobile tablet-based speech therapy applications vs the standard of care. Primary outcome is improvement in the Western Aphasia Battery Aphasia (WAB-R)

Overall Study Aim: The primary study aim is to determine the futility and potential efficacy of mobile tablet-based speech therapy for post stroke aphasia.

Primary Endpoint: The primary outcome measure is change in the Aphasia quotient (AQ) from the WAB-R at 90 days. The WAB-R is a standardized aphasia battery. The AQ is calculated from four language sub-tests measuring spontaneous speech, word comprehension, repetition, and word finding.)

Secondary Endpoints: The results of the cost-effectiveness analysis will be expressed as the incremental cost per one-unit improvement in AQ and the incremental cost per one quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

Population: 226 participants will be enrolled over 3 years. Males and females, >18 years of age, with diagnosis of acute ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by routine head computerized tomography (CT) scan with mild to moderate aphasia.

Phase: II

Number of Sites: It is anticipated that this will be a multi-center study, with the following facilities participating: The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta and Toronto Western Hospital.

Protocol Therapy: Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either tablets with speech therapy apps (intervention group) or standard of care.

Study Duration: It is estimated that recruitment will take place over 3 years in the three participating centers.

Subject Participation Duration: All patients will be assessed clinically at baseline and Day 90 (+/-10).

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Post-stroke aphasia is a major cause of disability. Aphasia is a heterogeneous condition and can manifest in a variety of communication impairments, including difficulty producing words or sentences and understanding spoken and/or written language. Compared to stroke patients without aphasia, patients with aphasia have longer hospital stays, more severe disability, greater nursing care dependency, are at a greater risk for depression, are discharged to long-term care more frequently, and are less likely to return to work, even when younger. When compared to non-aphasic patients with similar physical abilities, well-being and social supports, patients with aphasia engage in fewer instrumental activities of daily living (iADL) and report worse quality of life.

Investigators launched the RecoverNow research program in 2014 in an attempt to address the delays to access stroke rehabilitation from acute care centres. Our concept was to use mobile tablets to "bring rehab to the patient", and leverage the significant downtime experienced by stroke survivors in acute care. A pilot feasibility study using iPads to deliver speech therapy in the acute setting was started. In this study, our speech language pathologist (SLP) personalized the iPads by selecting commercially available speech therapy applications that specifically targeted the individual patients' deficits. Patients admitted to our stroke center underwent standard of care SLP assessments, and were then offered an iPad with instructions to work with the selected apps for a minimum of 1-hour a day. 30 patients in 6 months were enrolled, and demonstrated a recruitment rate of 68%, a retention rate of 97%, and an 83% adherence rate to a prescribed 1hour/day therapy regimen. Patients began using the tablet at a mean 6.8 days after stroke onset, for an average of 149.8 minutes/day throughout their inpatient stay. It was determined feasible to deliver speech therapy in the acute care setting using mobile tablets.

Based on these preliminary studies, the research group worked with the Ottawa Hospital Mobile Health Lab (mHealth) to refine the RecoverNow platform and develop a secure customizable Android operating system-based tablet. Briefly, this new platform is designed to be used by patients with post-stroke aphasia, meets all security requirements of health-care institutions, allows remote interaction between patients and SLPs, and allows patients to take the device with them as they transition from acute care to rehabilitation, home, or alternate levels of care.

In summary, it was shown that it is feasible to deliver speech therapy in the acute care setting using mobile tablets. The therapeutic intervention based on our experiences, the existing literature, and patient preferences was refined. The next step is to test the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of tablet-based speech therapy that begins in the acute care setting. It is proposed to begin with a pilot futility design, given the limited funding envelope for a clinical trial.

Using a novel futility design, this investigation will be Phase II clinical trial to test the potential efficacy of mobile tablet-based speech therapy for post stroke aphasia. Secondary objectives include a preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis and a capturing a variety of outcomes relevant to stroke recover to inform future studies and identify new opportunities for tablet-based therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4E9
        • The Ottawa Hospital
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4
        • University Health Network / University of Toronto

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke documented with CT and/or MRI and,
  • mild to moderate aphasia, and/or -) Scoring ≥ 1 on the Best Language parameters of the National Institute of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-existing speech, language or cognitive disorders (such as dementia, mild cognitive impairment),
  • severe debilitating disease(s) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude them from being able to complete the study to follow-up (ex: end-stage malignancy, ALS),
  • Severe comprehension deficits (unable to follow simple one-step commands and/or unable to respond to yes/no questions reliably), and
  • English is not the primary language
  • subarachnoid, subdural and epidural hemorrhages.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment arm
Tablet with speech therapy apps
Speech therapy apps loaded on tablets
No Intervention: Standard of Care
The standard care provided by speech language therapists.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Western Aphasia Battery (WAB-R) scores
Time Frame: 3 years
Is a diagnostic tool used to assess the linguistic skills and main nonlinguistic skills of adults with aphasia. This provides information for the diagnosis of the type of aphasia and identifies the location of the lesion causing aphasia.This score is a weighted composite of performance on 10 separate WAB subtests. Scores rate severity as follows: 0-25 is very severe, 26-50 is severe, 51-75 is moderate, and 76-above is mild
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 3 years
The results of the cost-effectiveness analysis will be expressed as the incremental cost per one-unit improvement in AQ and the incremental cost per one quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained
3 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale
Time Frame: 3 years
The Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) is an interview-administered self-report scale that is based on the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale. It is an acceptable, reliable, and valid measure of health-related quality of life in people with long-term aphasia. It's made up of 39 different quality of life questions on topics such as difficulties with understanding speech and the impact of language problems on family and social life in patients who have stroke-associated aphasia. The SAQOL-39 has two response formats, both based on a 5-point scale, where 1 means that the patient could not complete the task at all, and 5 means a task could be completed with no difficulty. The second response format is an agreement/disagreement 5-point scale with 1 meaning definitely yes and 5 meaning definitely no. The overall SAQOL-39 score is calculated by summing all items and dividing by the number of items.
3 years
Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI)
Time Frame: 3 years
The Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI) measures the functional communication for adults with aphasia both acutely and over time. It uses a 10 cm linear visual analogue scale that caregivers use to rate the efficacy of the patient in 16 situations, from 'not at all able' to 'as able as before the stroke.' Graders convert measurements of the marks on the scale to a score from 0-100. These scores are then averaged to obtain an overall score. Higher scores mean better capability in the patient in the assessed situations.
3 years
Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test-Plus (CLQT+)
Time Frame: 3 years
The Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test-Plus (CLQT+) is an individually-administered test designed to evaluate cognitive-linguistic functioning in individuals 18-89 years old who have an acquired neurological dysfunction. This test assesses the patient in attention, memory, language, executive functions, and visuospatial skills. The CLQT+ consists of 11 tasks: personal facts, symbol cancellation, confrontation naming, clock drawing, story retelling, symbol trails, generative naming, design memory, mazes, design generation, and semantic comprehension. The score for each task, except the clock drawing, contributes to a severity rating for one or more of the five domains. The severity ratings are mild, moderate, severe, and within normal limits. A total composite score of the severity ratings is then derived for each of the domains.
3 years
The 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: 3 years
The 5-level EQ-5D(EQ-5D-5L) is a self-completed questionnaire that assessed the self-reported wellness of a patient in 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression on a five-level scale: from no problems to extreme problems. These results are combinedto form a 5-digit number describing hte patient's general health. Additionally, there is a 20 cm visual analogue scale that asks the patient to make a mark where he or she feels she is, with the endpoints labelled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine'. The lower the mark, the worse the self-reported health.
3 years
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
Time Frame: 3 years

The NIH Stroke Scale is a widely used tool that was built to assess the cognitive effects of a stroke. In more scientific terms, it "provides a quantitative measure of stroke-related neurologic deficit".In a treatment setting, the scale has three major purposes:

It evaluates the severity of the stroke It helps determine the appropriate treatment It predicts patient outcomes.The scale is made up of 11 different elements that evaluate specific ability. The score for each ability is a number between 0 and 4, 0 being normal functioning and 4 being completely impaired. The patient's NIHSS score is calculated by adding the number for each element of the scale; 42 is the highest score possible and 0 is the lowest . In the NIHSS, the higher the score, the more impaired a stroke patient is.

3 years
Barthel index
Time Frame: 3 years
The Barthel index is an ordinal scale used to measure performance in activities of daily living (ADL). Each performance item is rated on this scale with a given number of points assigned to each level or ranking.[1] It uses ten variables describing ADL and mobility. A higher number is associated with a greater likelihood of being able to live at home with a degree of independence following discharge from hospital. The amount of time and physical assistance required to perform each item are used in determining the assigned value of each item. External factors within the environment affect the score of each item. If adaptations outside the standard home environment are met during assessment, the participant's score will be lower if these conditions are not available. It's score ranges from 0 at the least level of function to 100 at the highest.
3 years
Modified Rankin Scale
Time Frame: 3 years

This is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. It has become the most widely used clinical outcome measure for stroke clinical trials.The scale runs from 0-6, running from perfect health without symptoms to death.

0 - No symptoms.

  1. - No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms.
  2. - Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities.
  3. - Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted.
  4. - Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted.
  5. - Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent.
  6. - Dead.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dar Dowlatshahi, MD PhD, Scientific Investigator, OHRI

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 13, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 11, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 11, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke Sequelae

Clinical Trials on Speech therapy apps

3
Subscribe