Non-invasive Ventilation Versus High Flow Oxygen (HFO)

April 13, 2026 updated by: Niguarda Hospital

Non-invasive Ventilation Versus High Flow Oxygen Through Nasal Cannula in Pneumonia Associated Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of alternating Non Invasive Ventilation NIV and High Flow Oxygen HFO compared to High Flow Oxygen HFO alone on gas exchanges and prognosis in pneumonia-associated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Both Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) and High Flow Oxygen through nasal cannula (HFO) are widely used in the setting of hypoxemic respiratory failure of heterogeneous etiology, with no definitive evidence for the superiority of one technique on the other. The purpose of this study is to determine whether alternating NIV and HFO brings any advantage on gas exchanges and prognosis compared to the use of HFO alone in the homogeneous setting of pneumonia-associated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

128

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of pneumonia based on at least two clinical/laboratory criteria and 1 radiologic criterion among the following:

    • Clinical criteria: fever, cough, purulent sputum, pulmonary examination positive for signs consistent with pneumonia
    • Laboratory criteria: leukocytosis (White blood cells >10000/mcL) or leukopenia (White blood cells < 4000/mcL), rise of the inflammatory markers
    • Radiologic criteria: consolidations at Chest X-ray or CT scan
  • Hypoxemic respiratory failure, based on all the following criteria

    • PaO2/FiO2 < 300 after at least 15 minutes conventional oxygen therapy with a FiO2 ≥ 50%
    • Respiratory Rate (RR) ≥ 25/min or need for use of accessory muscles
  • Informed consent to study participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years
  • Hypercapnic respiratory failure (pCO2 > 60 mmHg at presentation) such as in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • Presence of another cause of hypoxemic respiratory failure - e.g. pulmonary embolism, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pulmonary oedema
  • Hemodynamic instability with necessity for use of inotropes and/or vasopressors
  • Indication for endotracheal intubation (ETI): Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <8, agitation, device intolerance, respiratory arrest
  • Immunosuppression (chronic immunosuppressive therapy, clinical history positive for any immunodeficiency - congenital or acquired)
  • Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) and Do Not Intubate (DNI) indication
  • Tracheostomy
  • Nocturnal CPAP ventilation therapy
  • Any other condition which the clinician would considered an adjunctive risk for taking part in the study or that would not permit the participant to complete it

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: HFO
Continuous high flow oxygen through nasal cannula for 45 hours; longer if the clinical need persists
High Flow Oxygen nasal cannula
Active Comparator: NIV/HFO
Alternating noninvasive ventilation (3 hours) and high flow oxygen through nasal cannula (3 hours) for 45 hours; longer if the clinical need persists
High Flow Oxygen nasal cannula
In this arm, participants receive noninvasive ventilation through an interface (such as full face mask or oro-nasal mask) alternated with continuous high flow oxygen though humidified nasal cannula

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PaO2/FiO2 improvement
Time Frame: at baseline and at 21 hours
Efficacy of alternating NIV and HFO compared to HFO alone in the determination of an improvement of PaO2/FiO2 at 21 hours compared to baseline PaO2/FiO2
at baseline and at 21 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intensive Care admission
Time Frame: 30 days
Rate of admission to Intensive Care Unit in the two arms
30 days
Sensation of device comfort and dyspnoea
Time Frame: Baseline, at 21 hours, 45 hours and 30 days after beginning treatment. Optional measures can be taken at 1, 3 and 9 hours
Evaluation of subjective sensation of device comfort and dyspnoea in the two arms
Baseline, at 21 hours, 45 hours and 30 days after beginning treatment. Optional measures can be taken at 1, 3 and 9 hours
Time to downgrade to conventional oxygen therapy
Time Frame: 30 days
Total amount of hours in which the patient needs to be treated with noninvasive ventilation alternate to versus high flow oxygen through nasal cannula
30 days
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
Mortality rate in the 2 arms
30 days
New hospital admission
Time Frame: 30 days
Rate of a new hospital admission within 30 days
30 days
PaO2/FiO2 improvement
Time Frame: at baseline and at 45 hours
Efficacy of alternating NIV and HFO compared to HFO alone in the determination of a change in PaO2/FiO2 at 45 hours compared to baseline PaO2/FiO2
at baseline and at 45 hours
PaO2/FiO2 improvement
Time Frame: at baseline and at 30 days
Efficacy of alternating NIV and HFO compared to HFO alone in the determination of a change in PaO2/FiO2 at 30 hours compared to baseline PaO2/FiO2
at baseline and at 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pneumonia-associated Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on High Flow Oxygen nasal cannula

Subscribe