- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03760016
Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke
March 24, 2025 updated by: Pierce Boyne, University of Cincinnati
The objective of this study is to determine the optimal training intensity and the minimum training duration needed to maximize immediate improvements in walking capacity in chronic stroke.
A single-blind, phase II, 3-site randomized controlled trial has been planned.
Fifty persons >6 months post stroke will randomize to either moderate-intensity aerobic locomotor training or high-intensity interval locomotor training; each for 45 minutes, 3x/week for up to 36 total sessions over approximately 12 weeks.
Clinical measures of walking function, aerobic fitness, daily walking activity and quality of life will be assessed at baseline (PRE) and after 4, 8 and 12 weeks of training (POST-4WK, POST-8WK, POST-12WK).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
55
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Delaware
-
Newark, Delaware, United States, 19713
- University of Delaware
-
-
Kansas
-
Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
- University of Kansas Medical Center
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
- University of Cincinnati
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
36 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 40-80 years at time of consenting
- Single stroke for which participant sought treatment, 6 months to 5 years prior to consent date
- Walking speed <1.0 m/s on the 10-meter walk test
- Able to walk 10m over ground with assistive devices as needed and no continuous physical assistance from another person (guarding and intermittent assistance for loss of balance allowed)
- Able to walk at least 3 minutes on the treadmill at ≥0.13m/s (0.3 mph)
- Stable cardiovascular condition (AHA class B, allowing for aerobic capacity <6 metabolic equivalents)
- Able to communicate with investigators, follow a 2-step command and correctly answer consent comprehension questions
Exclusion Criteria:
- Exercise testing uninterpretable for ischemia or arrhythmia (e.g. resting ECG abnormality that makes exercise ECG uninterpretable for ischemia and no other clinical testing from the past year available to rule out)
- Evidence of significant arrhythmia or myocardial ischemia on treadmill ECG graded exercise test in the absence of recent (past year) more definitive clinical testing (e.g. stress nuclear imaging) with negative result
- Hospitalization for cardiac or pulmonary disease within past 3 months
- Implanted pacemaker or defibrillator
- Significant ataxia or neglect (score of 2 on NIH stroke scale item 7 or 11)
- Severe lower limb spasticity (Ashworth >2)
- Recent history (<3 months) of illicit drug or alcohol abuse or significant mental illness
- Major post-stroke depression (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9] ≥ 10) in the absence of depression management by a health care provider
- Currently participating in physical therapy or another interventional study
- Recent botulinum toxin injection to the paretic lower limb (<3 months) or planning to have lower limb botulinum toxin injection in the next 4 months
- Foot drop or lower limb joint instability without adequate stabilizing device, as assessed by a physical therapist
- Clinically significant neurologic disorder other than stroke or unable to walk outside the home prior to stroke
- Other significant medical condition likely to limit improvement or jeopardize safety as assessed by a physical therapist (e.g. joint contracture, gait limited by pain)
- Pregnancy
- Previous exposure to fast treadmill walking (>3 cumulative hours) during clinical or research therapy in the past year
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Moderate-Intensity Aerobic Training
|
Overground and treadmill walking with speed continuously adjusted to maintain a target heart rate of 40 +/- 5% heart rate reserve, progressing up to 55 +/- 5% heart rate reserve.
|
|
Experimental: High-Intensity Interval Training
|
Overground and treadmill walking with 30 second bursts at maximum speed alternated with 30-60 second passive recovery periods.
Intended to achieve a target average heart rate above 60% heart rate reserve.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Six-Minute Walk Test Distance
Time Frame: Change Six-Minute Walk Test Distance from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
Total distance walked in 6 minutes in meters
|
Change Six-Minute Walk Test Distance from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
|
Six-Minute Walk Test Distance
Time Frame: Change Six-Minute Walk Test Distance from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
Total distance walked in 6 minutes in meters
|
Change Six-Minute Walk Test Distance from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
|
Six-Minute Walk Test Distance
Time Frame: Change Six-Minute Walk Test Distance from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
Total distance walked in 6 minutes in meters
|
Change Six-Minute Walk Test Distance from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comfortable Gait Speed
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
From 10-meter walk test, in meters per second
|
Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
|
Comfortable Gait Speed
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
From 10-meter walk test, in meters per second
|
Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
|
Comfortable Gait Speed
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
From 10-meter walk test, in meters per second
|
Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
|
Fast Gait Speed
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
From 10-meter walk test, in meters per second
|
Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
|
Fast Gait Speed
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
From 10-meter walk test, in meters per second
|
Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
|
Fast Gait Speed
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
From 10-meter walk test, in meters per second
|
Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
|
Aerobic Fitness
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
Oxygen consumption rate at ventilatory threshold during treadmill graded exercise test, in milliliters per kilogram body mass per minute
|
Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
|
Aerobic Fitness
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
Oxygen consumption rate at ventilatory threshold during treadmill graded exercise test, in milliliters per kilogram body mass per minute
|
Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
|
Aerobic Fitness
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
Oxygen consumption rate at ventilatory threshold during treadmill graded exercise test, in milliliters per kilogram body mass per minute
|
Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
|
PROMIS-Fatigue Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Scale is an 8-item self-report questionnaire about symptoms of fatigue.
Each item is rated from 1-5, where higher scores indicate greater fatigue.
A total raw score is calculated by summing the scores for each item.
The raw score is then translated into a T-score based on normative data.
The T-score is a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 for the U.S. general population, so a T-score of 60 (for example) would represent one SD higher (worse) fatigue than the average American.
|
Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
|
PROMIS-Fatigue Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Scale is an 8-item self-report questionnaire about symptoms of fatigue.
Each item is rated from 1-5, where higher scores indicate greater fatigue.
A total raw score is calculated by summing the scores for each item.
The raw score is then translated into a T-score based on normative data.
The T-score is a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 for the U.S. general population, so a T-score of 60 (for example) would represent one SD higher (worse) fatigue than the average American.
|
Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
|
PROMIS-Fatigue Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Scale is an 8-item self-report questionnaire about symptoms of fatigue.
Each item is rated from 1-5, where higher scores indicate greater fatigue.
A total raw score is calculated by summing the scores for each item.
The raw score is then translated into a T-score based on normative data.
The T-score is a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 for the U.S. general population, so a T-score of 60 (for example) would represent one SD higher (worse) fatigue than the average American.
|
Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Exercise Capacity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
Time to exhaustion during treadmill graded exercise test, recorded in minutes
|
Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
|
Exercise Capacity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
Time to exhaustion during treadmill graded exercise test, recorded in minutes
|
Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
|
Exercise Capacity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
Time to exhaustion during treadmill graded exercise test, recorded in minutes
|
Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
|
Peak Oxygen Consumption Rate
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
Peak oxygen consumption rate during treadmill graded exercise test, in milliliters per kilogram body mass per minute
|
Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
|
Peak Oxygen Consumption Rate
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
Peak oxygen consumption rate during treadmill graded exercise test, in milliliters per kilogram body mass per minute
|
Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
|
Peak Oxygen Consumption Rate
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
Peak oxygen consumption rate during treadmill graded exercise test, in milliliters per kilogram body mass per minute
|
Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
|
Metabolic Cost of Gait
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
Oxygen consumption rate relative to speed during treadmill graded exercise test, in milliliters per kilogram body mass per meter
|
Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
|
Metabolic Cost of Gait
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
Oxygen consumption rate relative to speed during treadmill graded exercise test, in milliliters per kilogram body mass per meter
|
Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
|
Metabolic Cost of Gait
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
Oxygen consumption rate relative to speed during treadmill graded exercise test, in milliliters per kilogram body mass per meter
|
Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
|
EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
A 5-item questionnaire about quality of life, including: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each item is scored from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate greater quality of life.
A total misery score was calculated by summing the scores for each item (min 5, max 25).
|
Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
|
EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
A 5-item questionnaire about quality of life, including: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each item is scored from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate greater quality of life.
A total misery score was calculated by summing the scores for each item (min 5, max 25).
|
Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
|
EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
A 5-item questionnaire about quality of life, including: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each item is scored from 1 to 5, where lower scores indicate greater quality of life.
A total misery score was calculated by summing the scores for each item (min 5, max 25).
|
Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
|
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
A 16-item questionnaire that asks participants to rate their balance confidence during everyday tasks, as a percentage from 0-100%, where higher scores indicate greater balance self-efficacy.
A total score from 0-100 is calculated by averaging the scores for each item.
|
Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
|
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
A 16-item questionnaire that asks participants to rate their balance confidence during everyday tasks, as a percentage from 0-100%, where higher scores indicate greater balance self-efficacy.
A total score from 0-100 is calculated by averaging the scores for each item.
|
Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
|
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
A 16-item questionnaire that asks participants to rate their balance confidence during everyday tasks, as a percentage from 0-100%, where higher scores indicate greater balance self-efficacy.
A total score from 0-100 is calculated by averaging the scores for each item.
|
Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
|
Daily Walking Activity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
Mean daily step count recorded with activity monitor, recorded as steps per day
|
Change from Baseline to 4 Weeks
|
|
Daily Walking Activity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
Mean daily step count recorded with activity monitor, recorded as steps per day
|
Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks
|
|
Daily Walking Activity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
Mean daily step count recorded with activity monitor, recorded as steps per day
|
Change from Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Pierce Boyne, DPT, PhD, University of Cincinnati
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Miller A, Reisman DS, Billinger SA, Dunning K, Doren S, Ward J, Wright H, Wagner E, Carl D, Gerson M, Awosika O, Khoury J, Kissela B, Boyne P. Moderate-intensity exercise versus high-intensity interval training to recover walking post-stroke: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Jul 16;22(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05419-x.
- Boyne P, Billinger SA, Reisman DS, Awosika OO, Buckley S, Burson J, Carl D, DeLange M, Doren S, Earnest M, Gerson M, Henry M, Horning A, Khoury JC, Kissela BM, Laughlin A, McCartney K, McQuaid T, Miller A, Moores A, Palmer JA, Sucharew H, Thompson ED, Wagner E, Ward J, Wasik EP, Whitaker AA, Wright H, Dunning K. Optimal Intensity and Duration of Walking Rehabilitation in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2023 Apr 1;80(4):342-351. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.0033.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 4, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 25, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
April 25, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 26, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 29, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
November 30, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
March 26, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 24, 2025
Last Verified
March 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2017-5325
- R01HD093694 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
We deposited the final, de-identified dataset and data documentation into the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Data and Specimen Hub (DASH) archive (URL below)
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data are available now and should remain available indefinitely.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Established by the repository
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Study Data/Documents
-
Individual Participant Data Set
Information identifier: 424597
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, EmbolicUnited States
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaRecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke PatientThailand
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | ExoskeletonSouth Korea
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusScuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus...Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke IschemicItaly
Clinical Trials on Moderate-Intensity Aerobic Training
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingPsychological Well-BeingPakistan
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedPulmonary Artery HypertensionEgypt
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyCompleted
-
Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico...CompletedHeart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Chronotropic IncompetenceSpain
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
National Taiwan University HospitalUnknownPhysical Activity | Exercise | Metabolic Syndrome XTaiwan
-
Federal University of UberlandiaTerminatedHypertension | MenopauseBrazil
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Pakistan
-
University of South CarolinaCompletedObstructive Sleep ApneaUnited States
-
Federal University of ParaíbaCompletedChronic Disease | Overweight and Obesity