Laryngeal Mask Supreme and I-Gel in Edentulate Geriatric Patients

March 25, 2022 updated by: Sule Ozbilgin, Dokuz Eylul University

Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Supreme and I-Gel in Edentulate Geriatric Patients

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate ease and duration of placing Laryngeal Mask Supreme (LM) and applying I-gel in geriatric patients without teeth. The secondary aim is to compare their effects on ventilation parameters.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prospective, randomized and double-blind study, aged from 18 to 65 years undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

The patients are randomly assigned to 2 groups:

  • Group 1: i-gel
  • Group 2: laryngeal mask airway - Supreme

Procedure:

The investigation protocol contains the following sections:

  1. Induction of anaesthesia: Preoxygenation will be provided at 6 Liter/min oxygen for three minutes by using a facial mask. After anesthesia induction with fentanyl 1-2 μg/kg and propofol 1-2 mg/kg (12), mask ventilation will be applied with 100% oxygen.
  2. Bispectral index values will be held between 40-60.Bispectral index values will be within this interval by increasing or decreasing propofol infusion by 1 mg/kg after additional bolus dose of propofol (1 mg/kg).
  3. Insertion of the airway device. The size of the airway device used is based on the manufacturers' recommendations. All devices are deflated a lubricated prior to use. Once inserted, the cuff is be inflated with a manometer up to 60 cm H20 Data recorded: size of airway device, time an number of attempts.
  4. Maintenance of anesthesia will be achieved with sevoflurane 1,5-2,5% in a mixture of 50% O2/ 50% nitrogen protoxide. Sevoflurane concentrations will be adjusted to keep bispectral index values at 40-60.
  5. Measurement of airway seal pressure (oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP): at baseline, and two minutes after the airway tool is placed, every 15 minutes until the operation ends and before the airway tool is removed.
  6. Ventilatory mechanics and parameters and hemodynamic parameters are measured at baseline, and two minutes after the airway tool is placed, every 15 minutes until the operation ends and before the airway tool is removed.
  7. Perioperative complications: Cough, vomiting, laryngeal spasm, laryngeal Stridor
  8. Removal of the airway device: Presence of blood - 3 level grading (1:no blood; 2: trace amounts of blood; 3: clear amounts of blood). Complications: sore throat (visual analogue scale :10-point scale), dysphonia (yes/no), dysphagia (yes/no).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

124

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • İzmir, Turkey, 35340
        • Recruiting
        • Sule Ozbilgin
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sibel Büyükçoban, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification I-III patients
  • patients aged 65 years and older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having teeth or fixed prosthesis
  • having a pathology of the neck or the upper respiratory tract
  • having a risk of regurgitation of gastric content/ aspiration (prior upper gastrointestinal system surgery, hiatus hernia, gastrointestinal reflux, history of peptic ulcer and full stomach)
  • history or possibility of difficult airway (history of impossible intubation, mallampati score of 3-4, sternomental distance of shorter than 12 cm, thyromental distance of shorter than 6cm, head extension of lower than 90 degrees and mouth opening of lower than 1.5 cm)
  • lower pulmonary compliance or higher airway resistance (morbid obesity -BMI>35kg/m2- and pulmonary disease) Each patient will be examined preoperatively and American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification scores and mallampati scores will be recorded. Standard monitoring (ECG, pulse oximetry and noninvasive blood pressure measurement) and bispectral index monitoring will be performed in each patient before induction of anesthesia in the surgical room.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Laryngeal mask Supreme
Device: Laryngeal mask Supreme
Device: Laryngeal mask Supreme evaluation
Other Names:
  • Device: Laryngeal mask Supreme evaluation
Experimental: i-gel
Device: i-gel
Device: i-gel evaluation
Other Names:
  • Device: i-gel evaluation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Airway Seal Pressure Values
Time Frame: intraoperative
intraoperative
insertion time
Time Frame: intraoperative
placement of airway device (second)
intraoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
sore throat
Time Frame: postoperative 1th hour and 24th hour
postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity- (Visual Analog Pain Scale is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity ), ("no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 [100-mm scale])
postoperative 1th hour and 24th hour
dysphagia
Time Frame: postoperative 1th hour and 24th hour
postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity- dysphagia (yes/no)
postoperative 1th hour and 24th hour
dysphonia
Time Frame: postoperative 1th hour and 24th hour
postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity- dysphonia (yes/no)
postoperative 1th hour and 24th hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sibel Büyükçoban, Dokuz Eylül University, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 341-SBKAEK

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Airway Morbidity

Clinical Trials on Laryngeal mask Supreme evaluation

Subscribe