I-gel vs Ambu AuraGain in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery

March 25, 2022 updated by: Sule Ozbilgin, Dokuz Eylul University

Comparison of I-gel and Ambu AuraGain Without Neuromuscular Blocker in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery

To compare the effects of i-gel and Ambu AuraGain on ventilation parameters and surgical view during Trendelenburg position laparoscopic gynecological surgery in cases administered positive pressure ventilation without the use of neuromuscular agents.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Detailed Description

Prospective, multicenter, randomized and double-blind study, aged from 18 to 65 years undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

The patients are randomly assigned to 2 groups:

Group i-gel Group Ambu AuraGain

Procedure:

The investigation protocol contains the following sections:

  1. Induction of anaesthesia. For preoperative sedation 0.02 mg/kg midazolam IV will be administered. 2 minutes of 0.2 µ/kg/min remifentanil and 6 mg kg st-1 propofol infusion, IV 1-2 mg kg-1 propofol . No muscle relaxant will be used for insertion of the airway device.
  2. Bispectral index values will be held between 40-60.Bispectral index values will be within this interval by increasing or decreasing propofol infusion by 1 mg/kg after additional bolus dose of propofol (1 mg/kg).
  3. Insertion of the airway device. The size of the airway device used is based on the manufacturers' recommendations.
  4. Anesthesia maintenance will be ensured by 50% O2/air with 0.1-0.4 µ kg/min-1 remifentanil and 4-10 mg/kg/hr propofol IV infusion
  5. Functionality of the gastric drainage channel of the airway device
  6. Measurement of airway seal pressure (oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP): at baseline, and at 2 minutes after airway device insertion (T1), 10 minutes after insufflation (T2), before desufflation (T3), before removal of airway device (T4). The maximum pressure allowed is 40 cm H2O.
  7. Ventilatory mechanics and parameters and hemodynamic parameters are measured at baseline, and at T1, T2, T3 and T4.
  8. Perioperative complications: Cough, vomiting, laryngeal spasm, laryngeal Stridor, airway intervention requirements, hypoxia (SpO2 < 92%)
  9. Removal of the airway device: Presence of blood - 3 level grading (1:no blood; 2: trace amounts of blood; 3: clear amounts of blood). Complications: sore throat ( VAS:10-point scale), dysphonia (yes/no), dysphagia (yes/no).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain
        • Sureste University Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care
      • Izmir, Turkey
        • Dokuz Eylül University, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA classification I-II
  • Between 18-65 years
  • Undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Those with any neck or upper respiratory tract pathology
  2. Those at risk of gastric content regurgitation/aspiration (previous upper GIS surgery, known hiatus hernia, gastroesophageal reflux, history of peptic ulcers, full stomach, pregnancy)
  3. Those with low pulmonary compliance or high airway resistance (chronic pulmonary diseases)
  4. Obese patients (BMI >35)
  5. Those with throat pain, dysphagia and dysphonia
  6. Those with possible or previous difficult airway
  7. Those with operations planned for longer than 4 hours
  8. Conversion to laparotomy
  9. Neuromuscular blocking agent used

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group i-gel
Insertion of the airway device. The size of the airway device used is based on the manufacturers' recommendations and evaluation of its clinical performance
Evaluation of clinical performance in terms of insertion, ventilation and complications
Other Names:
  • Group i-gel
Experimental: Group Ambu Auragain
Insertion of the airway device. The size of the airway device used is based on the manufacturers' recommendations and evaluation of its clinical performance
Evaluation of clinical performance in terms of insertion, ventilation and complications
Other Names:
  • Group Ambu AuroGain

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Insertion time
Time Frame: intraoperative
The time taken to successfully place the device in seconds
intraoperative
Change in airway seal pressure
Time Frame: intraoperative
The maximum oropharyngeal leak pressure attained for each device.
intraoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of attempts at insertion
Time Frame: intraoperative
The number of repeated attempts required for successfully placing the device. Each device was given a chance of 3 attempts if still unsuccessful after 3 attempts another device was placed.
intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sule Ozbilgin, MD, Dokuz Eylül University, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 351-SBKAEK
  • HUSE 012-ANR-2017 (Other Identifier: Hospital Universitario del Sureste)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on i-gel

Subscribe