Muscle Wasting in the Critically Ill

November 3, 2020 updated by: Ingeborg Welters, University of Liverpool

Effect of Early Rehabilitation Using an Active/Passive Cycling Device on Muscle Wasting in the Critically Ill: A Randomised Controlled Study

Muscle wasting is a common consequence of critical illness, and has a profound impact upon the rehabilitation of those who survive admission to critical to care. The investigators intend to assess if the application of 10 sessions over two weeks of passive cycling with electrical stimulation to the lower limbs and abdomen can prevent muscle loss, or at least cause less muscle loss, compared to patients who receive standard daily sessions of physiotherapy. This will be done by comparing the changes in muscle size on ultrasound between the two groups, comparing functional measures at a 3 month follow up, and by performing translational research using tissue samples taken during the study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Patients are mechanically ventilated and sedated with a diagnosis of sepsis (from any source) will be eligible for this study. Provided they meet the inclusion criteria, they will be randomised within 48 hours of admission, to either ten 30 minute sessions of passive cycling with functional electrical stimulation (FES) to the thighs, hamstrings, calves and abdomen over a 14 day period, or to a control group of routine physiotherapy. The trial group will also receive this physiotherapy.

On admission to the study, all patients will receive on day 1:

Ultrasound measurements of:

Rectus femoris cross-sectional area Thickness of rectus femoris and vastus intermedius Thickness, pennation angle and derived fascicle length of vastus lateralis and medial head of gastrocnemius Thickness of rectus abdominis. Thickness of diaphragm

A blood sample taken from an arterial line A urine sample taken from a urinary catheter A muscle biopsy taken from the right vastus lateralis

They will then receive ten 30 minute sessions of passive cycling with functional electrical stimulation over 14 days, or a control group will receive routine physiotherapy during this period.

Repeat ultrasounds will be taken at days 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14. Repeat blood and urine sampling at days 5, 10 and 14. Repeat muscle biopsy at day 14.

All cycling, ultrasounds and tissue sampling will end on day 14 regardless of the ventilator status of the patient.

In patients who survive to be discharged from critical care, they will be followed up at 3 months for:

Repeat ultrasound scan of all muscles listed Six minute walk test Hand grip and lower limb dynamometry, Balance testing (by standing upright on a pressure plate for 20 seconds) Psychological assessment using the 36 item Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire

Tissue sampling will be stored in the University of Liverpool for analysis of biomarkers of muscle damage and loss between the two groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Liverpool, United Kingdom, L7 8XP
        • Intensive Care Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be recruited in the Intensive Care Unit of the Royal Liverpool University Hospital. All patients will be over 18, and have a critical illness that requires mechanical ventilation with an initial period of sedation. This study will focus on patients with a definite or suspected case of sepsis from any source.

Sepsis has been recently redefined as: "Life threatening organ-dysfunction caused by dysregulated host response to infection" whilst septic shock has become a subset of sepsis, defined as: "circulatory and cellular/metabolic dysfunction associated with a higher risk of mortality(44).

For the purposes of this study, a patient will be regarded as septic if they have evidence of infection-related organ failure (e.g. sepsis-associated coagulopathy, altered mental state, cardiovascular dysfunction, acute kidney injury, and altered liver function) and require invasive mechanical ventilation with either definite or suspected evidence of infection. This is to allow prompt treatment with FES rather than waiting for a positive microbiological result to be obtained.

Within the definition of sepsis "from any source" a list of following is illustrative but not exhaustive:

  • Urogenital sepsis (including urosepsis, pyelonephritis, endometritis and chorioamnionitis)
  • Pneumonia (including community acquired, hospital acquired, and aspiration pneumonia. Ventilator associated pneumonia would be excluded.)
  • Neurological infections such as encephalitis and meningitis.
  • Cellulitis, osteomyelitis and infections of soft tissue NOT affecting the lower limb.
  • Surgical infections, including post-operative laparotomy with evidence of peritoneal soiling, and evidence of infection prior to the operation, in patients who require 2 or more organ system support after the operation.
  • Intra-abdominal sepsis, including biliary sepsis, hepatitis, and acute pancreatitis. In the case of acute pancreatitis, evidence of infection is required to fulfil the criteria. Acute pancreatitis with sterile tissue/fluid samples would not be suitable.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18
  • Patients who decline consent
  • Pregnancy
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Rhabdomyolysis
  • Lower limb trauma
  • Patients unlikely to survive to 96 hours post admission
  • Consent unobtainable within 48 hours of admission
  • Morbid obesity (BMI>40).
  • Presence of a pacemaker or Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD).
  • Unlikely to be mechanically ventilated for more than 48 hours.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cycling with FES

Ten sessions of 14 days in patients consented within 48 hours of arriving in critical care who are sedated and mechanically ventilated with a diagnosis of sepsis from any source.

Sessions last a maximum of 30 minutes (with an ideal minimum of 20 minutes), using the Restorative Therapies (RT) 300 Supine with the Sage 12-channel stimulator. Stimulation will provided to the quadriceps, hamstrings, calves and abdomen. Both legs and both sides of the abdomen will be stimulated. Stimulation current settings are individualised for each patient and each muscle group.

These patients will also receive their routine physiotherapy that they would have received if they were in the control group (or not in the trial at all).

As described already
Other Names:
  • RT-300 Supine
  • Restorative Therapies
Active Comparator: Control - routine physiotherapy
Usual daily physiotherapy, consisting of limb care and mobilisation, and respiratory care and exercises as appropriate.
As described already

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ultrasound assessment of rectus femoris - Change in cross sectional area (cm2)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Measurement of cross-sectional area of rectus femoris (cm2)
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Ultrasound assessment of rectus femoris - Change in muscle layer thickness (cm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Measurement on muscle layer thickness of rectus femoris (cm)
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Ultrasound assessment of anterior thigh musculature - Change in muscle layer thickness (cm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Measurement of combined muscle layer thickness of rectus femoris and vastus intermedius (cm)
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Ultrasound assessment of vastus lateralis - change in muscle layer thickness (cm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Measurement of the thickness of the vastus lateralis between the superficial and deep aponeuroses (cm)
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Ultrasound assessment of vastus lateralis - change in fascicle pennation angle (degrees)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Measurement of the pennation angle of the muscle fascicles as they insert into the deep aponeuroses of the vastus lateralis muscle (degrees)
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Ultrasound assessment of vastus lateralis - change in fascicle length (cm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
This is a single measure, derived by trigonometry (the Sine of the pennation angle multiplied by the muscle thickness).
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Ultrasound assessment of the medial head of gastrocnemius - change in muscle thickness (cm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Measurement of the thickness of the medial head of the gastrocnemius between the superficial and deep aponeuroses (cm)
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Ultrasound assessment of the medial head of gastrocnemius - change in fascicle pennation angle (degrees)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Measurement of the pennation angle of the muscle fascicles as they insert into the deep aponeuroses of the medial head of gastrocnemius (angles)
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Ultrasound assessment of the medial head of gastrocnemius - change in fascicle length (cm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
This is single measure which is mathematically derived by trigonometry using the known pennation angle (degrees) and thickness (cm): the Sine of the pennation angle multiplied by the muscle thickness.
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Ultrasound assessment of the rectus abdominis muscle - change in muscle layer thickness (cm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Measurement of rectus abdominis muscle layer thickness - (cm)
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Diaphragm thickness assessment by ultrasound - change in end expiratory thickness (mm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Assessment of thickness at end expiration (mm)
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Diaphragm thickness assessment by ultrasound - change in end inspiratory thickness (mm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Assessment of thickness at end inspiration (mm)
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Diaphragm thickness assessment by ultrasound - change in thickening fraction (%)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Assessment of thickening fraction, derived mathematically from thicknesses at inspiration and expiration (%)
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Ultrasound assessment of change in diaphragmatic excursion (cm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
Assessment of maximal excursion of diaphragm, measured with M-mode ultrasonography (mm)
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of change in blood biomarkers (microRNA analysis for markers of muscle loss, expressed as a percentage fold increase/decrease compared to baseline).
Time Frame: Samples taken on days 1, 5, 10 and 14
Blood samples taken during the study period and analysed for markers of muscle loss/degradation
Samples taken on days 1, 5, 10 and 14
Measurement of change in urinary biomarkers (microRNA analysis for markers of muscle loss, expressed as a percentage-fold increase/decrease compared to baseline).
Time Frame: Samples taken on days 1, 5, 10 and 14
Blood and urine samples taken during the study period and analysed for markers of muscle loss/degradation
Samples taken on days 1, 5, 10 and 14
Measurement of the number of biomarkers expressed from muscle biopsies (microRNA analysis for markers of muscle loss, expressed as the number and type of micro-RNAs expressed within the samples).
Time Frame: Samples taken on day 1 and 14
Muscle biopsy samples taken during the study period and analysed for markers of muscle loss/degradation. Number and type of micro-RNAs to be noted).
Samples taken on day 1 and 14
Measurement of muscle fibre cross sectional area from muscle biopsies (mm2)
Time Frame: Samples taken on day 1 and 14
Histological staining and analysis of muscle fibre composition, expressed in square millimetres and as a percentage-fold increase/decrease compared to baseline).
Samples taken on day 1 and 14
Follow up testing - Distance achieved in a 6 minute walk test, metres)
Time Frame: At 3 month follow up
Distance achieved during a 6 minute shuttle walk of 20 metres length
At 3 month follow up
Follow up testing - Hand grip dynamometry (hand grip strength, Newtons)
Time Frame: At 3 month follow up
Strength of hand grip in both hands
At 3 month follow up
Follow up - Lower limb strength assessment - Force generated at maximal contraction for knee extension (Newtons)
Time Frame: At 3 month follow up
Strength of extension at the knee in both legs using a hand held dynamometry device (microFET 2 wireless device). Measured in Newtons.
At 3 month follow up
Follow up testing - Balance assessment - Comparison of changes in center of pressure on a pressure plate.
Time Frame: At 3 month follow up
Comparison of changes in centre of pressure on a pressure plate. The centre of pressure is measured over 20 seconds with the participant standing still. Maximal variation in lateral and anterior-posterior sway is recorded by the pressure plate.
At 3 month follow up
Follow up testing - Psychological assessment - Comparison of total scores obtained from the SF-36 questionnaire (maximum score 100, minimum score zero).
Time Frame: At 3 month follow up
Comparison of scores obtained from the SF-36 questionnaire between the two groups. A lower score indicates greater disability.
At 3 month follow up
Follow Up - Maximal Inspiratory Pressure monitoring in kilopascals (kPa)
Time Frame: At 3 month follow up
Using the Power Breathe K2 device
At 3 month follow up
Incidence of delirium during the trial period - using the CAM-ICU tool.
Time Frame: Days 1-14
Assessed by twice daily Cambridge Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) assessments
Days 1-14
Incidence of renal replacement therapy during the trial period
Time Frame: Days 1-14
Daily monitoring to see if patient has required renal replacement therapy (defined as either haemofiltration or haemodialysis).
Days 1-14
Total dose of noradrenaline given per day
Time Frame: Day 1-14
Daily monitoring of doses of inotropic and vasopressor drugs
Day 1-14
Overall fluid balance (in mls) at the end of each study day
Time Frame: Day 1-14
Daily noting of 24 hour fluid balance
Day 1-14
Total Insulin doses (in international units) required per day
Time Frame: Day 1-14
Daily monitoring of exogenous insulin requirements
Day 1-14
Blood glucose concentration (mmol/L)
Time Frame: Day 1-14
Daily monitoring of glucose levels
Day 1-14
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions)
Measured via a wireless skin patch
Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions)
Safety - number of times an endotracheal/tracheostomy tube is dislodged during the cycling sessions
Time Frame: Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions)
Expressed as a simple count of how many times an airway device dislodges
Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions)
Safety - number of times an nasogastric tube is dislodged during the cycling sessions
Time Frame: Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions).
Expressed as a simple count of how many times a nasogastric feed tube dislodges.
Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions).
Safety - number of times an a central or arterial line device is dislodged during the cycling sessions
Time Frame: Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions).
Expressed as a simple count of how many times a central or arterial line dislodges.
Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ingeborg D Welters, University of Liverpool

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 14, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Translational research will take place in the Institute of Aging and Chronic Disease. Only the participant number of the sample will be shared with any staff working with tissue samples.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Muscle Weakness

Clinical Trials on Cycling with FES

Subscribe