- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03770442
Muscle Wasting in the Critically Ill
Effect of Early Rehabilitation Using an Active/Passive Cycling Device on Muscle Wasting in the Critically Ill: A Randomised Controlled Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients are mechanically ventilated and sedated with a diagnosis of sepsis (from any source) will be eligible for this study. Provided they meet the inclusion criteria, they will be randomised within 48 hours of admission, to either ten 30 minute sessions of passive cycling with functional electrical stimulation (FES) to the thighs, hamstrings, calves and abdomen over a 14 day period, or to a control group of routine physiotherapy. The trial group will also receive this physiotherapy.
On admission to the study, all patients will receive on day 1:
Ultrasound measurements of:
Rectus femoris cross-sectional area Thickness of rectus femoris and vastus intermedius Thickness, pennation angle and derived fascicle length of vastus lateralis and medial head of gastrocnemius Thickness of rectus abdominis. Thickness of diaphragm
A blood sample taken from an arterial line A urine sample taken from a urinary catheter A muscle biopsy taken from the right vastus lateralis
They will then receive ten 30 minute sessions of passive cycling with functional electrical stimulation over 14 days, or a control group will receive routine physiotherapy during this period.
Repeat ultrasounds will be taken at days 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14. Repeat blood and urine sampling at days 5, 10 and 14. Repeat muscle biopsy at day 14.
All cycling, ultrasounds and tissue sampling will end on day 14 regardless of the ventilator status of the patient.
In patients who survive to be discharged from critical care, they will be followed up at 3 months for:
Repeat ultrasound scan of all muscles listed Six minute walk test Hand grip and lower limb dynamometry, Balance testing (by standing upright on a pressure plate for 20 seconds) Psychological assessment using the 36 item Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire
Tissue sampling will be stored in the University of Liverpool for analysis of biomarkers of muscle damage and loss between the two groups.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Liverpool, United Kingdom, L7 8XP
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients will be recruited in the Intensive Care Unit of the Royal Liverpool University Hospital. All patients will be over 18, and have a critical illness that requires mechanical ventilation with an initial period of sedation. This study will focus on patients with a definite or suspected case of sepsis from any source.
Sepsis has been recently redefined as: "Life threatening organ-dysfunction caused by dysregulated host response to infection" whilst septic shock has become a subset of sepsis, defined as: "circulatory and cellular/metabolic dysfunction associated with a higher risk of mortality(44).
For the purposes of this study, a patient will be regarded as septic if they have evidence of infection-related organ failure (e.g. sepsis-associated coagulopathy, altered mental state, cardiovascular dysfunction, acute kidney injury, and altered liver function) and require invasive mechanical ventilation with either definite or suspected evidence of infection. This is to allow prompt treatment with FES rather than waiting for a positive microbiological result to be obtained.
Within the definition of sepsis "from any source" a list of following is illustrative but not exhaustive:
- Urogenital sepsis (including urosepsis, pyelonephritis, endometritis and chorioamnionitis)
- Pneumonia (including community acquired, hospital acquired, and aspiration pneumonia. Ventilator associated pneumonia would be excluded.)
- Neurological infections such as encephalitis and meningitis.
- Cellulitis, osteomyelitis and infections of soft tissue NOT affecting the lower limb.
- Surgical infections, including post-operative laparotomy with evidence of peritoneal soiling, and evidence of infection prior to the operation, in patients who require 2 or more organ system support after the operation.
- Intra-abdominal sepsis, including biliary sepsis, hepatitis, and acute pancreatitis. In the case of acute pancreatitis, evidence of infection is required to fulfil the criteria. Acute pancreatitis with sterile tissue/fluid samples would not be suitable.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients under 18
- Patients who decline consent
- Pregnancy
- Neuromuscular disease
- Rhabdomyolysis
- Lower limb trauma
- Patients unlikely to survive to 96 hours post admission
- Consent unobtainable within 48 hours of admission
- Morbid obesity (BMI>40).
- Presence of a pacemaker or Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD).
- Unlikely to be mechanically ventilated for more than 48 hours.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cycling with FES
Ten sessions of 14 days in patients consented within 48 hours of arriving in critical care who are sedated and mechanically ventilated with a diagnosis of sepsis from any source. Sessions last a maximum of 30 minutes (with an ideal minimum of 20 minutes), using the Restorative Therapies (RT) 300 Supine with the Sage 12-channel stimulator. Stimulation will provided to the quadriceps, hamstrings, calves and abdomen. Both legs and both sides of the abdomen will be stimulated. Stimulation current settings are individualised for each patient and each muscle group. These patients will also receive their routine physiotherapy that they would have received if they were in the control group (or not in the trial at all). |
As described already
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Control - routine physiotherapy
Usual daily physiotherapy, consisting of limb care and mobilisation, and respiratory care and exercises as appropriate.
|
As described already
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ultrasound assessment of rectus femoris - Change in cross sectional area (cm2)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
Measurement of cross-sectional area of rectus femoris (cm2)
|
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
|
Ultrasound assessment of rectus femoris - Change in muscle layer thickness (cm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
Measurement on muscle layer thickness of rectus femoris (cm)
|
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
|
Ultrasound assessment of anterior thigh musculature - Change in muscle layer thickness (cm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
Measurement of combined muscle layer thickness of rectus femoris and vastus intermedius (cm)
|
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
|
Ultrasound assessment of vastus lateralis - change in muscle layer thickness (cm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
Measurement of the thickness of the vastus lateralis between the superficial and deep aponeuroses (cm)
|
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
|
Ultrasound assessment of vastus lateralis - change in fascicle pennation angle (degrees)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
Measurement of the pennation angle of the muscle fascicles as they insert into the deep aponeuroses of the vastus lateralis muscle (degrees)
|
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
|
Ultrasound assessment of vastus lateralis - change in fascicle length (cm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
This is a single measure, derived by trigonometry (the Sine of the pennation angle multiplied by the muscle thickness).
|
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
|
Ultrasound assessment of the medial head of gastrocnemius - change in muscle thickness (cm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
Measurement of the thickness of the medial head of the gastrocnemius between the superficial and deep aponeuroses (cm)
|
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
|
Ultrasound assessment of the medial head of gastrocnemius - change in fascicle pennation angle (degrees)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
Measurement of the pennation angle of the muscle fascicles as they insert into the deep aponeuroses of the medial head of gastrocnemius (angles)
|
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
|
Ultrasound assessment of the medial head of gastrocnemius - change in fascicle length (cm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
This is single measure which is mathematically derived by trigonometry using the known pennation angle (degrees) and thickness (cm): the Sine of the pennation angle multiplied by the muscle thickness.
|
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
|
Ultrasound assessment of the rectus abdominis muscle - change in muscle layer thickness (cm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
Measurement of rectus abdominis muscle layer thickness - (cm)
|
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
|
Diaphragm thickness assessment by ultrasound - change in end expiratory thickness (mm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
Assessment of thickness at end expiration (mm)
|
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
|
Diaphragm thickness assessment by ultrasound - change in end inspiratory thickness (mm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
Assessment of thickness at end inspiration (mm)
|
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
|
Diaphragm thickness assessment by ultrasound - change in thickening fraction (%)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
Assessment of thickening fraction, derived mathematically from thicknesses at inspiration and expiration (%)
|
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
|
Ultrasound assessment of change in diaphragmatic excursion (cm)
Time Frame: Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
Assessment of maximal excursion of diaphragm, measured with M-mode ultrasonography (mm)
|
Ultrasounds taken on day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14, and at 3 month follow up.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Measurement of change in blood biomarkers (microRNA analysis for markers of muscle loss, expressed as a percentage fold increase/decrease compared to baseline).
Time Frame: Samples taken on days 1, 5, 10 and 14
|
Blood samples taken during the study period and analysed for markers of muscle loss/degradation
|
Samples taken on days 1, 5, 10 and 14
|
|
Measurement of change in urinary biomarkers (microRNA analysis for markers of muscle loss, expressed as a percentage-fold increase/decrease compared to baseline).
Time Frame: Samples taken on days 1, 5, 10 and 14
|
Blood and urine samples taken during the study period and analysed for markers of muscle loss/degradation
|
Samples taken on days 1, 5, 10 and 14
|
|
Measurement of the number of biomarkers expressed from muscle biopsies (microRNA analysis for markers of muscle loss, expressed as the number and type of micro-RNAs expressed within the samples).
Time Frame: Samples taken on day 1 and 14
|
Muscle biopsy samples taken during the study period and analysed for markers of muscle loss/degradation.
Number and type of micro-RNAs to be noted).
|
Samples taken on day 1 and 14
|
|
Measurement of muscle fibre cross sectional area from muscle biopsies (mm2)
Time Frame: Samples taken on day 1 and 14
|
Histological staining and analysis of muscle fibre composition, expressed in square millimetres and as a percentage-fold increase/decrease compared to baseline).
|
Samples taken on day 1 and 14
|
|
Follow up testing - Distance achieved in a 6 minute walk test, metres)
Time Frame: At 3 month follow up
|
Distance achieved during a 6 minute shuttle walk of 20 metres length
|
At 3 month follow up
|
|
Follow up testing - Hand grip dynamometry (hand grip strength, Newtons)
Time Frame: At 3 month follow up
|
Strength of hand grip in both hands
|
At 3 month follow up
|
|
Follow up - Lower limb strength assessment - Force generated at maximal contraction for knee extension (Newtons)
Time Frame: At 3 month follow up
|
Strength of extension at the knee in both legs using a hand held dynamometry device (microFET 2 wireless device).
Measured in Newtons.
|
At 3 month follow up
|
|
Follow up testing - Balance assessment - Comparison of changes in center of pressure on a pressure plate.
Time Frame: At 3 month follow up
|
Comparison of changes in centre of pressure on a pressure plate.
The centre of pressure is measured over 20 seconds with the participant standing still.
Maximal variation in lateral and anterior-posterior sway is recorded by the pressure plate.
|
At 3 month follow up
|
|
Follow up testing - Psychological assessment - Comparison of total scores obtained from the SF-36 questionnaire (maximum score 100, minimum score zero).
Time Frame: At 3 month follow up
|
Comparison of scores obtained from the SF-36 questionnaire between the two groups.
A lower score indicates greater disability.
|
At 3 month follow up
|
|
Follow Up - Maximal Inspiratory Pressure monitoring in kilopascals (kPa)
Time Frame: At 3 month follow up
|
Using the Power Breathe K2 device
|
At 3 month follow up
|
|
Incidence of delirium during the trial period - using the CAM-ICU tool.
Time Frame: Days 1-14
|
Assessed by twice daily Cambridge Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) assessments
|
Days 1-14
|
|
Incidence of renal replacement therapy during the trial period
Time Frame: Days 1-14
|
Daily monitoring to see if patient has required renal replacement therapy (defined as either haemofiltration or haemodialysis).
|
Days 1-14
|
|
Total dose of noradrenaline given per day
Time Frame: Day 1-14
|
Daily monitoring of doses of inotropic and vasopressor drugs
|
Day 1-14
|
|
Overall fluid balance (in mls) at the end of each study day
Time Frame: Day 1-14
|
Daily noting of 24 hour fluid balance
|
Day 1-14
|
|
Total Insulin doses (in international units) required per day
Time Frame: Day 1-14
|
Daily monitoring of exogenous insulin requirements
|
Day 1-14
|
|
Blood glucose concentration (mmol/L)
Time Frame: Day 1-14
|
Daily monitoring of glucose levels
|
Day 1-14
|
|
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions)
|
Measured via a wireless skin patch
|
Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions)
|
|
Safety - number of times an endotracheal/tracheostomy tube is dislodged during the cycling sessions
Time Frame: Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions)
|
Expressed as a simple count of how many times an airway device dislodges
|
Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions)
|
|
Safety - number of times an nasogastric tube is dislodged during the cycling sessions
Time Frame: Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions).
|
Expressed as a simple count of how many times a nasogastric feed tube dislodges.
|
Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions).
|
|
Safety - number of times an a central or arterial line device is dislodged during the cycling sessions
Time Frame: Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions).
|
Expressed as a simple count of how many times a central or arterial line dislodges.
|
Days 1 - 14 but only on the days where cycling takes place (ten sessions).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ingeborg D Welters, University of Liverpool
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- UoL001367
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Muscle Weakness
-
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital CenterCompletedFall Risk | Quadriceps Muscle Weakness | Adductor Muscle WeaknessUnited States
-
Lactomason Co., Ltd.RecruitingAge-Related Muscle WeaknessSouth Korea
-
Healthbiome IncCompletedAge-Related Muscle WeaknessSouth Korea
-
Eastern Mediterranean UniversityCompletedPelvic Floor Muscle WeaknessCyprus
-
Association Pro-arteActive, not recruitingWeakness, Muscle | AmyotrophiaFrance
-
University of Central ArkansasCompletedPelvic Floor Muscle WeaknessUnited States
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyRecruitingPhysical Disability | Muscle Atrophy or Weakness | Muscle Loss | Physical Inactivity | Delirium in Old Age | Hospital Acquired Condition | Weakness, MuscleUnited States
-
Spitalul Clinic de Boli Infecțioase și Pneumoftiziologie...CompletedMuscle Weakness | Muscle Weakness Condition | CopdRomania
-
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Electrical Stimulation...Medical University of Vienna; European Union; Comenius University; Ministry of...CompletedMuscle Weakness Condition | Therapy EffectAustria, Slovakia
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterTerminatedMuscle Cramp | Statin Adverse Reaction | Weakness, Muscle | AcheUnited States
Clinical Trials on Cycling with FES
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalAgência Brasileira de Desenvolvimento Industrial (Brazilian Agency For Industrial...Not yet recruitingBrain Injuries | Spinal Cord Injuries | Muscle AtrophyBrazil
-
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child...Shriners Hospitals for ChildrenCompletedCerebral Palsy Spastic DiplegiaUnited States
-
UGECAM Rhône-AlpesRecruitingHemiparesis;Poststroke/CVAFrance
-
Arizona State UniversityCompletedType2 Diabetes | Disability PhysicalUnited States
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneLaboratoire de Physique ENS de LyonCompleted
-
University of OttawaThe Ottawa Hospital; Multiple Sclerosis Society of CanadaCompleted
-
William Carey UniversityUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center; University of Southern MississippiCompletedSpinal Cord InjuriesUnited States
-
University Hospital, RouenCompleted
-
Glasgow Caledonian UniversityNHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeCompletedSpinal Cord Injuries (SCI) | Upper Limb FunctionUnited Kingdom
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityTerminated