- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04688424
FES Assisted Cycling in Children With CP (CP FES Cycling)
Functional Electrical Stimulation Assisted Cycling to Improve Fitness and Strength in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Aim 1: To compare the effects of 8-weeks of FES-assisted cycling training on improving cardiorespiratory fitness, walking function, self-motivated exercise/recreation, self-perception and functional mobility and quality of life of adolescents with spastic CP with marginal walking ability (Gross Motor Function Classification System Levels II - IV) vs. 8-weeks of volitional cycling training and a non-intervention control group.
Aim 2: To compare the effects of 8-weeks FES-assisted cycling training on changes in cycling ability of adolescents with spastic CP with marginal walking ability vs. 8-weeks of volitional cycling training and a nonintervention control group.
Aim 3: To elucidate the mechanisms for potential improvements in cycling ability after 8-weeks of FES-assisted or volitional cycling training of adolescents with spastic CP and marginal walking ability.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19140
- Shriners Hospitals fof Children, Philadelphia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Spastic CP (di-, tetra-, or triplegic)
- Level II, III or IV GMFCS classification
- Sufficient covering of the femoral head in the acetabulum (migration % < 40)
- Adequate range of motion of the hips, knees and ankles to allow pedaling
- Visual, perceptual, cognitive, and communication skills to follow multiple step commands for attending to exercise and data collection
- Seizure-free or well controlled seizures
Exclusion Criteria:
- Athetoid, ataxic, or hemiplegic CP
- Significant scoliosis (primary curve > 40°)
- Spinal fusions extending into the pelvis
- Severe tactile hypersensitivity
- Joint instability or dislocation in LE
- LE surgery or fractures in the past year
- Botox injections to LE in the past 6 months
- Severe spasticity in LE (Mod Ashworth 4)
- LE joint pain during cycling
- Hx of pulmonary disease limiting exercise tolerance or Hx of cardiac disease
- Severely limited ROM / contractures that prevent the subject from being able to be safely positioned on the cycle
- Pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: FES + Cycling
Functional electrical stimulation cycling group
|
FES will be applied via surface electrodes placed over bilateral quadriceps muscles.
FES-stimulation will be ramped from sensory level (the level at which the individual feels a cutaneous sensation from the stimulation) to the maximum-tolerated level using a closed loop system controlled by computer software Subjects will exercise at home, three times per week, with FES on for 8 weeks with a goal of attaining 30 minutes of continuous cycling per session.
If the individuals are unable to cycle for 30 continuous minutes, rest breaks will be provided with a goal of cycling for a total of 30 minutes.
The length of each session will be approximately 45 minutes, with 15 minutes of set-up and 30 minutes of cycling.
Subjects will exercise at home, three times per week, without FES for 8 weeks with a goal of attaining 30 minutes of continuous cycling per session.
If the individuals are unable to cycle for 30 continuous minutes, rest breaks will be provided with a goal of cycling for a total of 30 minutes.
The length of each session will be approximately 45 minutes, with 15 minutes of set-up and 30 minutes of cycling.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Cycling only
Volitional cycling group (no electrical stimulation)
|
Subjects will exercise at home, three times per week, without FES for 8 weeks with a goal of attaining 30 minutes of continuous cycling per session.
If the individuals are unable to cycle for 30 continuous minutes, rest breaks will be provided with a goal of cycling for a total of 30 minutes.
The length of each session will be approximately 45 minutes, with 15 minutes of set-up and 30 minutes of cycling.
|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
control group
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in cycling Ability
Time Frame: Outcome assessed: Pre Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), Post Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
Change in cycling cadence from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up will be assessed.
|
Outcome assessed: Pre Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), Post Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
|
Change in Energy Expenditure
Time Frame: Outcome assessed: Pre Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), Post Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
Energy expenditure is a measure of cardiovascular fitness.
Change in energy expenditure from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up will be assessed.
|
Outcome assessed: Pre Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), Post Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
|
Change in Gait speed
Time Frame: Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
Gait speed will be measured using a GAITRite Portable Walkway System (CIR Systems Inc; Havertown, PA).
We will measure the change in gait speed from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
|
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
|
Change in Spatiotemporal gait parameter
Time Frame: Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
Step length will be measured using a GAITRite Portable Walkway System (CIR Systems Inc; Havertown, PA).
We will measure the change in step length from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
|
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
|
Change in Muscle Strength
Time Frame: Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
Isometric maximum voluntary exertion testing of hip extensors & flexors, knee extensors & flexors, and ankle plantarflexors.
We will measure the change in isometric maximum voluntary exertion from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
|
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
|
Change in Walking Distance
Time Frame: Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
6 minute walk test (6MWT) measures walking distance.
Walking distance (in a fixed period of time) is an indicator of endurance.
We will measure the change in walking distance from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
|
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
|
Change in Timed Up-And-Go
Time Frame: Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
Timed Up-And-Go (TUG) is a measure of functional mobility and will allow for assessing the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics.
We will measure the change in TUG test from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
|
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
|
Change in Pedometer measurement
Time Frame: Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
Pedometer measurements to allow an unbiased report of the subject's activity level at home and in the community.
We will measure the change in pedometer measurements from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
|
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
|
Change in Electromyography
Time Frame: Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
Muscle activation timing measured with electromyography (EMG) during analysis allows for mechanistic study of anticipated improvements in motor control as well as comparison to typical norms.
We will measure the change in EMG from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
|
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
|
Change in Self-Assessment
Time Frame: Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is a 10 point scale to rate one's own level of performance and satisfaction with performance. 1 mean poor performance low satisfaction and 10 means very good performance high satisfaction.
We will measure the change in COPM scores from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
|
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
|
Change in Health related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
The KINDL questionnaire is administered to measure changes in health-related quality of life.
The questionnaire is completed by the adolescent and a caregiver.
The KINDL standard scale and "Disease Module" is administered.
The standard scale contains 24 items comprised of Physical, Emotional, Self-Esteem, Family, Friends and School sub-scales.
The 6-item "Disease Module" that measures the child's and caregiver's perceptions about CP.
Scores for each item ranges from 1-5.
The total score is the sum of all item scores, transformed to a 0-100 scale.
Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
We will measure the change in KINDL scores from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
|
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
|
Change in Self-Perception
Time Frame: Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
Self-Perception (Piers-Harris-2) survey measures physical and emotional well-being and self-esteem and will allow assessment of the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics from training.
We will measure the change in Piers-Harris scores from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
|
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Samuel Lee, PT, PhD, Physical Therapy Department, University of Delaware
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 5R01HD062588-02 (NIH)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia
-
Suleyman Demirel UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesNot yet recruitingSpastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyPakistan
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Spastic DiplegiaEgypt
-
Wroclaw University of Health and Sport SciencesNot yet recruitingSpastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy | Spastic HemiplegiaPoland
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownSpastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic | Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia | Cerebral Palsy Quadriplegic | Cerebral Palsy, MonoplegicTurkey
-
University of LahoreCompletedCerebral Palsy (CP) | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy | Balance | Gross Motor FunctionsPakistan
-
TC Erciyes UniversityEnrolling by invitationCerebral Palsy (CP) | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy | Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyTurkey
-
Amira saad mohamedActive, not recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on FES
-
University of AlbertaRoyal Alexandra Hospital; Glenrose FoundationCompletedAcute Spinal Cord InjuryCanada
-
United States Department of DefenseVirginia Commonwealth University; James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical... and other collaboratorsCompletedSpinal Cord InjuriesUnited States
-
Kessler FoundationUnknown
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusRecruitingCritical Illness Myopathy | Critical Illness PolyneuropathyItaly
-
Universidade Federal de Santa MariaCompleted
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignTerminatedComplication of DialysisUnited States
-
Unity Health TorontoActive, not recruiting
-
Federal University of Health Science of Porto AlegreCompletedErectile Dysfunction
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusFondazione Italiana Sclerosi MultiplaNot yet recruiting
-
Craig HospitalNational Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation...Enrolling by invitationCervical Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States