Intravenous (IV) Versus Oral Iron Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in the Post-operative Bariatric Surgical Patient

A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Comparator Trial of IV vs Oral Iron Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in the Post-operative Bariatric Surgical Patient

The aim of the study is to compare two accepted treatments for iron deficiency anemia (oral ferrous sulfate and intravenous ferumoxytol) for efficacy and speed of response in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in the post-operative bariatric surgical patient. In this study, 104 bariatric surgical post-operative patients will be randomly assigned 52 each to oral or 52 to a single dose IV iron treatment using double-blind procedures.

Study Overview

• Status: Withdrawn
• Conditions: IDA in the Post-bariatric Surgical Patient
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Ferumoxytol; Other: Oral vitamin C; Drug: Ferrous sulfate; Other: Intravenous normal saline

Detailed Description

Rationale for study: The preponderance of published evidence reports superior efficacy and decreased toxicity of intravenous iron compared to oral iron in correcting anemia and iron parameters in published trials of bariatric surgery patients. Intravenous, and not oral, iron ensures adequate delivery and avoids gastrointestinal toxicities, which may be especially burdensome in these patients who require optimal levels of energy to maintain prudent exercise programs recommended by patients' bariatric practitioners. Uncontradicted published evidence reports safety and efficacy of complete replacement doses of intravenous iron administered in one or two doses of either low molecular weight iron dextran, ferumoxytol, ferric carboxymaltose or iron isomaltoside. A common feature of all studies extant is the lack of reported serious adverse events. Even in patients with minimally invasive procedures such as gastric banding or stapling in whom oral iron may be tolerated, given the often present multiple gastrointestinal perturbations, intravenous iron may simplify care.

Drugs used: The investigators propose to use and FDA approved IV iron preparation - ferumoxytol, administered as two doses (over a interval of 2 to 7 days), each 510 mg over fifteen minutes based on published prospective safety and efficacy data and compare the effectiveness of the treatment to the American Metabolic and Bariatric Associations recommended treatment for iron deficiency anemia in the post-operative bariatric patients of oral iron ferrous sulphate 325 mg twice daily for 6 weeks.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Phase: Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Aged ≥ 18 years
• Patients who have undergone a Roux-en Y Gastric Bypass or Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy and are at least 3 months or more out from surgery.
• Iron deficiency anemia defined as iron deficient with either ferritin < 20 mcg/l, transferrin saturation (TSAT) < 19%, or anemia with Hgb < 13 g/dL for both males and females.
• Willingness to use contraceptive to avoid pregnancy: Women have to be surgically sterile, post menopausal or use one of the following contraceptives during the whole study period and after the study has ended for at least five times the plasma biological half-life of the investigational medicinal product: intrauterine devices or hormonal contraceptives (contraceptive pills, implants, transdermal patches, hormonal vaginal devices, or injections with prolonged release).
• Willingness to participate and signing the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Iron overload or disturbances in utilization of iron (e.g. hemochromatosis and hemosiderosis)
• Decompensated liver cirrhosis or active hepatitis (ALT > 3 times upper limit of normal)
• Serum ferritin > 500 ng/mL or transferrin saturation > 40%
• Active acute or chronic infections (assessed by clinical judgment that may be indicated by White Blood Cells (WBC) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) when these are available)
• Rheumatoid arthritis with symptoms or signs of active inflammation
• Pregnant and nursing women
• History of multiple allergies
• Known hypersensitivity to ferumoxytol or oral iron or any excipients in the drug products
• Previous IV iron treatment for IDA
• Other iron treatment or blood transfusion within 4 weeks prior to the screening or treatment visit
• Planned elective surgery during the study
• Any other medical condition that, in the opinion of Investigator, may cause the subject to be unsuitable for the completion of the study or place the subject at potential risk from being in the study, e.g. a malignancy, uncontrolled hypertension, unstable ischemic heart disease, or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Quadruple

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: IV iron; Ferumoxytol intravenous (IV) 1020 mg as - 2 vials of 510 mg (510 mg IV over 15 minutes) each given 2-7 days apart. Participants in this group will also receive oral vitamin C as a placebo.	Drug: Ferumoxytol; treatment of iron deficiency anemia with IV iron.; Other: Oral vitamin C; Oral vitamin C to be used as a placebo for participants receiving IV iron
Active Comparator: oral iron; Ferrous sulfate 325 mg (oral) tabs morning and evening. Participants in this group will also receive intravenous normal saline as a placebo.	Drug: Ferrous sulfate; treatment of iron deficiency anemia with oral iron; Other: Intravenous normal saline; Intravenous normal saline will be used as placebo for participants receiving oral iron

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Resolution of anemia in oral vs. IV iron as assessed by Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - 2 score	The CGI-2 is a one-item questionnaire which asks how participants feel now compared to before receiving treatment. It has a scoring of 1 to 7 with 1 meaning much better and 7 meaning very much worse	6 weeks
Resolution of anemia in oral vs. IV iron as assessed by ferritin level	Participants will be assessed after six weeks to see if there is a resolution of anemia following the treatment with oral or IV iron. This will be determined by the ferritin level. Ferritin > 20% will be the cutoff for resolution of anemia.	6 weeks
Resolution of anemia in oral vs. IV iron as assessed by TSAT	Participants will be assessed after six weeks to see if there is a resolution of anemia following the treatment with oral or IV iron. This will be determined by TSAT level. TSAT > 19% will be the cutoff for resolution of anemia.	6 weeks
Time (weeks) to treatment response as assessed by CGI-2 score	The CGI-2 is a one-item questionnaire which asks how participants feel now compared to before receiving treatment. It has a scoring of 1 to 7 with 1 meaning much better and 7 meaning very much worse. This will be used in assessing the time in weeks when participant noticed a change after receiving treatment.	6 weeks
Time (weeks) to treatment response as assessed by ferritin level	Participants will be assessed after six weeks to identify what time (in weeks) ferritin level was > 20% following the treatment with oral or IV iron	6 weeks
Time (weeks) to treatment response as assessed by TSAT	Participants will be assessed after six weeks to identify what time (in weeks) TSAT level was > 19% following the treatment with oral or IV iron	6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Need for continued treatment as assessed by ferritin level	Participants will be assessed after a year to see if participants require continued treatment following the treatment with oral or IV iron. This will be determined by the ferritin level. Ferritin > 20% will be the cutoff for no further need for treatment.	1 year
Need for continued treatment as assessed by TSAT	Participants will be assessed after a year to see if participants require continued treatment following the treatment with oral or IV iron. This will be determined by TSAT level. TSAT > 19% will be the cutoff for no further need for treatment.	1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Johns Hopkins University
• Collaborators: AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Kimberley E Steele, MD, Ph.D, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Anticipated): August 1, 2019
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): October 1, 2021
• Study Completion (Anticipated): September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: December 14, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: December 14, 2018
• First Posted (Actual): December 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): September 11, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 9, 2019
• Last Verified: September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Metabolic Diseases; Hematologic Diseases; Anemia, Hypochromic; Anemia; Iron Metabolism Disorders; Anemia, Iron-Deficiency; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action; Protective Agents; Micronutrients; Vitamins; Antioxidants; Hematinics; Pharmaceutical Solutions; Parenteral Nutrition Solutions; Ferrosoferric Oxide; Ascorbic Acid
• Other Study ID Numbers: IRB00198735

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No