- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03778307
Key Dimensions of PTSD and ED
July 22, 2026 updated by: Jennifer A. Sumner, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles
Key Dimensions of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Endothelial Dysfunction (ED)
This study will test whether endothelial dysfunction could be the early subclinical mechanism by which posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) increases cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, and whether posttraumatic fear-a key component of PTSD-or another PTSD dimension could be the target to offset that risk.
The results of this study may help trauma-exposed individuals who are at risk of having CVD events.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) increases risk of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) by 25-50%.
Most individuals (50-90%) experience a traumatic event in their lifetime, and PTSD is the fifth most common psychiatric disorder.
Experts have now called for increased CVD surveillance after trauma and for PTSD treatment trials powered to reduce CVD risk.
However, both CVD risk and PTSD are complex phenomena that likely interact in nuanced ways.
This study will determine which PTSD dimension(s) contribute to endothelial dysfunction, one of the earliest modifiable precursors to CVD.
The investigators will examine cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of PTSD and its underlying dimensions with functional and, secondarily, cellular measures of endothelial dysfunction (FMD and circulating endothelial cell-derived microparticles, respectively) in a community-dwelling sample of CVD-free adult men and women with a history of trauma (50% with current PTSD).
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
168
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
- UCLA
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Trauma-exposed adults without a history of cardiovascular disease recruited from the community
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18+ years
- History of exposure to a psychological trauma (e.g., natural disaster, physical assault)
- Fluent in English
- Willing to and capable of providing informed consent
Additional Inclusion Criteria for the PTSD Group
- Diagnosed with current PTSD (duration of at least 1 month) using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5th Edition (DSM-5) (CAPS-5) at the diagnostic interview assessment
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of CVD (i.e., diagnosis of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, peripheral artery disease, or stroke)
- Deemed unable to comply with the protocol (either self-selected or by indicating during screening that could not complete all requested tasks)
- Current bipolar disorder or psychotic disorder
- Mild or more severe cognitive impairment [Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE)3 score ≤18]
- Current moderate or severe substance use disorder
- Acute, unstable, or severe medical disorder or pregnancy
- Deemed to need immediate psychiatric intervention (e.g., active suicidality)
- Use of antipsychotic, mood stabilizer, antidepressant, or stimulant medication in the past 4 weeks
- Daily benzodiazepine use in the past 2 weeks
Additional Exclusion Criteria for the Trauma-Exposed Matched Control Group
- Current or past diagnosis of any DSM-5 psychiatric disorder
- CAPS-5 total score ≥25
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Trauma exposed without PTSD
Individuals with a history of trauma exposure who do not have current PTSD
|
Behavioral task to assess psychophysiological measures of fear
Behavioral task to assess dysphoria-relevant attention allocation
|
|
Trauma exposed with PTSD
Individuals with a history of trauma exposure and a current diagnosis of PTSD
|
Behavioral task to assess psychophysiological measures of fear
Behavioral task to assess dysphoria-relevant attention allocation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Flow-mediated Dilation of the Brachial Artery (FMD) %
Time Frame: Baseline
|
FMD is the percent difference in diameter of the brachial artery, before and after occlusion.
Impaired endothelial function occurs when blood vessels are unable to dilate fully in response to nitric oxide synthesis and release, which is manifested as impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation (i.e., lower FMD).
Lower FMD has been associated with the degree of coronary atherosclerosis and predicts CVD events.
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Circulating Endothelial Cell-derived Microparticles (EMPs) Expressing CD62E
Time Frame: Baseline
|
EMPs expressing CD62E (i.e., endothelial cell activation) and CD31 (i.e., endothelial cell apoptosis) will be measured.
Assessments of circulating EMPs will be measured using flow cytometry, and total flow cytometry counts will be converted to the number of EMPs per uL of blood.
Higher concentrations of EMPs expressing CD62E and CD31 indicate greater endothelial dysfunction.
|
Baseline
|
|
Circulating Endothelial Cell-derived Microparticles (EMPs) Expressing CD31
Time Frame: Baseline
|
EMPs expressing CD62E (i.e., endothelial cell activation) and CD31 (i.e., endothelial cell apoptosis) will be measured.
Assessments of circulating EMPs will be measured using flow cytometry, and total flow cytometry counts will be converted to the number of EMPs per uL of blood.
Higher concentrations of EMPs expressing CD62E and CD31 indicate greater endothelial dysfunction.
|
Baseline
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fear Load Based on Fear-potentiated Startle During Early Extinction
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Fear-potentiated startle (FPS) to the danger cue (CS+) during early extinction as part of a fear acquisition and extinction paradigm; this measure reflects expression of conditioned fear during early extinction.
FPS is measured through corrugator and orbicularis electromyography (EMG).
Startle magnitude is assessed as the peak amplitude (in microVolts) of EMG contraction 20-200ms following the startle probe.
A difference score for FPS is calculated by subtracting the startle magnitude to the noise alone probe from the startle magnitude to the CS to account for individual differences in startle magnitude and habituation.
Higher values of this FPS difference score indicate greater fear load (i.e., greater overexpression of conditioned fear to a now safe signal during early extinction), which has been associated with PTSD.
|
Baseline
|
|
Averaged Total Dwell Time for Happy Faces
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Averaged total dwell time of the happy faces Area of Interest (AOI) across 60 face matrices; reflects continuous gaze allocation to happy stimuli
|
Baseline
|
|
Averaged Total Dwell Time for Sad Faces
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Averaged total dwell time of the sad faces Area of Interest (AOI) across 60 face matrices; reflects continuous gaze allocation to sad stimuli
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jennifer A Sumner, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 20, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 30, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
June 30, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 7, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 14, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
December 19, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 24, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 22, 2026
Last Verified
July 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AAAR8563
- R01HL139614 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.