An Open-label, Dose Escalation Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of HMPL-523 in Patients With Lymphoma

January 30, 2026 updated by: Hutchmed

A Phase I, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Efficacy of HMPL-523 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoma

This is a Phase I, open-label, multicenter study of HMPL-523 administered orally to patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma who have exhausted approved therapy options. This study consists of a dose escalation stage (Stage1) and a dose expansion stage (Stage 2).

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a Phase I, open-label, multicenter study of HMPL-523 administered orally to patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma who have exhausted approved therapy options. This study consists of a dose escalation stage (Stage1) and a dose expansion stage (Stage 2).

Dose Escalation Stage (Stage 1)

Dosing will begin at 100 mg once daily (QD). A cycle of study treatment will be defined as 28 days of continuous dosing. The modified 3+3 design will be applied for dose escalation and MTD determination to limit the number of patients exposed to potentially ineffective or unsafe doses. The study will enroll 1 patient and the patient will be treated for a 28-day cycle in the initial dose cohort. If there is no Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) and no more than 2 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade ≥2 in the first treatment cycle, the study will be escalated to the next dose cohort and continue with the standard 3+3 design. Otherwise, the trial will revert to a standard 3+3 design from the initial dose cohort. A minimum of 3 patients will be enrolled and observed for toxicity in each successive dose cohort after the initial dose cohort. If the 3 patients initially enrolled in a given dose cohort complete the DLT assessment window (Cycle 1, Days 1-28) without experiencing a DLT, 3 patients will be enrolled at the next higher dose level. If 2 or more of the initial 3 patients enrolled at any dose level experience a DLT during the DLT assessment window, the dose escalation will be halted. If 1 of the initial 3 patients enrolled at any dose level experiences a DLT during the DLT assessment window, additional patients will be enrolled at that dose level for a minimum of 6 evaluable patients for DLT. If a DLT is observed in 1 of the 6 valuable patients at this dose level, dose escalation will proceed to the next pre- defined dose level. If DLTs are observed in 2 or more of the 6 evaluable patients at a given dose level, the dose escalation will be halted. If the dose escalation is completed due to 2 or more DLTs at a dose level and that dose level is ≥50% higher than the previous dose level, then an intermediate dose level may be evaluated for toxicity in the same manner as described above. If the dose level is <50% higher than the previous dose level, in which only 3 DLT evaluable patients were enrolled, 3 additional patients will be enrolled at that dose level to comprise 6 DLT evaluable patients.

The proposed dose escalation scheme comprises Cohorts 1 to 5 with dosing levels of 100 mg QD, 200 mg QD, 400 mg QD, 600 mg QD and 800 mg QD, respectively. The need for dose escalation beyond 800 mg QD, the specific dose to be tested and the potential for twice-daily (BID) dosing will be evaluated jointly by investigators and the sponsor based on the cumulative clinical safety, pharmacokinetic, and preliminary efficacy data. Safety monitoring and evaluation of dose escalation will be carried out by the Safety Review Committee, which will be comprised of the sponsor's study team members (including medical monitor, safety monitor and and Pharmacokinetic scientist) and the site principal investigators. The adverse event profile and serum concentration of HMPL-523 data will be evaluated to determine whether it is safe to continue the assigned HMPL-523 dose for dose escalation or whether the dose should be de-escalated to the lower dose level.

Dose Expansion Stage (Stage 2)

The adverse event profile, serum concentration, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of HMPL-523 at the maximum tolerated dose(MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose(RP2D) will be further evaluated in approximately 50 patients with relapsed or refractory indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. The tumor types of the dose expansion stage are restricted to:

  • 10 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma
  • 20 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma post-BTK exposure
  • 10 patients with mantle cell lymphoma
  • 20 patients with follicular lymphoma (Grade 1-3a)
  • 10 patients with marginal zone lymphoma
  • 10 patients with waldenström's macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma
  • 10 patients with peripheral T- cell lymphoma
  • 10 patients with cutaneous B-cell lymphoma
  • 10 patients with hodgkin lymphoma

Patients will receive HMPL-523 at the MTD/RP2D for continuous 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity, at investigator's discretion that the patient can no longer benefit from the study treatment, patient withdrawal from the study, or the end of study, whichever comes first.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

69

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus, Denmark
        • Aarhus University Hospital
      • Helsinki, Finland, 00029
        • Helsingin Yliopistollinen Keskussairaala
      • Tampere, Finland, 33520
        • Tampereen yliopistollinen sairaala
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France
        • CHU Clermont Ferrand - Hôpital d'Estaing
      • Créteil, France
        • Hôpital Henri Mondor
      • Paris, France
        • Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere
      • Poitiers, France
        • CHU Poitiers - Hôpital la Milétrie
      • Monza, Italy
        • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Di Monza (Presidio San Gerardo)
    • Bergamo
      • Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy, 24127
        • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII (Presidio Papa Giovanni XXIII)
    • Milano
      • Milan, Milano, Italy, 20132
        • Ospedale San Raffaele
      • Biała Podlaska, Poland
        • KO-MED Centra Kliniczne
      • Gdansk, Poland
        • Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne
      • Torun, Poland
        • Nasz Lekarz Przychodnie Medyczne
      • Wroclaw, Poland, 50566
        • Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny im. Jana Mikulicza Radeckiego
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Institut Catala D'oncologia
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Ico Badalona - Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol
      • Madrid, Spain, 28034
        • Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Fundación Jiménez Díaz
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Md Anderson Cancer Centre
      • Seville, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
      • Seville, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
    • California
      • Anaheim, California, United States, 92801
        • Pacific Cancer Medical Center, Inc.
      • Downey, California, United States, 90241
        • Innovative Clinical Research Institute
      • Oxnard, California, United States, 93030
        • Ventura County Hematology-Oncology Specialists
    • New Jersey
      • Florham Park, New Jersey, United States, 07932
        • Summit Medical Group
    • New York
      • New Hyde Park, New York, United States, 11042
        • Clinical Research Alliance
    • North Carolina
      • Greenville, North Carolina, United States, 27834
        • Leo Jenkins Cancer Center/ECU School of Medicine
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
      • The Woodlands, Texas, United States, 77380
        • Renovatio Clinical

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients must meet the following criteria to be eligible for study entry:

  1. Signed informed consent form (ICF).
  2. Age ≥18 years.
  3. ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.
  4. Histologically confirmed lymphoma, including Hodgkin's lymphoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In the dose expansion stage, the tumor types may be restricted to any or all of the following tumor types. There may be approximately 10 patients in each cohort depending on response signals suggesting efficacy, except for 2 identified cohorts with approximately 20 patients per cohort: relapsed or refractory CLL/SLL, CLL/SLL post-BTK exposure (n=20), MCL, FL (Grade 1-3a) (n=20), MZL, WM/LPL, PTCL,CBCL, and/or HL
  5. Patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma who have exhausted all approved therapy options.
  6. In the dose expansion stage, patients must have measurable disease for an objective response assessment, except for patients with CLL and WM/LPL
  7. Availability of tumor sample for patients in dose expansion cohorts: This may be an archival tissue sample obtained after most recent therapy or a fresh biopsy; if tumor sample is not available, the Sponsor may waive the requirement after discussion
  8. Expected survival of more than 24 weeks as determined by the investigator.
  9. Male patients must agree to use a condom and female patients of childbearing potential must agree to use highly effective contraceptive measures for 30 days after the last dose of study drug. These include as combined hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, and transdermal), progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable, and implantable), intrauterine contraceptive device, intrauterine hormone release system, bilateral tubal occlusion, or a vasectomized partner, provided that male partner is the sole sexual partner of the female patient. Postmenopausal females (women who have not had menses for at least 1 year without an alternative medical cause) are exempt from this criterion.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Patients with primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma.
  2. Any of the following laboratory abnormalities: Absolute neutrophil count<1.0×10^9/L, Hemoglobin <80 g/L, Platelets <50×10^9/L
  3. Inadequate organ function, defined by the following: Total bilirubin >1.5 times the upper limit of normal (× ULN), aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase >2.5 × ULN, Estimated Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) per Cockcroft-Gault [Dose Escalation portion of trial (Stage 1) CrCl < 40 mL/min, Dose Expansion portion of trial (Stage 2) CrCl < 30 mL/min], Serum amylase or lipase >ULN, International normalized ratio >1.5 × ULN, or activated partial thromboplastin time >1.5 × ULN
  4. Patients with clinically detectable second primary malignant tumors at enrollment or other malignant tumors within the last 2 years (with the exception of radically treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, in situ cervix, or in situ breast cancer).
  5. Any anticancer therapy, including chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, biologic therapy, vaccine, or radiotherapy within 3 weeks prior to the initiation of study treatment.
  6. Herbal therapy within 1 week prior to the initiation of study treatment.
  7. Prior use of any anti-cancer vaccine
  8. Prior treatment with any spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitors (eg, fostamatinib)
  9. Prior administration of radioimmunotherapy within 3 months before initiation of study treatment.
  10. Use of strong cytochrome P450 isoform 3A inhibitors and inducers and drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450 isoform 3A, cytochrome P450 isoform 2B6, and cytochrome P450 isoform 1A2, and are identified as narrow therapeutic drugs within 7 days or 3 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to initiation of study treatment
  11. Adverse events from prior anticancer therapy that have not resolved to Grade ≤1, except for alopecia.
  12. Prior autologous stem cell transplant within 6 months prior to the initiation of study treatment.
  13. Prior allogeneic stem cell transplant within 6 months prior to the initiation of study treatment or with any evidence of active graft versus host disease or requirement for immunosuppressants within 28 days prior to the initiation of study treatment.
  14. Clinically significant active infection (eg, pneumonia).
  15. Major surgical procedure within 4 weeks prior to the initiation of study treatment.
  16. Clinically significant history of liver disease, including cirrhosis, current alcohol abuse, or current known active infection with human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus.
  17. Pregnant (positive serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin test) or lactating women.
  18. New York Heart Association Class II or greater congestive heart failure.
  19. Congenital long QT syndrome or correct QT interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) >480 msec
  20. Current use of medication known to cause QT prolongation or Torsades de Pointes
  21. History of myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 6 months prior to the initiation of study treatment.
  22. History of stroke or transient ischemic attack within 6 months prior to the initiation of study treatment.
  23. Inability to take oral medication, prior surgical procedures affecting absorption, or active peptic ulcer disease.
  24. Treatment in a clinical study within 30 days prior to the initiation of study treatment.
  25. Any other diseases, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding that, in the investigator's opinion, gives reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates the use of an investigational drug, may affect the interpretation of the results, or renders the patient at high risk from treatment complications.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment
All patients to received study drug (HMPL-523)
Oral HMPL-523

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dose Escalation Stage: Number of Patients With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Time Frame: From the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to Day 28 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was 28 days)
A DLT was defined as the occurrence of any of the following treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during the DLT assessment window, unless clearly unrelated to the study treatment. AEs were graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0: non-hematologic toxicity: all non-hematologic TEAEs of Grade 3 or greater with the exception of Grade 3 nausea or vomiting controlled by supportive therapy; hematologic toxicity: Grade 4 neutropenia >5 days, Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding or which required platelets transfusion, Grade >=3 febrile neutropenia (defined as absolute neutrophil count <1000/cubic millimeter with a single temperature >38.3 degree Celsius [°C] or a sustained temperature of >=38°C for more than 1 hour), Grade 4 anemia not explained by underlying disease; any TEAE that required a dose delay of >=15 days; any case of Hy's Law.
From the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to Day 28 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was 28 days)
Dose Escalation Stage: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Treatment Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Interruption, Treatment Reduction and Treatment Discontinuation
Time Frame: From the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, approximately 29 months
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study patient temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs with an onset date on or after the first dose of study treatment and no later than 30 days after the date of last study treatment administration or start of a new treatment of anti-neoplasm therapy, whichever was earlier. Treatment related AEs were the TEAEs that were reported as related to study treatment by the Investigator.
From the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, approximately 29 months
Dose Escalation Stage: Recommended Phase 2 Dose of HMPL-523
Time Frame: From the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to Day 28 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was 28 days)
RP2D was based on the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability assessments in dose escalation stage patients.
From the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to Day 28 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was 28 days)
Dose Expansion Stage: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
ORR:percentage of patients who had best overall response (BOR) with complete response (CR),CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi),nodular partial response (nPR) or PR for CLL patients; CR, very good PR(VGPR), PR or minor response(MR) for WM patients; CR or PR for patients with disease type other than CLL and WM. BOR:best response from start of treatment until progression or any further anticancer therapy.CR:absence of serum(S) monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig)M, normal S IgM, complete resolution of extramedullary disease,morphologically normal bone marrow aspirate and trephine biopsy. CRi:criteria fulfilled for CR but persistent cytopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia or neutropenia. nPR:patients with residual CLL cells. PR, VGPR, MR:detectable monoclonal IgM,no new signs/symptoms of active disease and PR:>=50% but <90% reduction in S IgM,reduction in extramedullary disease,VGPR: >=90% reduction in S IgM, complete resolution of extramedullary disease, MR: >=25% but <50% reduction in S IgM.
Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
Dose Expansion Stage: Complete Response Rate
Time Frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
CR rate was defined as the percentage of patients who had BOR with CR or CRi for CLL patients, and CR only for other patients. BOR was defined as the best response from start of treatment until progression or any further anticancer therapy. CR was defined as the absence of serum monoclonal IgM, normal serum IgM, complete resolution of extramedullary disease, morphologically normal bone marrow aspirate and trephine biopsy. CRi was defined as the criteria fulfilled for CR but persistent cytopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia or neutropenia.
Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
Dose Expansion Stage: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Time Frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
CBR was defined as the percentage of patients who had BOR of stable disease (SD) or better. BOR was defined as the best response from start of treatment until progression or any further anticancer therapy. SD was defined as detectable monoclonal IgM, <25% reduction and <25% increase in serum IgM level, no progression in extramedullary disease, no new signs/symptoms of active disease.
Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
Dose Expansion Stage: Duration of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
DOR: time from when first response (CR, CRi, PR, nPR, VGPR, PR-L, and MR) was achieved until earlier of first documentation of definitive PD or death from any cause. CR: absence of S monoclonal IgM, normal S IgM, complete resolution of extramedullary disease, morphologically normal bone marrow aspirate and trephine biopsy. CRi: criteria fulfilled for CR but persistent cytopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia or neutropenia. nPR: patients with residual CLL cells. PR-L: patients achieved PR with CLL-related signs/symptoms other than lymphocytosis and continued on therapy. PR, VGPR,MR:detectable monoclonal IgM,no new signs/symptoms of active disease and PR: >=50% but <90% reduction in S IgM,reduction in extramedullary disease,VGPR: >=90% reduction in S IgM,complete resolution of extramedullary disease,MR: >=25% but <50% reduction in S IgM. PD: >=25% increase in S IgM level from lowest nadir and/or progression in clinical features attributable to disease.
Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
Dose Expansion Stage: Time to Response (TTR)
Time Frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
TTR was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the first occurrence of CR, CRi, PR, nPR, VGPR, PR-L, or MR. CR: absence of serum monoclonal IgM, normal serum IgM, complete resolution of extramedullary disease, morphologically normal bone marrow aspirate and trephine biopsy. CRi: criteria fulfilled for CR but persistent cytopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia or neutropenia. nPR: patients with residual CLL cells. PR-L: patients achieved PR with CLL-related signs/symptoms other than lymphocytosis and continued on therapy. PR, VGPR, MR: detectable monoclonal IgM, no new signs/symptoms of active disease and PR: >=50% but <90% reduction in serum IgM, reduction in extramedullary disease, VGPR: >=90% reduction in serum IgM, complete resolution of extramedullary disease, MR: >=25% but <50% reduction in serum IgM. Kaplan Meier analysis included only the responders.
Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
Dose Expansion Stage: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
PFS was defined as the time from the date of first study treatment to the earliest date of PD or death due to any reason whichever occurred first. PD was defined as >=25% increase in serum IgM level from lowest nadir and/or progression in clinical features attributable to disease.
Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dose Escalation Stage and Dose Expansion Stage: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of HMPL-523
Time Frame: Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 1, 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 28 of Cycle 1
Blood samples were collected to determine Cmax of HMPL-523. The PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis. Eventually, the patients discontinued as they progressed in the study. Hence, fewer patients at each cycle and no patients returned on Cycle 1 Day 28 in dose expansion stage: MZL arm.
Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 1, 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 28 of Cycle 1
Dose Escalation Stage and Dose Expansion Stage: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of HMPL-523
Time Frame: Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 1, 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 28 of Cycle 1
Blood samples were collected to determine tmax of HMPL-523. The PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis. Eventually, the patients discontinued as they progressed in the study. Hence, fewer patients at each cycle and no patients returned on Cycle 1 Day 28 in dose expansion stage: MZL arm.
Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 1, 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 28 of Cycle 1
Dose Escalation Stage and Dose Expansion Stage: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero (Pre-Dose) to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) of HMPL-523
Time Frame: Dose escalation and dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Blood samples were collected to determine AUC0-t of HMPL-523. The PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis.
Dose escalation and dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Dose Escalation Stage and Dose Expansion Stage: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During a Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of HMPL-523
Time Frame: Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 1, 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 28 of Cycle 1
Blood samples were collected to determine AUCtau of HMPL-523. The PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis. Eventually, the patients discontinued as they progressed in the study. Hence, fewer patients at each cycle and no patients returned on Cycle 1 Day 28 in dose escalation stage: HMPL-523 800 mg QD and dose expansion stage: MZL arms.
Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 1, 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 28 of Cycle 1
Dose Escalation Stage and Dose Expansion Stage: Apparent Systemic Clearance (CL/F) of HMPL-523
Time Frame: Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Day 28 of Cycle 1
Blood samples were collected to determine CL/F of HMPL-523. The PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis. Eventually, the patients discontinued as they progressed in the study. Hence, fewer patients at each cycle and no patients returned on Cycle 1 Day 28 in dose escalation stage: HMPL-523 800 mg QD and dose expansion stage: MZL arms.
Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Day 28 of Cycle 1
Dose Escalation Stage and Dose Expansion Stage: Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of HMPL-523
Time Frame: Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Day 28 of Cycle 1
Blood samples were collected to determine Cmin of HMPL-523. The PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis. Eventually, the patients discontinued as they progressed in the study. Hence, fewer patients at each cycle and no patients returned on Cycle 1 Day 28 in dose escalation stage: HMPL-523 800 mg QD and dose expansion stage: MZL arms.
Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Day 28 of Cycle 1
Dose Escalation Stage and Dose Expansion Stage: Ratio of Metabolite to Parent Maximum Plasma Concentration (MRCmax)
Time Frame: Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Day 28 of Cycle 1
Blood samples were collected to determine MRCmax. The metabolites of HMPL-523 were M1 (HM5023222) and M44 (HM5025866) only. The PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis. Eventually, the patients discontinued as they progressed in the study. Hence, fewer patients at each cycle and no patients returned on Cycle 1 Day 28 in dose expansion stage: MZL arm.
Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Day 28 of Cycle 1
Dose Escalation Stage and Dose Expansion Stage: Ratio of Metabolite to Parent Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During a Dosing Interval (MRAUCtau)
Time Frame: Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Day 28 of Cycle 1
Blood samples were collected to determine MRAUCtau. The metabolites of HMPL-523 were M1 (HM5023222) and M44 (HM5025866) only. The PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis. Eventually, the patients discontinued as they progressed in the study. Hence, fewer patients at each cycle and no patients returned on Cycle 1 Day 28 in dose escalation stage: HMPL-523 800 mg QD and dose expansion stage: MZL arms.
Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Day 28 of Cycle 1
Dose Escalation Stage and Dose Expansion Stage: Accumulation Ratio for Maximum Plasma Concentration (RA[Cmax]) of HMPL-523
Time Frame: Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Day 28 of Cycle 1
Blood samples were collected to determine RA(Cmax) of HMPL-523. The PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis. Eventually, the patients discontinued as they progressed in the study. Hence, fewer patients at each cycle and no patients returned on Cycle 1 Day 28 in dose expansion stage: MZL arm.
Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Day 28 of Cycle 1
Dose Escalation Stage and Dose Expansion Stage: Accumulation Ratio for Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve During a Dosing Interval (RA[AUC]) of HMPL-523
Time Frame: Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Day 28 of Cycle 1
Blood samples were collected to determine RA(AUC) of HMPL-523. The PK parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis. Eventually, the patients discontinued as they progressed in the study. Hence, fewer patients at each cycle and no patients returned on Cycle 1 Day 28 in dose escalation stage: HMPL-523 800 mg QD and dose expansion stage: MZL arms.
Dose escalation: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Days 15 and 28 of Cycle 1; Dose expansion: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose on Day 28 of Cycle 1
Dose Expansion Stage: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Treatment Related Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Interruption, Treatment Reduction and Treatment Discontinuation
Time Frame: From the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, approximately 29 months
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study patient temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs with an onset date on or after the first dose of study treatment and no later than 30 days after the date of last study treatment administration or start of a new treatment of anti-neoplasm therapy, whichever was earlier. Treatment related AEs were the TEAEs that were reported as related to study treatment by the Investigator.
From the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, approximately 29 months
Dose Escalation Stage: Objective Response Rate
Time Frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
ORR: percentage of patients who had BOR with CR, CRi, nPR or PR for CLL patients; CR, VGPR, PR or MR for WM patients; CR or PR for patients with disease type other than CLL and WM. BOR: best response from start of treatment until progression or any further anticancer therapy. CR: absence of S monoclonal IgM, normal S IgM, complete resolution of extramedullary disease, morphologically normal bone marrow aspirate and trephine biopsy. CRi: criteria fulfilled for CR but persistent cytopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia or neutropenia. nPR: patients with residual CLL cells. PR, VGPR, MR: detectable monoclonal IgM, no new signs/symptoms of active disease and PR: >=50% but <90% reduction in S IgM, reduction in extramedullary disease, VGPR: >=90% reduction in S IgM, complete resolution of extramedullary disease, MR: >=25% but <50% reduction in S IgM.
Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
Dose Escalation Stage: Complete Response Rate
Time Frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
CR rate was defined as the percentage of patients who had BOR with CR or CRi for CLL patients, and CR only for other patients. BOR was defined as the best response from start of treatment until progression or any further anticancer therapy. CR was defined as the absence of serum monoclonal IgM, normal serum IgM, complete resolution of extramedullary disease, morphologically normal bone marrow aspirate and trephine biopsy. CRi was defined as the criteria fulfilled for CR but persistent cytopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia or neutropenia.
Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
Dose Escalation Stage: Clinical Benefit Rate
Time Frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
CBR was defined as the percentage of patients who had BOR of SD or better. BOR was defined as the best response from start of treatment until progression or any further anticancer therapy. SD was defined as detectable monoclonal IgM, <25% reduction and <25% increase in serum IgM level, no progression in extramedullary disease, no new signs/symptoms of active disease.
Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
Dose Escalation Stage: Duration of Response
Time Frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
DOR: time from when first response (CR, CRi, PR, nPR, VGPR, PR-L, and MR) was achieved until earlier of first documentation of definitive PD or death from any cause. CR: absence of S monoclonal IgM, normal S IgM, complete resolution of extramedullary disease, morphologically normal bone marrow aspirate and trephine biopsy. CRi: criteria fulfilled for CR but persistent cytopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia or neutropenia. nPR: patients with residual CLL cells. PR-L: patients achieved PR with CLL-related signs/symptoms other than lymphocytosis and continued on therapy. PR, VGPR, MR: detectable monoclonal IgM, no new signs/symptoms of active disease and PR: >=50% but <90% reduction in S IgM, reduction in extramedullary disease, VGPR: >=90% reduction in S IgM, complete resolution of extramedullary disease, MR: >=25% but <50% reduction in S IgM. PD: >=25% increase in S IgM level from lowest nadir and/or progression in clinical features attributable to disease.
Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
Dose Escalation Stage: Time to Response
Time Frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
TTR was defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment to the first occurrence of CR, CRi, PR, nPR, VGPR, PR-L, or MR. CR: absence of S monoclonal IgM, normal S IgM, complete resolution of extramedullary disease, morphologically normal bone marrow aspirate and trephine biopsy. CRi: criteria fulfilled for CR but persistent cytopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia or neutropenia. nPR: patients with residual CLL cells. PR-L: patients achieved PR with CLL-related signs/symptoms other than lymphocytosis and continued on therapy. PR, VGPR, MR: detectable monoclonal IgM, no new signs/symptoms of active disease and PR: >=50% but <90% reduction in S IgM, reduction in extramedullary disease, VGPR: >=90% reduction in S IgM, complete resolution of extramedullary disease, MR: >=25% but <50% reduction in S IgM. Kaplan Meier analysis included only the responders.
Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
Dose Escalation Stage: Progression-Free Survival
Time Frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months
PFS was defined as the time from the date of first study treatment to the earliest date of PD or death due to any reason whichever occurred first. PD was defined as >=25% increase in serum IgM level from lowest nadir and/or progression in clinical features attributable to disease.
Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-7 days) for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks (+/-7 days) thereafter until first progression, initiation of new anticancer therapy or death. Approximately 42 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Michael Shi, MD, Hutchmed

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 26, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 26, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 26, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non Hodgkin Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on HMPL-523

Subscribe