Effectiveness of Positioning on Back Pain After TACE Among Patients With HCC

October 17, 2019 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Effectiveness of Positioning on Back Pain After Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Among Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Changing patients' position in the bed after TACE can decrease the level of back pain without increasing the amount of bleeding and hematoma,bring patients some comfort and relieving abdominal bloating, increase patients' satisfaction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background:During the treatment for the liver cancer patients who are treated by Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE), the embolic agent with chemotherapeutic drugs are injected through a catheter into a femoral artery directly supplying the tumor. Hence, after the procedure, to avoid bleeding and hematoma at the puncture site, the puncture site at groin needs to be pressed by sandbag and the affected limb needs to remain straight. These patients have to lay down on beds and are not allowed to move for at least 4 hours. Due to pressure exerted continuously to the same muscles, may cause back muscle rigidity and spasms, these patients may suffer from back pain and discomfort. In addition to usual pharmacological treatment, nursing intervention aimed at decreasing patient discomfort, therefore, this study will refer to the previous researches to develop the methods and procedures of changing body positions and apply these methods to the liver cancer patients who are treated by TACE.

Purpose:The aim of this study was to compare the level of back pain and on the amount of bleeding and hematoma between those patients changing body positions in bed and those patients not changing body positions after TACE.

Methods: This study was a randomized clinical trial. The sample consisted of 78 patients who had undergone TACE via the femoral artery, patients by using a convenience sampling assigned to either the control or experimental group (each group consisting 39 participants). All patients need to be pressed on the puncture site at groin with a sand bag of 2.5 kg for 2 hours and lie down for 4 hours. The control group received the usual care, remaining supine position in complete bed rest and immobilized. Experimental group patients received position changes in the second hour and the fourth hour after TACE.

Results: The overall trend of back pain is different between the two groups ( p <.001) , the mean of pain intensity in the second ( p =.006) and the forth hour ( p <.001) showed a significant difference. Experimental group patients had significantly less back pain than the control group after TACE . For the within subjects factor of time, the levels of back pain differed significantly across the five-time periods in experimental group ( p < .05) . In the aspect of post embolization syndrome , control group patients had significantly abdominal bloating than the experimental group ( p =.003) . None of patients developed hematoma, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of amount of bleeding. On the whole, experimental group patients had significantly higher satisfaction than the control group ( p =.018).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient with hepatocellular carcinoma hospitalized for TACE .
  2. Age ≧ 18.
  3. Consciousness can be communicated in Mandarin and Taiwanese.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Symptoms of back pain before TACE.
  2. Under the treatment of analagesics within 24 hours before TACE.
  3. Anticoagulant was not discontinued for at least 7 days before TACE.
  4. Inguinal hemorrhage or hematoma during the TACE or before removal of the vascular sheath.
  5. Hemological diseases that are prone to bleeding, i.e. hemophilia and leukemia.
  6. Platelet count lower than 70K or INR (international normalized ratio) is greater than 1.4.
  7. No hemostatic cotton use.
  8. Can not change the position in bed after TACE.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Changing body position in bed
The first hour:Supine position. The second hour:lateral position (right or left). The third hour:Supine position. The fourth hour:lateral position (right or left).
The first hour:Supine position. The second hour:lateral position (right or left). The third hour:Supine position. The fourth hour:lateral position (right or left).
No Intervention: Control group
No changing body position in bed,remaining supine position in complete bed rest and immobilized for four hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The overall trend of back pain
Time Frame: Within 4 hours after TACE
The patients were asked to describe their back pain and rate its severity by using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11).To determine if there is any significant difference the two groups. The NRS-11 with scores of 0 and 10 indicating no pain and excruciating pain, respectively.
Within 4 hours after TACE

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The mean of back pain between two groups
Time Frame: Within 4 hours after TACE
The patients were asked to describe their back pain and rate its severity by using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).To determine if there is any significant difference the two groups.
Within 4 hours after TACE
The mean of back pain in the experimental group
Time Frame: Within 4 hours after TACE
To determine if there is any significant difference across the five-time periods in experimental group.
Within 4 hours after TACE
The mean of back pain in the control group
Time Frame: Within 4 hours after TACE
To determine if there is any significant difference across the five-time periods in control group.
Within 4 hours after TACE
Vascular complication
Time Frame: Femoral puncture sites were assessed every hourly for the following 4 hours by researcher and a nurse.
The hematoma in femoral access site or there is blood on the yarn roll were visually checked, its margin was marked by a marker and its size was measured by using measuring paper. (The area equal to a square that is 1 millimeter on each side).
Femoral puncture sites were assessed every hourly for the following 4 hours by researcher and a nurse.
Post embolization syndrome
Time Frame: Within 4 hours after TACE.
This is a dichotomized variable. Various common symptoms were listed and checked off based on the patient's report.
Within 4 hours after TACE.
Patients' satisfaction
Time Frame: Patient's satisfaction will be evaluated at the 4th hour.
5-Point Likert Scale: with scores of 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1 indicating highly satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, and highly dissatisfied, respectively. Higher scores mean higher satisfaction.
Patient's satisfaction will be evaluated at the 4th hour.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tse-Pin Hsu, M.S.N., National Taiwan University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 21, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 28, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 28, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 201712022RIND

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Cancer

Clinical Trials on Changing body position in bed

Subscribe