Non-restorative Cavity Control in Anterior Cavitated Caries Lesion of Primary Teeth (CEPECO2)

May 9, 2024 updated by: Tamara Kerber Tedesco, Universidade Ibirapuera

Impact of Non-restorative Cavity Control on Proximal Carious Lesions of Anterior Primary Teeth on the Tooth Survival and Patient-centered Outcomes (CEPECO 2) - Study Protocol for a Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Studies have questioned the necessity of restoring cavitated carious lesion on primary teeth, once the control of biofilm is the most important factor to arrest these lesions. This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the survival of teeth treated with a non-restorative cavity control (NRCC) compared to resin composite restorations (RCR) on proximal carious lesion in anterior primary teeth, as well as the impact of these treatments on patient-centered outcomes. Methods: A randomized clinical trial with two parallels arms (1:1) will be conducted. Children between 3 and 6 years old will be selected from the Center of Clinic Research of Pediatric Dentistry of Ibirapuera University (UNIB), a dental trailer (FOUSP) located on Educational Complex Professor Carlos Osmarinho de Lima, the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of Santa Cecília University and from the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of University Center UNINOVAFAPI. One hundred and forty-eight teeth will be randomly distributed in two experimental groups: (1) Selective removal of carious tissue and RCR; or (2) NRCC through cavity enlargement using metallic sandpaper. The primary outcome will be tooth survival after 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The duration and the cost of dental treatments will be considered for the estimation of the cost-effectiveness of the evaluated treatments. The discomfort reported by the participants will be measured after each treatment using the FIS scale. The participants' satisfaction and perception of the parents/legal guardians will be evaluated through questionnaires. For the primary outcome, Kaplan-Meier's survival and Long-Rank test will be used for comparison between the two groups. All the variables will be modeled by Cox regression with shared fragility. Significance will be considered at 5%.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This non-inferiority randomized controlled clinical trial, with two parallel groups with 1:1 allocation ratio, was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Universidade Ibirapuera (UNIB). The other centers involved are considered co-participants (Centro Universitário do Norte - Uninorte , Centro Universitário Uninovafapi - UNINOVAFAPI, and School of Dentistry from the University of Sao Paulo - FOUSP). Children aged 3 to 6 years with at least one proximal cavitated lesion on anterior primary teeth will be selected from the Clinical Pediatric Research Center. Teeth will be randomly allocated to selective removal of carious tissue and resin composite restoration (RCR) or NRCC. Tooth survival after two years of follow-up will be the primary outcome and cost-effectiveness, satisfaction, and discomfort reported by participants and parents/guardians' perception will be the secondary outcomes. Only patients who fulfill the eligibility criteria will be included in the study after the legal guardians sign the informed consent form and the child consents to participate in the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

148

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SP
      • São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04.545-000
        • Tamara Kerber Tedesco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children will be included that have at least one anterior tooth with carious lesion cavitated affecting the proximal surface.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded with special needs, using orthodontics devices and/or systemic diseases which may affect the oral cavity.
  • Also, teeth with lesions affecting more than one third of the buccal/lingual surfaces, with previous history of dental trauma, presenting pulp exposure, spontaneous pain, pathological mobility, presence of abscess or fistula next to the tooth, teeth with restorations, developmental enamel defects or physiological mobility (exfoliation) will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Non-restorative cavity control - NRCC
Enlargement with metallic sandpaper associated with toothbrushing/1000 ppm fluoride toothpaste.
The proximal cavities will be enlarged with metallic sandpaper, exposing the cavity, to allow access for toothbrushing associated with 1000 ppm fluoride toothpaste.
Active Comparator: Resin composite restoration - RCR
Selective carious lesion removal and restoration with resin composite.
In control group, the treatment will be performed after prophylaxis and relative isolation. The selective carious tissue removal will be performed with appropriate dentin curettes. The acid conditioning will be performed only in enamel for 15 s with 37% phosphoric acid gel, and then the application of the adhesive system and restoration of resin composite will be conducted.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tooth survival by clinical assessment
Time Frame: 24 months
Comparing the survival of teeth treated with restoration of resin composite and with NRCC for lesions cavitated in anterior primary teeth by clinical assessment, considering as success when the teeth will be without clinical signs or symptoms of pulp pathology or exfoliated, with no need for more invasive interventions, such as pulpectomy or extraction.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Discomfort regarding the treatment options by a Face image scale (FIS)
Time Frame: Immediately after treatment
Children-reported discomfort regarding the treatment options by a Face image scale (FIS). The scale present 5 different faces since "very happy" (scored as 1) until "very sad" (scored as 5) with the treatment. Higher scores mean a worse discomfort.
Immediately after treatment
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Time Frame: 24 months.
The duration of the treatments (time of treatment) and the cost of the materials used will be considered for the estimation of the cost-efficacy of the treatments by a ratio - cost/effectiveness, being effectiveness considered the tooth survival.
24 months.
Perception of parents / guardians evaluated through questionnaire
Time Frame: Prior to treatment, immediately after and 6 months later.
Parents perception of the treatments will be evaluated through a questionnaire - "Child's and parent's questionnaire about teeth appearance" - with possible answers varying from very satisfied until insatisfied. After the questionnaire is applied for the parents/guardians, the anwsers will bem transformed in scores 1 to 5, in according the original paper that validated the questionnaire. Higher scores mean a worse perception.
Prior to treatment, immediately after and 6 months later.
Satisfaction of children: questionnaire
Time Frame: After 6 months
Children-reported satisfaction regarding the treatment by a questionnaire with five question which for answers will be used a Face image scale (FIS). The scale present 5 different faces since "very happy" (scored as 1) until "very sad" (scored as 5) with the treatment. Lower scores mean a better satisfaction.
After 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Unib3

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will be available on Mendeley database.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries

Clinical Trials on Non-restorative cavity control - NRCC group

Subscribe