Voices of Patients' Relatives to Support Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation (VOICE-WEANING)

January 31, 2023 updated by: Hagen B. Huttner, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School

Voices of Patients' Relatives to Support Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With Severe Brain Injury - VOICE-WEANING, a Randomized Clinical Trial

Patients with severe brain injuries, such as ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage, frequently require mechanical ventilation. Weaning of stroke patients is complicated by impaired consciousness and respiratory drive. Higher rates of weaning failure and delayed extubation (≥ 48h) lead to ventilator associated pneumonia, higher mortality and necessity of tracheostomy.

Therefore, improving the weaning of stroke patients from mechanical ventilation is warranted to prevent ventilator-associated complications and eventually improve clinical outcomes.

This single-center, randomized, clinical trial aims at demonstrating that voices of patients' relatives support weaning from mechanical ventilation and reduce weaning failure in brain-injured patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Methods: Adult ICU-patients with controlled mechanical ventilation ≥48h due to a neurological disease will be included in the intensive care unit. A predefined text - including information on the patient's condition and recurrent request to breath in and out - will be recorded as an audio file by one of the patient's relatives. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the conventional treatment arm or the Voice-Weaning arm. In the conventional arm, audio recordings will be muted by an independent person resulting in a mute recording without audio signals.

When conversion from controlled to assisted mechanical ventilation is intended according to standard treatment, audio recordings will be administered in repeat mode for 10 minutes and performed three times per day. If spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) are intended according to standard treatment, the audio recordings will be played during the SBT three times per day.

Criteria for weaning not to be intended - according to Boles et al. (Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. 2007) and adapted to neurological patients:

Objective measurements:

  • Unstable clinical condition

    • Cardiovascular status (fC≥140/min, systolic BP <90mmHg or >180mmHg, more than minimal vasopressors)
    • Metabolic status (e.g. inacceptable electrolytes)
  • Inadequate oxygenation

    • SaO2 ≤90% on FiO2 >40% or pO2/FiO2 <150mmHg or pO2/FiO2 <120mmHg in case of chronic hypoxemia (Horowitz index)
    • PEEP>8cmH2O
  • Inadequate pulmonary function

    • fR ≥35/min
    • MIP>(-20 -) -25cmH2O
    • VT ≤5ml/kgKG
    • VC ≤10ml/kgKG
    • fR/VT ≥105 breaths/min x l (RSBI)
    • significant respiratory acidosis (pH≤7.25)
  • Unstable neurological condition

    • sedation or inadequate mentation on sedation
    • present or anticipated intracranial mass effect (e.g. midline shift >10mm or progression, basal cistern effacement or oculomotor disturbance, signs of transfalxial/transtentorial/transforaminal herniation
    • elevation of intracranial pressure (>20 cmH2O) and/or obstructive hydrocephalus
    • severe vasospasms (>6 kHz in transcranial Doppler, or determined by CT-A/CT-P)
    • status epilepticus (determined by EEG)
    • acute intracranial infection (without established and/or treated origin)

Clinical assessment:

  • Inadequate cough
  • Excessive tracheobronchial secretion
  • Disease acute phase for which the patient was intubated

Ethics Approval: The Institutional Review Board of the Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg approved of the study on 13 November 2018.

Sample Size Calculation: The sample size is computed with 80% power and a 5% α-risk for the hypothesis of Voice Weaning achieving a 15% absolute weaning failure reduction. The sample size is increased by 10% to correct for dropouts and lost to follow up: a maximum of 354 patients will be included and an interim analysis be performed after inclusion of 50% of the calculated subjects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gießen, Germany
        • University of Gießen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Intubation and controlled mechanical ventilation ≥48h due to a neurological disease
  • Weaning from mechanical ventilation intended by the attending physician
  • Obtained informed consent from the legal representative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years
  • History of psychiatric disease
  • Weaning from mechanical ventilation not intended or decision to limit therapeutic interventions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Conventional arm
Muted audio recordings of the patients relatives.
Muted audio recordings of patients' relatives for 10 minutes x 3 daily from initiation of assisted mechanical ventilation to extubation or ICU discharge.
EXPERIMENTAL: Voice-Weaning arm
Audio recordings of the patients relatives including information on the patient's condition and recurrent request to breath in and out.
Audio recordings of patients' relatives for 10 minutes x 3 daily from initiation of assisted mechanical ventilation to extubation or ICU discharge.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of weaning failure
Time Frame: first 28 days after start of ventilation, or until 48 hours after extubation, or discharge from intensive care, whichever came first
Reintubation and/or resumption of ventilatory support following extubation or death following extubation or failed spontaneous breathing trial
first 28 days after start of ventilation, or until 48 hours after extubation, or discharge from intensive care, whichever came first

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time of controlled ventilation
Time Frame: first 28 days after start of ventilation or discharge from intensive care, whichever came first
first 28 days after start of ventilation or discharge from intensive care, whichever came first
Rate of tracheotomy
Time Frame: first 28 days after start of ventilation or discharge from intensive care, whichever came first
Proportion of patients requiring tracheotomy performed as percutaneous dilatative tracheotomy or surgical tracheotomy
first 28 days after start of ventilation or discharge from intensive care, whichever came first
All cause mortality rate at 90 days
Time Frame: first 90 days after start of ventilation
first 90 days after start of ventilation
Rate of ICU delirium
Time Frame: first 28 days after start of ventilation or discharge from intensive care, whichever came first
Development of delirium according to the Confusion Assessment Method for intensive care unit (CAM-ICU)
first 28 days after start of ventilation or discharge from intensive care, whichever came first

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hagen B. Huttner, MD, PhD, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School, Department of Neurology, Germany
  • Principal Investigator: Joji B. Kuramatsu, MD, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School, Department of Neurology, Germany
  • Principal Investigator: Maximilian I. Sprügel, MD, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School, Department of Neurology, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 31, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Because of local ethics committees restrictions the final decision upon release of the raw data has not been made.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Injuries

Clinical Trials on Sham control

Subscribe