- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03797378
Movement-2-Music: Lakeshore Examination of Activity, Disability, and Exercise Response Study (M2M LEADERS)
The M2M LEADERS Project: Lakeshore Examination of Activity, Disability, and Exercise Response Study (LEADERS)
The purpose of this study is to test the effects of an innovative exercise program referred to as movement-2-music (M2M) on health and fitness outcomes in adults with physical/mobility disabilities. One hundred and eight participants with physical/mobility disabilities will be recruited and randomly enrolled into one of two groups: a) M2M or b) waitlist control. The primary aim of this study is to determine the effects of a 12-week M2M program on health and fitness in participants with physical/mobility disabilities who are in one of three functional mobility groups: 1) Group I - only able to exercise while sitting, 2) Group II - able to exercise sitting and standing with/without support, and 3) Group III - able to exercise one side of the body more than the other side. The second aim is to compare the observed effects of the program in this study to a previous M2M study that groups participants based on disability type. The third aim of this study is to test whether adherence (defined as attendance to the 12-week program) affects the effects of M2M in participants with physical/mobility disabilities. The potential influences of different functional mobility and disabilities of participants on how the program affects participants' health and fitness outcomes will also be tested.
**In response to COVID-19, the 12-week M2M intervention and all assessments have been modified from being delivered in-person at Lakeshore Foundation to being delivered remotely in real-time through videoconferencing technology.**
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The proposed intervention efficacy trial examines a remotely-delivered, rhythmic-based movement-2-music (eM2M) intervention with 108 adults with physical/mobility disabilities who are randomized into one of two groups: a) eM2M or b) waitlist control. The primary aim is to determine the effects of a 12-week eM2M intervention on physical and psychosocial health outcomes in participants with physical/mobility disabilities who are classified into three functional mobility groups: 1) Group I - only able to exercise while sitting, 2) Group II - able to exercise sitting and standing with/without support, and 3) Group III - able to exercise one side of the body more than the other side. The secondary aim is to compare effect sizes of the physical health outcomes including cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength and lower extremity function obtained in the current study to a previous M2M trial that grouped participants based on disability type. The tertiary aim of this study is to explore whether adherence (defined in terms of attendance to the 12-week intervention) moderates effects of eM2M in participants with physical/mobility disabilities. The heterogeneity of treatment effect across the physical health outcomes will also be examined using functional mobility and disability groups as moderators.
Participants will complete a set of assessments at baseline and after the 12-week intervention period remotely through videoconferencing technology. They will also be asked to complete the questionnaire portion of the assessments every 6 months and the entire set of assessments every year for up to 5 years. The assessments include cardiorespiratory fitness measured using a heart rate recovery test, grip strength measured using hand-held dynamometer, lower extremity function measured using the Short Physical Performance Battery and the Timed Up and Go test as well as questionnaires that assess health-related quality of life (NIH PROMIS 10 Global Health Items, NIH PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities), physical activity (Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire), exercise self-efficacy (Exercise Self-efficacy Scale), exercise goal-setting (Exercise Goal-setting Scale), outcome expectation for exercise (Multidimensional Outcomes Expectations for Exercise Scale), social support (Social Provision Scale) and barriers in physical activity (Barriers in Physical Activity Questionnaire). In addition, at the end of the 12-week intervention, participants will be interviewed about their study experience and perceived impact of eM2M on their fitness and health.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35209
- UAB Research Collaborative
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Primary diagnosis of head injury, stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, spina bifida, Parkinson disease, cerebral palsy by a physician
- Able to use upper limbs and/or lower limbs to exercise and follow instructions
- Physician clearance to participate
- Willing to participate in an exercise program three times per week
- Conversant in and reads English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participate in an exercise intervention or a similar intervention in the last 6 months
- Current smoker or recently quit less than 6 months prior
- Cognitive impairment (Folstein's Mini-Mental State Exam score <24)
- Presence of active pressure ulcer
- Any contraindications to exercise based on the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) guidelines
- Visual acuity that prevents following a group exercise class
- Significant hearing impairment impeding ability to hear music to engage in exercise
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: eM2M
Participants in the eM2M arm will participate in an intervention that involves three 60-minute M2M sessions per week for 12 weeks.
All sessions are delivered remotely in real-time through videoconferencing technology.
At the beginning and end of each session, vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation) are obtained from participants.
Participants rate perceived exertion, pain, and fatigue level on a log.
Participants set weekly exercise goals and expectations at first session of each week.
Participants also record daily activities using a provided log.
|
The eM2M intervention involves three 60-minute sessions per week for 12 weeks.
All sessions are delivered remotely in real-time through videoconferencing technology.
The intervention uses combinations of movement patterns that target range of motion, muscle strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, balance, and breathing.
Each session consists of movement routines choreographed to music, and every routine can be adapted to participants' functional ability.
|
|
No Intervention: Waitlist Control
Participants in the waitlist control arm are instructed to maintain their usual activities during the 12-week intervention period and are asked to record their activities on a provided log.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline cardiorespiratory fitness at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
The cardiorespiratory fitness is measured using a heart rate recovery test
|
Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
|
Change from baseline muscle strength at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
Muscle strength is measured with grip strength using a hand-held dynamometer.
|
Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline lower extremity function at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
Lower extremity function is assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
|
Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
|
Change from baseline lower extremity function at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
Lower extremity function will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test.
|
Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
|
Change from baseline health-related quality of life at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
Health-related quality of life is measured using the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 Health Items.
The instrument is a 10-item measure with the response scores ranging from 1 (very severe) to 5 (none).
Two summary scores, a global physical health score and a global mental health score, can be calculated from this scale, with each score ranging from 4 to 20.
Higher scores indicate better health.
The total raw score is translated into a T-score for each participant for analysis.
|
Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
|
Change from baseline social participation at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
Social participation is measured using the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities.
The instrument is a 8-item measure with the response scores ranging from 1 (always) to 5 (never).
The lowest possible total raw score is 8 and the highest possible score is 40.
Higher scores indicate better ability to participate in social roles and activities.
The total raw score is translated into a T-score for each participant for analysis.
|
Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
|
Change from baseline physical activity at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
Physical activity is measured using the Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire.
The questionnaire contains two questions.
The first question asks participants to report weekly frequencies of activities they perform at different intensities.
A total weekly leisure activity is a sum of activity scores calculated by multiplying the weekly frequencies of strenuous, moderate, and light activities by 9, 5, and 3, respectively.
The second question asks participants the frequency of weekly leisure-time activities performed that are long enough to work up a sweat.
|
Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline barriers in physical activity at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
Barriers in physical activity will be assessed using the Barriers in Physical Activity Questionnaire.
The instrument contains 43 items.
Each item is responded with either no (1) or yes (2).
If response is yes, a follow-up response that ranges from 1 (very small) to 5 (very large) is selected.
There are 8 domains, which include personal health, attitudes/beliefs towards physical activity, friends, family, fitness center built environment, policy/programs/staff, community built environment, and safety.
Each domain score is calculated by summing the item responses with its respective item weight.
Higher domain scores indicate greater perceived barriers to physical activity.
|
Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
|
Change from baseline exercise self-efficacy at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
Exercise self-efficacy will be assessed using the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale.
The scale contains 8 items, with response options of each item ranging from 0% (not at all confident) to 100% (highly confident).
All items are summed and a mean score is calculated.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-efficacy.
|
Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
|
Change from baseline exercise goal-setting at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
Exercise goal-setting will be measured using the Exercise Goal-Setting Scale.
The instrument contains 10 items with response options ranging from 1 (does not describe) to 5 (describes completely).
A mean score is calculated.
A higher mean score indicate better goal-setting and self-monitoring for exercise.
|
Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
|
Change from baseline outcome expectations for exercise at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
Outcome expectations for exercise will be assessed using the Multidimensional Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale.
The instrument contains 15 items, with the response options ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Three domains of outcome expectations for exercise are assessed, which include physical outcome expectations (6 items), social outcome expectations (4 items), and self-evaluative outcome expectations (5 items).
Each dimension is scored by summing the item responses.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of outcome expectations for exercise.
|
Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
|
Change from baseline social support at 3 months
Time Frame: Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
Social support will be assessed using the Social Provision Scale.
The instrument contains 24 items, with the response options ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree).
A total score is calculated by summing scores from all items.
A higher score indicates a greater degree of perceived support.
|
Baseline and post 12-week intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Synucleinopathies
- Cerebrovascular Disorders
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Wounds and Injuries
- Autoimmune Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS
- Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
- Demyelinating Diseases
- Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Congenital Abnormalities
- Movement Disorders
- Craniocerebral Trauma
- Trauma, Nervous System
- Brain Damage, Chronic
- Parkinsonian Disorders
- Basal Ganglia Diseases
- Spinal Cord Diseases
- Nervous System Malformations
- Neural Tube Defects
- Brain Injuries
- Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic
- Stroke
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Cerebral Palsy
- Parkinson Disease
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Spinal Dysraphism
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB-300002645
- 90DPGE0005 (Other Grant/Funding Number: National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaRecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, EmbolicUnited States
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke PatientThailand
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | ExoskeletonSouth Korea
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusScuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus...Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke IschemicItaly