Sarcopenia and Risk of Falls in Patients With Major Chronic Diseases

October 30, 2022 updated by: Ta-Sen Wei,MD, Changhua Christian Hospital

Sarcopenia and Risk of Falls in Patients With Major Chronic Diseases - Effects of Therapeutic Exercise and Nutrition Intervention

The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of therapeutic exercise and nutrition intervention for sarcopenia and risk of falls in patients with major chronic diseases. The outcomes will be analyzed regarding muscle strength, quality, and volume, etc., balance and gait, bone density, body composition, fall and quality of life after the intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The main common chronic diseases in the elderly such as stroke, osteoporosis, chronic kidney disease and cancer, have been regarded as the fall high-risk patients. These patients are considered to be at risk for sarcopenia due to decreased exercise, nutritional status, and other reasons. Sarcopenia can be diagnosed and intervened effectively to delay the vicious cycle of health. Past studies have pointed out that in addition to drug intervention, treatment for sarcopenia must be accompanied by appropriate exercise and nutritional intervention (such as protein supplements, vitamin D) in order to achieve the best prevention and treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

186

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Changhua, Taiwan, 500
        • Changhua Christian Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

  • Inclusion Criteria:

    1. 55-85 years old
    2. 3-6 months after onset
    3. walk independently for at least 10m
  • Exclusion Criteria:

    1. lower limb Brunnstrom stage >5
    2. combine other neuropathy diseases
    3. significant deformity of lower limb include: Modified Ashworth scale(MAS) >3; contracture, fracture, chronic joint pain.
    4. joint arthroplasty
    5. unstable vital sign
    6. can not cooperate study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: exercise group
elastic band strengthening exercise
2-3days per week(150min per week)
Other Names:
  • thera-band strengthening exercise
EXPERIMENTAL: exercise combine diet counseling group
elastic band strengthening exercise combined diet counseling.
2-3days per week(150min per week)
Other Names:
  • thera-band strengthening exercise
each patients in this group will receive4-5times diet counseling
Other Names:
  • nutrition counseling

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of walking speed
Time Frame: baseline: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
distance: 6m, patients can walk with foor orthosis and assistive devices
baseline: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of grip force
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Use a grip force meter (kg) to test both hands for test 3 times
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of postural sway displacement
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Use computerized dynography to measure the postural sway displacement (mm)
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of postural sway velocity
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Use computerized dynography to measure the postural sway velocity (mm/s)
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of postural sway area
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Use computerized dynography to measure the postural sway area (mm^2)
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of step time
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Use computerized dynography to measure spatial gait parameter: step time (ms)
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of stance time
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Use computerized dynography to measure spatial gait parameter: stance time (ms)
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of swing time
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Use computerized dynography to measure spatial gait parameter: swing time (ms)
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of single support time
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Use computerized dynography to measure spatial gait parameter: single support time (ms)
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of double support time
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Use computerized dynography to measure spatial gait parameter: double support time (ms)
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of step length
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Use computerized dynography to measure spatial gait parameter: step distance (mm)
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of stance length
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Use computerized dynography to measure spatial gait parameter: stance distance (mm)
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of muscle thickness
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Use ultrasound to assess muscles morphological parameter: thickness (mm). Target muscles include quadriceps, hamstring, anterior tibialis, gastrocnemius.
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of muscle fiber length
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Use ultrasound to assess muscles morphological parameter: fiber length (mm). Target muscles include quadriceps, hamstring, anterior tibialis, gastrocnemius.
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of muscle fiber orientation angle
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Use ultrasound to assess muscles morphological parameter: fiber orientation angle (degrees). Target muscles include quadriceps, hamstring, anterior tibialis, gastrocnemius.
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of muscle cross section area
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention

Use ultrasound to assess muscles morphological parameter: cross-sectional area (mm^2).

Target muscles include quadriceps, hamstring, anterior tibialis, gastrocnemius.

before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of physiological cost index (PCI)
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Heart rate (HR: beats/min) and walking speed (m/s) have been previously shown to be linearly related to oxygen uptake at sub-maximal exercise levels. Combination of these two parameters yields a single value in beats per meter, the physiological cost index (PCI). This is calculated as Working HR - Resting HR (beats/min) / Walking speed (m/s)
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of international Quality of Life Assessment Short Form -36 (SF-36)
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention

including 8 health concepts: (1) physical functioning, (2) role limitations because of physical health problems; (3) bodily pain, (4) social functioning, (5) general mental health (psychological distress and psychological wellbeing), (6) role limitations because of emotional problems, (7) vitality (energy/fatigue), (8) general health perceptions.

Scoring: answers to each question are scored which are then summed and transformed to a 0 - 100 scale.

The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.

before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of amplitude of Muscle activity
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
use electromyography to measure the muscles activity in microvolts (uv) included quadriceps, hamstrings, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius during subject walking in self-selected speed in 6 meters.
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of concentration of CRP (C-Reactive Protein)
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
The concentration of CRP in the blood test. CRP is used mainly as a marker of inflammation.
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of concentration of ALB (Serum albumin)
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
The concentration of ALB in the blood test. Albumin is the most important contributor to the maintenance of plasma colloid oncotic pressure; deficiency results in edema.
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of concentration of Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
The concentration of GFR in the blood test. The glomerular filtration rate is the best test to measure the patient's level of kidney function and determine the stage of kidney disease. It can calculate it from the results of the blood creatinine test.
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of concentration of Hemoglobin (Hb)
Time Frame: Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
The concentration of Hb in the blood test.
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of concentration of Glucose SPOT
Time Frame: Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
The concentration of Glucose SPOT in the blood test. TheSpot glucose measurement in epidermal interstitial fluid appears to be a promising alternative to capillary blood glucose estimation
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of concentration of Cholesterol
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
The concentration of Cholesterol in the blood test.
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of concentration of Triglyceride
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
The concentration of Triglyceride in the blood test.
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of concentration of Transferrin
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
The concentration of Transferrin in the blood test.
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of Berg balance test (BBS)
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention

including 14 items which are scored on a 5 points scale (0-4). The degree of success in achieving each task is given a score of zero (unable) to four (independent), and the final measure is the sum of all of the scores.

The item scores are summed, minimum score =0, maximum score = 56

before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Items are scored on a 3-point ordinal scale (0 = cannot perform; 1 = performs partially; 2 = performs fully) Maximum Score = 226 points The 5 domains assessed include, Motor function (UE maximum score = 66; LE maximum score = 34), Sensory function (maximum score = 24), Balance (maximum score = 14), Joint range of motion (maximum score = 44), Joint pain (maximum score = 44)
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
(body weight) kg/(height) m*(height)m
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of Mini-mental state examination (MMSE)
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention

It is an 11-question measure that tests five areas of cognitive function:

orientation, registration, attention and calculation, recall, and language. The maximum score is 30. A score of 23 or lower is indicative of cognitive impairment.

before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of Modified Ashworth scale (MAS)
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention

measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching, the score is ranged from 0-4 0: No increase in muscle tone

  1. Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM
  2. More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved
  3. Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult
  4. Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
Change of Muscle tone
Time Frame: before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention
measure the muscle tone (kg/m) under muscle resting. Target muscles are quadricep, hamstring, anterior tibialis, gastrocnemius.
before intervention; follow-up: 3 months after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Tasen Wei, Doctor, Changhua Christian Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

only for research

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on elastic band strengthening exercise

3
Subscribe