Multimodal Sexual Dysfunction Intervention In HCT

March 18, 2024 updated by: El-Jawahri, Areej,M.D., Massachusetts General Hospital

Randomized Trial of a Multimodal Sexual Dysfunction Intervention for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Survivors

This research study is evaluating the impact of an intervention to improve sexual function in stem cell transplant survivors on participants' sexual function, quality of life, and mood.

It is expected that about 120 people who have undergone a stem cell transplant will take part in this research study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Frequently survivors of stem cell transplantation report significant problems with their sexual function that impacts their quality of life, mood, and their intimacy and relationship with their partners. These issues can be very distressing to patients and their loved ones. The Investigators want to know if the introduction of an intervention focused on improving sexual function may improve a participant's overall care and quality of life.

The main purpose of this study is to compare two types of care - the study intervention versus enhanced standard care which includes receiving an educational handout about sexual dysfunction. The main goal is to assess if the intervention will improve participant's sexual function, quality of life, and mood.

The intervention includes a comprehensive assessment by a transplant clinician (a transplant physician or nurse practitioner) who is trained in sexual dysfunction assessment to explore the reasons for sexual dysfunction and focus on ways to improve symptoms.

-- If the transplant clinician feels additional help is needed by a sexual health expert, the participant will be referred to the sexual health clinic. In the sexual health clinic, the participant will be evaluated by an expert physician who will also focus on strategies to improve sexual function.

The study will use a series of questionnaires to measure sexual function, quality of life, physical symptoms, and mood. Study questionnaires will be completed in the clinic or remotely with assistance provided as needed.

.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

230

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with hematologic malignancy who underwent autologous or allogeneic HCT ≥ three months prior to study enrollment.
  • Positive screen for sexual dysfunction that is causing distress based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) survivorship guidelines
  • Ability to read and respond to questions in English or to complete questionnaires with assistance from an interpreter.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with relapsed disease requiring treatment
  • Patients with a planned second transplant
  • Patients > 5 years from their HCT
  • Patients with psychiatric or cognitive conditions which the treating clinicians believes prohibits compliance with study procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Enhanced Standard Care
  • Baseline data collection, registration and randomization
  • Inform primary transplant clinician of sexual dysfunction causing distress
  • Receive American Cancer Society sexual educational material
  • Baseline data collection, registration and randomization
  • Inform primary transplant clinician of sexual dysfunction causing distress
  • Receive American Cancer Society sexual educational material
Active Comparator: Multimodal Intervention to Address Sexual Dysfunction
  • Baseline data collection, registration and randomization
  • 3 Monthly visits with trained study nurse practitioners

    • Referral to specialist if
    • Psychological etiology
    • Sexual Trauma
    • Relationship Discord
    • Concern for Malignancy or anatomic scarring requiring surgery

Baseline data collection, registration and randomization

- 3 Monthly visits with trained study nurse practitioners

  • Referral to specialist if
  • Psychological etiology
  • Sexual Trauma
  • Relationship Discord
  • Concern for Malignancy or anatomic scarring requiring surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare Patient Global Satisfaction with Sex
Time Frame: 3 Months
compare patients' global satisfaction with sex using PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measure (global satisfaction domain) at three months between the study groups using linear regression controlling for baseline values (as necessary for any imbalances in baseline variables
3 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare Patient reported interest in sexual activity
Time Frame: 3 Months
PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measure Interest in sexual activity domain)
3 Months
Compare patient-reported orgasm
Time Frame: 3 Months
Compare PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measure - Orgasm domain
3 Months
For males: compare patient-reported erectile function
Time Frame: 3 Months
PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measure - Erectile function domain
3 Months
For females: compare patient-reported vaginal lubrication
Time Frame: 3 Months
compare (PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measure - lubrication domain)
3 Months
For females: compare patient-reported vaginal comfort
Time Frame: 3 months
compare (PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measure - vaginal comfort domain
3 months
Compare Patient Reported Quality of Life
Time Frame: 3 Months
Compare patient-reported QOL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT)
3 Months
Compare Patient Reported Anxiety Symptoms
Time Frame: 3 Months
Compare patient reported anxiety symptoms using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS- anxiety subscale). Subscale ranges from 0-21 with higher score indicating higher anxiety symptoms
3 Months
Compare Patient Reported Depression Symptoms
Time Frame: 3 Months
Compare Patient Reported Depression Symptoms using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS - depression subscale). Subscale ranges from 0-21 with higher score indicating higher depression symptoms
3 Months
Compare Patient global satisfaction with sex longitudinally
Time Frame: up to 6 months
compare PROMIS Sexual function and Satisfaction Measure - global satisfaction with sex domain) longitudinally between study groups
up to 6 months
Compare Patient reported interest in sexual activity longitudinally
Time Frame: up to 6 months
compare PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measure Interest in sexual activity domain) longitudinally between study groups
up to 6 months
Compare patient-reported orgasm longitudinally
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Compare PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measure - Orgasm domain) longitudinally between the study groups
up to 6 months
For males: compare patient-reported erectile function longitudinally
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Compare PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measure - Erectile function domain longitudinally between the two groups
up to 6 months
For females: compare patient-reported vaginal lubrication longitudinally
Time Frame: up to 6 months
compare (PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measure - lubrication domain) longitudinally between the two study groups
up to 6 months
For females: compare patient-reported vaginal comfort longitudinally
Time Frame: up to 6 months
compare (PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measure - vaginal comfort domain) longitudinally between the two study groups
up to 6 months
Compare Patient Reported Quality of Life longitudinally
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Compare patient-reported QOL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) longitudinally between the two groups
up to 6 months
Compare Patient Reported Anxiety Symptoms Longitudinally
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Compare patient reported anxiety symptoms using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS- anxiety subscale) longitudinally between the two study groups. Subscale ranges from 0-21 with higher score indicating higher anxiety symptoms
up to 6 months
Compare Patient Reported Depression Symptoms Longitudinally
Time Frame: up to 6 Months
Compare Patient Reported Depression Symptoms using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS - depression subscale) longitudinally between the two study groups. Subscale ranges from 0-21 with higher score indicating higher depression symptoms
up to 6 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Areej El-Jawhri, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 18-543

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requests may be directed to:MGH - Contact the Partners Innovations team at http://www.partners.org/innovation

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematologic Diseases

Clinical Trials on Enhanced Standard Care

3
Subscribe