Four-arm Mesh for Vaginal Stump Prolapse

January 17, 2019 updated by: Paweł Miotła, Medical University of Lublin

Four-arm Mesh for Vaginal Stump Prolapse: Surgical Technique and Outcomes

To estimate the safety and efficacy of performing modified anterior transvaginal mesh surgery using polypropylene mesh for treatment of advanced urogenital prolapse after hysterectomy (stage III and IV vc Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification [POP-Q] system staging).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pelvic reconstructive procedures were primarily performed using the transvaginal four arm polypropylene mesh, which was inserted through: upper arms- anterior part of obturator foramens, lower arms-ischiorectal fossas and sacrospinal ligaments. All patients underwent hysterectomy in the past apart from one which underwent vaginal hysterectomy during the procedure. Perineoplasty was performed additionally, if indicated. Subjective and objective evaluations included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification [POP-Q] staging, preoperative and 1-year postoperative questionnaires were performed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lublin, Poland, 20-954
        • 2nd Gynecology Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) III and IV vc after hysterectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • malignant diseases
  • unability to understand informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: patients after hysterectomy
modified anterior transvaginal mesh surgery
Pelvic reconstructive procedures were performed with the use of 4-arm mesh:upper arms through- anterior part of obturator foramens, lower arms-ischiorectal fossas and sacrospinal ligaments.
patients fulfilled questionnaire before and 1 year after procedure
patients fulfilled questionnaire before and 1 year after procedure
Pelvic Organ Prolapse staging before and 1 year after the procedure
Postoperative questionnaire assessing quality of life fulfilled by patients 1 year after procedure
patients fulfilled questionnaire before and 1 year after procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) 1 year after procedure
Time Frame: 1 year
assessment of POPQ 1 year after mesh operation, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q) refers to an objective, site-specific system for describing, quantifying, and staging pelvic support in women. It provides a standardized tool for documenting, comparing, and communicating clinical findings with proven interobserver and intraobserver reliability
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sexual function 1 year after procedure
Time Frame: 1 year
assessment of sexual function before and 1 year after the procedure with the use of The Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire
1 year
Urinary incontinence 1 year after procedure
Time Frame: 1 year
assessment of urinary incontinence before and 1 year after the procedure with the use of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI 6) and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ 7) questionnaire
1 year
quality of life 1 year after procedure
Time Frame: 1 year
assessment of quality of life before and 1 year after the procedure with the use of The Short Form Health Survey (SF 36)
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tomasz Rechberger, Professor, 2nd Gynecology Department Medical University in Lublin

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 02/2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Clinical Trials on 4-arm polypropylene mesh surgery

3
Subscribe