Early Weight Bearing Tarsometatarsal Fusion Study

January 29, 2019 updated by: John G. Anderson, MD, Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan, PC

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Early Weight Bearing Versus Non-Weight Bearing Following Modified Lapidus Arthrodesis

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Early Weight Bearing versus Non Weight Bearing Following Modified Lapidus Arthrodesis

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The purpose of this prospective randomized control trial is to assess outcomes in patients who undergo modified Lapidus arthrodesis and whose postoperative management includes early weight bearing on heel (in a boot) and compare it to standard of care non weight bearing post operative management.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

131

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49525
        • Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan, PC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has signed the Institutional Review Board approved informed consent form specific to this study prior to enrollment
  • Failure of conservative treatment (i.e. non-surgical action, consisting of footwear modification in the form of shoes with wide toe boxes, padded inserts, activity modifications and pain control medications)
  • Patients who underwent Lapidus procedure with or without other procedures of the first ray (i.e., muscle-tendon procedures, distal metatarsal osteotomy, Akin procedure)
  • Patient older than 18 years of age
  • Patient is able to give informed consent
  • Patient is independent, ambulatory, and agrees to comply with all postoperative visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has a pre-existing condition which may cause impairment of healing and bone fusion
  • Any significant pathology that, in the opinion of investigator, makes the patient unsuitable for study
  • Patients who underwent Lapidus arthrodesis in conjunction with other procedures that did not focus on the first pedal ray with the exception of harvesting autogenous ipsilateral calcaneal bone graft

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: (EWB) Early Weight Bearing (2 Weeks Post-op)
Subjects in the EWB group were allowed to begin bearing 50 pounds (lbs) through their hindfoot in either the boot or the short leg cast at the two-week visit. They were allowed to advance their weightbearing as tolerated by 25 lbs every four days until full weightbearing through the hindfoot was achieved.
Patient were permitted to progressively weightbear on their heel at 2 week post-op.
Other Names:
  • EWB
No Intervention: (SOC) Standard of Care Weight Bearing (6-8 Weeks Post-op)
Subjects in the SOC group were allowed to heel touch weightbear for balance only on the operative foot until the six to eight week visit. At this visit all subjects were placed into a short leg walking boot. Non-weightbearing patients were permitted to begin the progressive weightbearing protocol, without hindfoot restriction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TMT Fusion Rate
Time Frame: 6 months
To compare the incidence and rate of first TMT fusion using two different postoperative protocols until fusion consolidation.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American Foot & Ankle Society Midfoot Scores (AOFAS)
Time Frame: 12 months
Assessment of clinical/subjective feedback via questionnaires during the postoperative follow up period.] AOFAS Scale: [0 (no function/severe deformity) to 83 (full function/no limitations/deformity)]
12 months
Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA)
Time Frame: 12 months
Assessment of clinical/subjective feedback via questionnaires during the postoperative follow up period. SMFA Scale: 101 items scored 1 to 5 [1( problems/no difficulty/not bothered) - 5 (unable to do task/symptoms constantly/extremely bothered)]
12 months
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 12 months
Assessment of clinical/subjective feedback via questionnaires during the postoperative follow up period. VAS assessment: [0 (no pain) - 10 (worse possible pain)]
12 months
Foot Function Index Revised (FFIr)
Time Frame: 12 months
Assessment of clinical/subjective feedback via questionnaires during the postoperative follow up period. FFIr Scale: 67 items scored 1 to 7 [1(no problems/no difficulty/not bothered) - 6 (unable to do a task/symptoms all the time/worst pain imaginable) - 7 (Not applicable)]. Score range: 46 to 230.
12 months
Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) v.2
Time Frame: 12 months
Assessment of clinical/subjective feedback via questionnaires during the postoperative follow up period. SF-36 v.2 Scale: Self-reporting outcomes assessment [0 (no function/severe physical/mental disability) to 100 (full function, no limitations to mental/physical health)]. Score range: 46 to 230.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 31, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hallux Valgus

Clinical Trials on (EWB) Early Weight Bearing (2 Weeks Post-op)

3
Subscribe