Stress-Induced Inflammation and Reward Processing

February 1, 2019 updated by: Chloe Boyle, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles
Anhedonia, or loss of interest or pleasure, is a key feature of depression and transdiagnostic construct in psychopathology. Both theory and compelling evidence from preclinical models implicates stress-induced inflammation as a key psychobiological pathway to anhedonic behavior; however, this pathway has not been demonstrated in human models. Further, although anhedonia may reflect dysregulation in multiple dimensions of reward, the extent to which stress-induced inflammation alters these dimensions is unclear. The current placebo controlled study used a standardized laboratory stressor task to elicit an inflammatory response in a sample of a healthy young women and evaluate effects of stress-induced inflammation on multiple behavioral indices of reward processing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this study we propose to examine the association between psychosocial stress, the stress-induced inflammatory response, and reward processing in a female undergraduate sample. Specifically, we will 1) examine effects of an acute psychosocial stressor on reward processing; 2) evaluate the association between stress-related changes in inflammation and reward processing; and 3) test key vulnerability factors that may moderate the association between stress and reward. To achieve these goals, this study will recruit 60 female undergraduate students to test effects of stress on reward processing in a 3.5 hour laboratory session. Participants will be randomly assigned to either experience a laboratory stressor or a placebo control, and will complete reward tasks 90 minutes post stress/placebo onset, at which point the peripheral inflammatory response to stress reaches its peak. The reward tasks are computerized behavioral tasks that assess three domains of reward processing: reward-learning, reward motivation, and reward sensitivity. Throughout the session, all participants will complete self-report measures of affect and provide blood and saliva samples for evaluation of the psychological and physiological stress response. Within one week prior to the session, participants will attend a 1 hour visit in which they complete baseline reward tasks and self-report questionnaires assessing mood, personality, early life stress, and health behaviors. In total, participants will complete two visits, with a duration of 4.5 hours. This study builds upon prior studies demonstrating immediate effects of acute stress on reward processing, and further tests for delayed effects of acute stress on reward processing. Furthermore, this will be the first study to examine inflammation as a mechanism linking stress to deficits in reward processing. Findings may inform theory of depression etiology and contribute to more specialized treatment that is targeted at specific symptoms of depression.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

57

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • Clinical and Translational Research Center, University of California, Los Angeles

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 28 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English fluency
  • Age 18-28
  • Biologically female

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current illness
  • Presence or history of major medical conditions
  • Current or past diagnosis of alcohol use disorder
  • Use of tobacco
  • Use of immune-altering medications
  • Current pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stress; Trier Social Stress Task
5 min challenging speech task, 5 min challenging math task; performed in front of evaluators
Standardized acute psychosocial stressor
Active Comparator: Placebo Trier Social Stress Task
5 min speech task, 5 min math task; performed alone
Active control version of the TSST

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Probabilistic Reward Task - Reward Responsiveness
Time Frame: Pre-TSST/P-TSST and 90 min post-TSST/P-TSST
Change in the magnitude of response bias from pre to post Trier Social Stress Task (TSST) or Placebo-TSST (P-TSST).
Pre-TSST/P-TSST and 90 min post-TSST/P-TSST
Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task - Reward Motivation
Time Frame: Pre-TSST/P-TSST and 120 min post-TSST/P-TSST
Change in amount of hard trials chosen from pre to post-TSST/P-TSST (overall, and at 3 levels of probability of potential rewards; low, medium, and high)
Pre-TSST/P-TSST and 120 min post-TSST/P-TSST
Attentional Bias Task
Time Frame: Pre-TSST/P-TSST and 110 min post-TSST/P-TSST
Change in attentional bias from pre to post-TSST/P-TSST
Pre-TSST/P-TSST and 110 min post-TSST/P-TSST

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task - Reward Sensitivity
Time Frame: 120 min post-TSST
Strength of the relationship between changes in reward magnitude and high effort trial choice as a function of degree of change in IL-6 following acute stress
120 min post-TSST
Face Morphing Task
Time Frame: Pre-TSST/P-TSST and 115 min post-TSST/P-TSST
Change in latency to detect emotional expressions
Pre-TSST/P-TSST and 115 min post-TSST/P-TSST

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Change in depressive symptoms from study entry to 4-month follow-up
The 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD) is a self-report measure; participants are asked to rate how often they have experienced depressed feelings, attitudes, and behavioral symptoms during the past week (0 = rarely; 3 = most of the time). The total score range is 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher depressive symptoms.
Change in depressive symptoms from study entry to 4-month follow-up
Affective experience during the experimental session
Time Frame: Entry, pre-TSST/P-TSST; during TSST/P-TSST; 60, 90, 120, 150 min post TSST/P-TSST
Emotional reactivity and recovery from the TSST/P-TSST will be assessed using items from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule and the Profile of Mood States. Participants rate how they feel "right now (that is, at the present moment) on a 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely) Likert scale. Average scores for subscales are reported, including positive and negative affect (7 items each), fatigue (8 items) vigor (5 items) and confusion (7 items). Participants also use visual analogue scales (VAS) to indicate how stressed, anxious, angry, confident, calm, socially connected and happy they are currently feeling on a 0 (not at all) to 100 (extremely) scale. The VAS are completed alongside the PANAS and three additional times during the TSST/P-TSST.
Entry, pre-TSST/P-TSST; during TSST/P-TSST; 60, 90, 120, 150 min post TSST/P-TSST

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julienne E Bower, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 12, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 8, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 9, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SIWB

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress, Psychological

Clinical Trials on Stress; Trier Social Stress Task

Subscribe