- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03857542
A Phase 3 Efficacy Study of Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution (AGN-190584) in Participants With Presbyopia (GEMINI 2)
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-Masked, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of AGN-190584 in Participants With Presbyopia
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Dothan, Alabama, United States, 36301
- Eye Center South
-
-
Arizona
-
Prescott, Arizona, United States, 86301
- M&M Eye Institute
-
Sun City, Arizona, United States, 85351
- Walman Eye Center
-
-
California
-
Azusa, California, United States, 91702
- Milton M. Hom, OD, FAAO
-
Glendale, California, United States, 91204
- Global Research Management
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90067
- Advanced Vision Care
-
Mission Hills, California, United States, 91345
- North Valley Eye Medical Group, Inc.
-
Newport Beach, California, United States, 92663
- Eye Research Foundation
-
-
Colorado
-
Littleton, Colorado, United States, 80120
- Corneal Consultants of Colorado
-
-
Florida
-
Crystal River, Florida, United States, 34429
- Benjamin Knox Lambright, MD
-
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33309
- South Florida Vision Center
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32256
- Bowden Eye Associates
-
Mount Dora, Florida, United States, 32757
- Mid Florida Eye Center
-
Sebring, Florida, United States, 33870
- Newsom Eye & Laser Center
-
-
Georgia
-
Morrow, Georgia, United States, 30260
- Clayton Eye Center
-
-
Illinois
-
Des Plaines, Illinois, United States, 60016
- The Midwest Center for Sight
-
Lake Villa, Illinois, United States, 60046
- Jacksoneye
-
-
Kansas
-
Pittsburg, Kansas, United States, 66762
- Kannarr Eye Care
-
Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States, 66204
- Heart of America Eyecare
-
-
Kentucky
-
Edgewood, Kentucky, United States, 41017
- Cincinnati Eye Institute
-
-
Minnesota
-
Bloomington, Minnesota, United States, 55420
- Chu Laser Eye Institute
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64154
- Moyes Eye Center
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64133
- Silverstein Eye Centers
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63128
- Tekwani Vision Center
-
-
Nevada
-
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89117
- Amel Youssef, OD
-
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89128
- Debry Medical Services PC
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, United States, 18702
- Bucci Laser Vision
-
-
South Carolina
-
Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States, 29464
- Waring Vision Institute
-
-
Tennessee
-
Maryville, Tennessee, United States, 37803
- University Eye Surgeons
-
Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38119
- Total Eye Care, PA
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
- Keystone Research ltd. at Texan Eye
-
El Paso, Texas, United States, 79902
- The Cataract and Glaucoma Center
-
Hurst, Texas, United States, 76054
- Texas Eye & Laser Ctr
-
-
Utah
-
Ogden, Utah, United States, 84403
- Benjamin Travis Dastrup, MD
-
-
Virginia
-
Falls Church, Virginia, United States, 22046
- Vision Consultants and Surgeons
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria
Subjective complaints of poor near vision that impact activities of daily living
Exclusion Criteria
Uncontrolled systemic disease
Any clinical condition or previous surgery that might affect the absorption, distribution, biotransformation, or excretion of AGN-190584. History of cataract surgery, phakic intraocular lens surgery, corneal inlay surgery, radial keratotomy, or any intraocular surgery. However, participants with history of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) meeting inclusion criteria will be allowed to enroll.
Known allergy or sensitivity to the study intervention or its components or other cholinergic agonist medications
Concurrent use of any topical ophthalmic medications, including artificial tears, other than the study intervention during the course of the study
Concurrent use of temporary or permanent punctal plugs or history of punctal cautery in one or both eyes
Current enrollment in an investigational drug or device study or participation in such a study within 30 days of entry into this study
Participation in a blood or plasma donation program within 30 days prior to study intervention administration
Severe dry eye disease (defined as total corneal staining ≥ grade 3 on the 5-point Oxford scale and an ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score of > 33) at the screening visit
Corneal abnormalities (including keratoconus, corneal scar, Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy, guttata, or edema) in either eye that are likely to interfere with visual acuity
Narrow iridocorneal angles (Shaffer grade ≤ 2 or lower on gonioscopy examination), history of angle-closure glaucoma, or previous iridotomy
History of iris trauma, Adie's tonic pupil, abnormal pupil shape in either eye, or anisocoria > 1 mm between pupils under mesopic conditions at the screening visit
Lens opacity in either eye that is determined to cause significant disturbance of the central visual axis on screening biomicroscopy
Diagnosis of any type of glaucoma or ocular hypertension
Bifocal or multifocal spectacles or contact lenses for habitual correction. Participants willing to wear study-provided monofocal correction (either spectacles or contact lenses) during the study can be enrolled
Abnormal and clinically significant results according to the investigator or designee, on physical/ophthalmic examination or medical history
Females who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy during the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle
Participants received one drop of vehicle in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Vehicle, one drop in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Experimental: Pilocarpine HCl Ophthalmic Solution
Participants received one drop of pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25% in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
|
Pilocarpine HCl ophthalmic solution 1.25%, one drop in each eye, once daily, for up to 30 days.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in Mesopic, High-contrast, Binocular DCNVA, Without Losing More Than 5 Letters of Mesopic, High-Contrast, Binocular CDVA With the Same Refractive Correction at Day 30, Hour 3
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)
|
Visual acuity for near (40 centimeter (cm)) and distance (4 meter (m)) targets were measured in mesopic conditions using an eye chart.
High contrast corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was assessed binocularly (in each eye) using the provided visual acuity charts for distance vision in a room with mesopic lighting conditions measured at the target.
Forced choice letter by-letter scoring was used for each test and the total number of correct letters or the highest value (number) of the grid identified (as applicable) were recorded.
Mesopic condition was defined as low lighting 3.2 to 3.5 candelas per square meter (cd/m^2) measured at the target.
DCNVA= distance-corrected near visual acuity.
|
Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in Mesopic, High-contrast, Binocular DCNVA at Day 30, Hour 6
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 6)
|
Visual acuity for near (40 cm) target was measured in mesopic conditions using an eye chart.
Mesopic condition was defined as low lighting 3.2 to 3.5 cd/m^2 measured at the target.
Percentage of participants with 3 lines or more improvement from Baseline in mesopic, high-contrast DCNVA are reported.
|
Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 6)
|
Percentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in Mesopic, High-contrast, Binocular, DCNVA at Day 30, Hour 8
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 8)
|
Visual acuity for near (40 cm) was measured in mesopic conditions using an eye chart.
Mesopic condition was defined as low lighting 3.2 to 3.5 cd/m^2 measured at the target.
Baseline for efficacy was defined as the last non-missing efficacy assessment before the first dose of study intervention.
Percentage of participants with 3 lines or more improvement from Baseline in mesopic, high-contrast DCNVA are reported.
|
Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 8)
|
Change From Baseline in Mesopic, High-contrast, Binocular DCNVA Letters at Day 30, Hour 0.5
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 0.5)
|
Visual acuity for near (40 cm) target was measured in mesopic conditions using an eye chart.
Mesopic condition was defined as lighting 3.2 to 3.5 cd/m^2 measured at the target.
Mixed effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used for the analysis.
|
Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 0.5)
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving 20/40 or Better in Photopic, High-contrast, Binocular DCNVA at Day 30, Hour 1
Time Frame: Day 30 (Hour 1)
|
Visual acuity for near (40 cm) target was measured in photopic conditions using an eye chart.
Photopic condition was defined as high lighting ≥80 cd/m^2 measured at the target.
|
Day 30 (Hour 1)
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Mesopic Near Vision Presbyopia Task-based Questionnaire (NVPTQ) Performance Score at Day 30, Hour 3
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)
|
NVPTQ had 12 questions on 4 reading tasks(reading a paragraph from book, excerpts from a newspaper article, portion of a nutrition label, and a section from restaurant menu).
Participants completed specific reading tasks under mesopic conditions without any near-vision correction and answered 3 questions for each task, rated as 0=I could not read any text due to problems seeing up close,1=poor,2=fair,3=good,4=very good,5=excellent; impact of squinting as 0=No,I did not squint, 1=Yes, squinting helped me read some/all text, 2=Yes,but I still could not read any of the text; and satisfaction as 0=very dissatisfied to 4=very satisfied.
The score based on vision-related ability and impact of squinting=(Book testlet+Newspaper testlet+Menu testlet+Nutrition Label testlet)/(testlets with non-missing responses), total possible score of 0-5.
Higher scores=better outcomes;positive change from Baseline=improved performance (reading ability).
|
Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)
|
Change From Baseline in Photopic, High-contrast, Binocular Distance-corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (DCIVA) Letters at Day 30, Hour 3
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)
|
Visual acuity for intermediate (66 cm) target was measured in photopic conditions using an eye chart.
Photopic condition was defined as high lighting ≥80 cd/m^2 measured at the target.
MMRM was used for the analysis.
|
Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)
|
Percentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in Mesopic, High-contrast, Binocular, DCNVA at Day 30, Hour 10
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 10)
|
Visual acuity for near (40 cm) target was measured in mesopic conditions using an eye chart.
Mesopic condition was defined as low lighting 3.2 to 3.5 cd/m^2measured at the target.
Percentage of participants with 3 lines or more improvement from Baseline in mesopic, high-contrast, binocular DCNVA are reported.
|
Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 10)
|
Change From Baseline in Mesopic, High-contrast, Binocular DCNVA Letters at Day 30, Hour 0.25
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 0.25)
|
Visual acuity for near (40 cm) target was measured in mesopic conditions using an eye chart.
Mesopic condition was defined as low lighting 3.2 to 3.5 cd/m^2 measured at the target.
MMRM was used for the analysis.
|
Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 0.25)
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving 20/40 or Better in Photopic, High-contrast, Binocular, DCNVA at Day 30, Hour 3
Time Frame: Day 30 (Hour 3)
|
Visual acuity for near (40 cm) targets was measured in photopic conditions using an eye chart.
Photopic condition was defined as high lighting ≥80 cd/m^2 measured at the target.
|
Day 30 (Hour 3)
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Mesopic NVPTQ Satisfaction Score at Day 30, Hour 3
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)
|
NVPTQ had 12 questions on 4 reading tasks(reading a paragraph from book, excerpts from a newspaper article, portion of a nutrition label, and a section from restaurant menu).
Participants completed specific reading tasks under mesopic conditions without any near-vision correction and answered 3 questions for each task, related as 0=I could not read any text due to problems seeing up close,1=poor,2=fair,3=good,4=very good,5=excellent; impact of squinting as 0=No, I did not squint, 1=Yes, squinting helped me read some/all text, 2=Yes, but I still could not read any of the text; and satisfaction as 0=very dissatisfied to 4=very satisfied.
NVPTQ Satisfaction Score=(Book testlet+Newspaper testlet+Menu testlet+Nutrition Label testlet)/(testlets with non-missing responses)based on satisfaction items for a total possible score of 0 to 4. Higher scores=better outcomes; a positive change from Baseline indicates higher satisfaction.
|
Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Presbyopia Coping Questionnaire (PICQ) Coping Score at Day 30, Hour 3
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)
|
PICQ=20 questions about impact experienced by participants due to their problems over past 7 days.PICQ Coping domain had 8 items: 1:Normal-sized text,2:Small-sized text,3:Information on a computer,4:Information on a cell phone,5:Increase font size,6:Use glasses to read close,12:Hold reading materials farther out/closer,13:Squint to read.
Each item had response categories:0=never to 4=all the time.
Items 3, 4, 5, and 6 had additional response categories with values of 9/10 to indicate the question is not applicable to participant and were assigned missing values.PICQ Coping Score:(Item 1,2 Testlet+Item 3,4 Testlet+Item 5+Item 6+Item 12+Item 13)/non-missing responses to the 6 components of coping score where Items 1,2 Testlet=(Item1+Item2)/non-missing responses to Items 1,2;Items 3,4 Testlet=(Item3+Item4)/non-missing responses to Items 3, 4. Score ranges:0=to least amount of coping to 4=greatest amount of coping.
Higher scores=poorer outcome; a negative change from Baseline=improvement.
|
Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)
|
Mean Change From Baseline in PICQ Impact Score at Day 30, Hour 3
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)
|
PICQ had 20 questions about impact experienced by participants due to their problems seeing up over past 7 days.
Impact domain of PICQ has 6 items:Item9:Rely on others,Item15:rest eyes,Item16:Feel older,Item17:Feel self-conscious,Item19:Take longer to complete task,Item20:Inconvenient.First 5 impacts items include response ranges from 0=never to 4=all of time.
Item20 ranged from 0=Not at all,to 4=Extremely.
Item9 included an additional response category, labeled with value of 9 to indicate question is not applicable because participant did not have opportunity to experience impact responses are assigned missing values.
PICQ Impacts Score=[(Items 9+15+16&17 Testlet+Item19+Item20)/(nonmissing responses to 5 components of impacts score)] where Items 16&17 Testlet=(Items16+17)/non-missing responses to Items16 and 17.
PICQ Impact score ranged 0-4, 0=least amount of impacts,4=greatest amount of impacts.
Higher scores correspond to poorer outcomes; negative change from Baseline=improvement.
|
Baseline (Day 1) to Day 30 (Hour 3)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Eye Diseases
- Refractive Errors
- Presbyopia
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Cholinergic Agents
- Cholinergic Agonists
- Pharmaceutical Solutions
- Miotics
- Muscarinic Agonists
- Ophthalmic Solutions
- Pilocarpine
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1883-302-013
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Study Protocol
- Clinical Study Report (CSR)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Presbyopia
-
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.CompletedPresbyopia CorrectionUnited Kingdom
-
Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCompletedMyopia and Hyperopia and PresbyopiaUnited States
-
Technolas Perfect Vision GmbHUnknownHyperopic PresbyopiaIreland
-
Lee, Steven, M.D.CompletedMyopia, | Hyperopia, | Astigmatism, | Presbyopia, | Eye Strain,
-
Allotex, Inc.RecruitingPresbyopiaCzechia, Ireland, Turkey, United Kingdom
-
Coopervision, Inc.Centre for Ocular Research & Education, CanadaRecruitingPresbyopiaUnited States, Canada
-
Optall VisionRecruiting
-
Ji Xing Pharmaceuticals (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.LENZ Therapeutics, IncCompleted
-
Allotex, Inc.TerminatedPresbyopiaBelgium, Ireland, United Kingdom
-
Coopervision, Inc.CORECompletedPresbyopiaUnited States, Canada
Clinical Trials on Vehicle
-
Haus BioceuticalsCompletedEczema | Atopic DermatitisIndia
-
PfizerCompleted
-
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.Dow Pharmaceutical SciencesCompleted
-
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.Dow Pharmaceutical SciencesCompleted
-
Instituto Universitario de Oftalmobiología Aplicada...Completed
-
LEO PharmaCompleted
-
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthCompletedObesity | Childhood Obesity | Dietary Habits | Water; Lack of | Feeding Behavior | Mother-Child RelationsUnited States
-
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories LimitedSyneos Health; AccelovanceCompletedHead Lice InfestationUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaUnknownCicatrix | Scar | Keloid | Hypertrophic Scar | Skin Graft Scar | Skin Graft Complications | Donor Site ComplicationCanada
-
Patagonia Pharmaceuticals, LLCCompletedCongenital IchthyosisUnited States