A Narrative Intervention to Decrease Abortion Stigma

A Narrative Intervention to Decrease Individual Level Abortion Stigma: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abortion stigma is pervasive in the United States. It operates across multiple levels, including the individual, community, and structural. While abortion itself does not cause mental health problems, due to stigma, women who undergo abortion are at risk of suffering negative psychological responses including thought suppression and isolation, which can result in psychological distress. Few intervention studies have addressed abortion stigma. Research in other disciplines, in particular mental health, has demonstrated the importance of self-validation in improved coping. Drawing from psychologists' use of writing in cognitive therapy and the discipline of Narrative Medicine's emphasis on narrative as a mechanism of healing, the proposed study attempts to test a novel intervention to reduce individual level abortion stigma. The study will be a randomized controlled trial evaluating a narrative intervention to reduce individual level abortion stigma. The principal research question is: can a narrative intervention that aims to positively frame the abortion experience decrease individual level abortion stigma? An additional research question is: will women who take part in a narrative intervention to reduce abortion stigma have improved psychological responses to the abortion? Women in the intervention group will view a digital story on a tablet intending to provide education and normalization and then respond to a writing prompt aimed at cognitive restructuring. The control group will receive care as usual.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Stigma, Social
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Narrative Intervention

Detailed Description

The proposed study will be a two-arm, non-blinded, 1:1 randomized controlled trial of a narrative intervention to reduce individual level abortion stigma that will be conducted at Planned Parenthood of Illinois (PPIL). The narrative intervention combines exposing patients to a digital narrative and then asking them to respond to a writing prompt, aiming first to normalize the abortion experience and then to help frame it in positive terms. Women randomized to the intervention will view a story created by the research team on a tablet using headphones. The story will be read by an actor and digitally recorded for playback by the participant. The narrative will combine a fictional patient's abortion story with basic medical and social facts regarding abortion. After viewing the narrative, the participant will be asked to write a narrative either on a tablet provided or on paper with the prompt: "Patients have different thoughts and feelings about their experiences when they have this procedure. Tell a story (about yourself or someone else, real or imaginary) that might help another patient feel supported." The goal behind this prompt is to allow the participant to write a narrative that is based in personal experience, but that provides the opportunity to mentally join a "virtual community" through the act of speaking to and helping another (theoretical) patient. Participants randomized to the intervention will complete the intervention during the visit, prior to meeting with an educator. Participants randomized to the control arm will receive regular care in the abortion clinic.

Stigma will be measured at baseline and 2-4 weeks following the intervention with the Individual Level Abortion Stigma Scale (ILAS), a scale that was developed to measure the impact of abortion stigma interventions. Four items from The Profile of Mood States- Short Form (POMS-SF) will be used to assess psychological distress at the abortion visit and again at follow-up. Pre- and post-intervention test scores between groups will be compared in the final analysis.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 215
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Illinois
    • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60610
      • Planned Parenthood

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Women aged 18 or older undergoing medical or surgical abortion at Planned Parenthood of Illinois (PPIL) will be eligible for inclusion. Inclusion criteria include having an intrauterine pregnancy, having a smart phone to be able to follow-up by text message 2-4 weeks after the clinic appointment, having no contraindications to an outpatient medication or surgical abortion that same day, and not meeting any exclusion criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Exclusion criteria will include non-English speaking, no working telephone, and less than 5th grade education level.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Interventional Model: PARALLEL
• Masking: NONE

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention Group; The intervention arm will view a digital story on a tablet created by the research team, then respond to a writing prompt. A baseline abortion stigma and psychological distress survey will be taken at enrollment and then again at follow-up after 2-4 weeks.	Behavioral: Narrative Intervention; Participants in the intervention group will first view a digital story on a tablet with headphones that will combine a fictional patient's abortion story with basic medical and social facts regarding abortion. After viewing the narrative, participants will be asked to write a narrative either on a tablet provided or on paper with the prompt: "Patients have different thoughts and feelings about their experiences when they have this procedure. Tell a story (about yourself or someone else, real or imaginary) that might help another patient feel supported."
NO_INTERVENTION: Control Group; The control group will receive care as usual at the abortion clinic. A baseline abortion stigma and psychological distress survey will be taken at enrollment and then again at follow-up after 2-4 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Individual level abortion stigma	Difference in score on the Individual Level Abortion Stigma Scale (ILAS) between baseline and follow-up: The ILAS is a validated 20-item scale that measures individual level stigma with four subscales including: worries about judgment, isolation, self-judgment, and community condemnation. The ILAS has a maximum score of five; in the study that established validity of this scale, the mean score was 1.35 with a standard deviation of 0.63. A higher score indicates greater stigma and a lower score indicates lesser stigma, so a greater decrease in mean scores between baseline and follow-up seen in the intervention group as compared to the control group would indicate an effect of the narrative intervention.	4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Psychological distress	Difference in score on a modified version of the Profile of Mood States- Short Form (POMS-SF) between baseline and follow-up: Given the length of the POMS-SF, only a few items will be tested. The shortened form is a 37-item questionnaire that asks subjects to rate various adjectives or mood states on a Likert Scale. In this study, the items used will be "sad," "discouraged," "confident," and "satisfied." The scale is scored by adding up the scores associated with negative responses and subtracting the scores associated with positive responses. The maximum score is 4, and the minimum score is zero. A lower score indicates a lower level of psychologic distress. While using only a few items of the POMS-SF has not been specifically validated, we believe that it will provide useful information to evaluate our secondary outcome of psychological distress without placing a significant time burden on participants.	4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Chicago
• Collaborators: Planned Parenthood Federation of America
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Melissa Gilliam, MD, University of Chicago

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Cockrill K, Upadhyay UD, Turan J, Greene Foster D. The stigma of having an abortion: development of a scale and characteristics of women experiencing abortion stigma. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013 Jun;45(2):79-88. doi: 10.1363/4507913. Epub 2013 May 2.
• Shacham S. A shortened version of the Profile of Mood States. J Pers Assess. 1983 Jun;47(3):305-6. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4703_14.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (ACTUAL): June 16, 2019
• Primary Completion (ACTUAL): February 5, 2020
• Study Completion (ACTUAL): February 5, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 4, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 4, 2019
• First Posted (ACTUAL): March 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ACTUAL): April 20, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 17, 2020
• Last Verified: April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: IRB18-1683

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO
• IPD Plan Description: The data from this study will not be shared outside of the researchers involved in this protocol.

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No