Impact of an Intervention with a Narrative Approach in Overusers: a Clinical Trial

August 22, 2024 updated by: Valentin Calvo Rojas, Catalan Institute of Health

Impact of an Intervention with a Narrative Approach in Overusers in Primary Health Care: a Controlled and Randomized Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare an intervention with a narrative therapy-based approach with standard care in overusers in general practice . The main question it aims to answer are:

• An intervention with an approach based on narrative therapy can improve the perception of emotional support, and reduce the probability of suffering from anxiety and/or depression, the number of consultations, and the number of medications in primary care overusers.

Participants will 10 individual sessions carried out over five months. The interval between sessions will be two weeks with a specific duration of fifty minutes per session..

If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare two groups of overusers to see if reduces the number of visits to the primary care doctor.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background: The best treatment for the excessive use of the consultation is currently being discussed.

Hypothesis: An intervention with an approach based on narrative therapy, compared to standard care, leads to reducing psychosocial distress and reducing the number of consultations with the family doctor.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention based on co-constructing a new narrative of symptoms of non-organic origin compared to usual clinical care, with respect to affective social support, the probability of suffering from anxiety and/or depression, and the use of the medical consultation.

Methodology: Pragmatic, controlled and randomized, non-masked clinical trial. Study subjects: 264 users (132 in each group, intervention and control) with excessive use of the consultation (95th percentile of the distribution of appointment-type and/or urgent visits to the medicine service). Intervention will be compared with narrative approach + standard care / standard care.

Determinations: Symptoms of anxiety and depression, social support, number of consultations, age, sex, marital status, educational level, income level, employment status.

Statistical analysis: In order to determine the discriminant capacity of the variables associated with the intervention, we will build a multiple regression model in which we will include those that were statistically significant in the bivariate analysis and those that are relevant according to the bibliography.

Expected results: The results will provide evidence on the effectiveness of said intervention.

Application and Relevance: This type of intervention would most likely reduce the pressure on medical-health professionals.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

264

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Catalonia
      • Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 08029
        • Recruiting
        • Centre d'Atenció Primària Montnegre, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Valentin Calvo_Rojas Phd, Social Worker

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Users in the 95th percentile in the distribution of consultations face-to-face, patient self-initiated consultations with PHC services within the period of 1 year.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Drug abuse or dependence, except for nicotine and tetrahydrocannabinol.
  • Comorbidity with DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) severe mental disorders.
  • Comorbidity with ICD-10 (World Health Organization, 2008) severe cognitive disorders or sensory disabilities.
  • Major locomotor mobility limitations or terminal illness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention with narrative approach + standard care

Intervention with a narrative approach. The objectives will be:

  1. Know significant moments in the personal history of the participant and her family according to her life cycle. as well as structural elements.
  2. Know information regarding symptoms of non-organic origin, pain crises, personal and family resources for their management.
  3. Implement a narrative technique as an alternative for the management of symptoms of non-organic origin, including the following strategies: the participant will be able to tell and retell their story, recognize situations or moments that exacerbate the pain, feel the pain and name it, externalization of the pain. problem, the problem is the problem, absolving oneself from traumatic life experiences, constructing meaning to one's dominant stories through the organization of the experience, to obtain a new meaning of what was experienced through the story, construction of alternative stories.

Health social workers will carry out a intervention with a narrative approach, through its training profile based on transversal skills, which will consist of 10 sessions carried out over five months. The interval between sessions will be of two weeks with a specific duration of fifty minutes per session. This type of intervention, with the objective of reorienting and redefining the demand or the initial problems that motivated the consultation, gives space to the patient's subjective complaint, as well as to locate the understanding of the discomfort and the symbolic meaning of the symptoms.

That is, recognizing the physical symptoms while listening to stories of chaos to legitimize both the user and his symptoms, an encounter that allows return the user to its context without feeling rejected or judged by the health system.

Other Names:
  • Narrative therapy
No Intervention: control with standard care
Participants randomly assigned to the control group will receive usual care from their primary care professionals.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in affective social support at 1 month, 6 months, and 18 months
Time Frame: Before randomization and at the end of treatment at 1 month, six months and 18 months
- Health-related social support: Affective social support: between 5-14 poor social support / between 15 and 25 good social support. Confidential social support: between 6-17 no confidential social support / between 18 and 30 good social support. Total social support: between 11-32 no social support / between 33-55 social support It is a variable that values people's perception, from a person-centered approach to care: For its measurement we will use the DUKE-UNC functional social support scale. This is a questionnaire self-assessment consisting of 11 items that evaluates perceived social support using a five-point Likert scale. This scale provides three indicators: Affective social support with a range between 25 and 5, being the point of cut of 15; Confidential social support with a range between 30 and 6 points, being cut-off point of 18 and total social support with a range between 55 and 11 points, the cut-off point being 33. If the final score is below 33, the considers absence
Before randomization and at the end of treatment at 1 month, six months and 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in probability of having an anxiety or depressive at 1 month, 6 months, and 18 months
Time Frame: Before randomization and at the end of treatment at 1 month, six months and 18 months
Goldberg Anxiety-Depression Scale. This is an 18-item self-report symptom inventory with a yes/no response format (Yes = 1, No = 0). The scores are based on responses to nine anxiety and nine depression items, asking how respondents have felt in the past month. The cut-off points of the Spanish version are ≥4 for anxiety and ≥2 for depression; higher scores are indicative of a high probability of having an anxiety or depressive disorder. This scale orients the diagnosis towards anxiety or depression, or both in mixed cases, and discriminates between the two entities while measuring their respective intensities,
Before randomization and at the end of treatment at 1 month, six months and 18 months
Change from baseline in variables related to drug exposure at 1 month, 6 months, and 18 months
Time Frame: Before randomization and at the end of treatment at 1 month, six months and 18 months
Drug exposure is analyzed through the primary care medical history prescription database. This database contains all medications dispensed by pharmacies. Medicines are classified according to the anatomical-therapeutic classification system: • Number of medications. We classified patients into five categories according to the number of different pharmaceutical specialties that the patient has been prescribed: 0; 1; 2 to 4; 5 to 9; 10 or more. • Prescription of anxiolytic and antidepressant drugs: the following therapeutic groups of interest are identified according to ATC classification: o Anxiolytics and hypnotics: N05BA Benzodiazepine derivatives; N05CD Benzodiazepine derivatives; N05CF Benzodiazepine-related drugs; N05CH Melatonin receptor agonists; N03AE01 Clonazepam (clonazepam is included given its high use as an anxiolytic and hypnotic agent) o Antidepressants: N06AB Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; N06AX Other antidepressants
Before randomization and at the end of treatment at 1 month, six months and 18 months
Number of visits patient self-initiated consultations with PHC services, and totals, per year
Time Frame: Before randomization and at the end of treatment at 1 month, six months and 18 months
They will be extracted from the electronic medical records
Before randomization and at the end of treatment at 1 month, six months and 18 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sociodemographic data
Time Frame: Before randomization
We collected the following variables: Age, gender, civil status, educational level, monthly income, employment status, family life cycle and family structure. Employment status was categorised as being active in the workforce with paid work (employee or employer) or inactive/unemployed. Family life cycle was categorised as Stage I (couples with no children); Stage II (couples with children); Stage III (middle-aged parents: stage begins with empty nest) and Stage IV (aging family members: stage begins with spouses' retirement and ends at their deaths). Family structure was categorised as living alone (without close relatives but may share housing with other relations), nuclear family (including single-parent families) and extended family (enlarged nuclear family, including relatives).
Before randomization
Clinical variables
Time Frame: Before randomization
The following symptoms and functional syndromes of interest are identified, which will be extracted from the record of the list of active problems in the computerized medical history: Musculoskeletal pain; Tiredness/asthenia; Headache/migraine/migraine; Dizziness/vertigo; Sleep disturbance/insomnia/difficulty sleeping; Palpitations/tachycardia; Fibromyalgia; Decreased appetite; Dyspnea/difficulty breathing; Irritable Colon; Abdominal pain; Chronic fatigue; Nausea/vomiting.
Before randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 18, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overuse Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Intervention with a narrative approach.

Subscribe