Pilot Cluster RCT of an Indirect Contact Mental Health Literacy Program for 5th-Grade Students (SMHLP-IC)

December 22, 2025 updated by: Nobuko Demura, Tokyo University

A Cluster-Randomized Pilot Trial of a School-Based Mental Health Literacy Program With and Without an Indirect Contact Component for 5th-Grade Students

This cluster-randomized pilot trial will evaluate the preliminary effects and feasibility of adding an indirect contact component to a school-based mental health literacy (MHL) lesson for 5th-grade students in a public elementary school in Tokyo, Japan. Four 5th-grade classes (approximately 150 students in total) will be randomized by class (two classes per arm). All students will receive a 45-minute lesson that includes an animated video and educational slides. In the intervention arm, teachers will additionally introduce a short story about a well-known soccer player who experienced and recovered from a mental health condition, serving as an indirect contact element. The control arm will receive the standard lesson without this component.

Students will complete questionnaires at baseline (T1), immediately after the lesson (T2), and 2-3 months later (T3). The primary outcome is vignette-based social distance toward a peer with mental health problems. Secondary outcomes include mental health knowledge, help-seeking intentions, perceived need for help, intended sources of help. As a pilot study with only four clusters, the trial is not powered to detect small effects; findings will be used to estimate effect sizes and assess feasibility for a future larger-scale trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study investigates whether incorporating an indirect contact component into an existing school-based mental health literacy (MHL) program enhances reductions in stigma-specifically vignette-based social distance-among elementary school students. Indirect contact is implemented through a teacher-delivered story describing the lived experience and recovery of a well-known soccer player who publicly disclosed his mental illness. This approach aims to promote empathy, reduce negative stereotypes, and strengthen intentions to seek or recommend appropriate help.

The study uses a cluster-randomized parallel-group design, with four 5th-grade classes assigned (2:2) to either the intervention or control condition. Both groups receive a standardized 45-minute MHL lesson including an animated educational video and discussion materials. The intervention arm additionally receives the indirect contact component within the same 45-minute period. The lesson is delivered by classroom teachers.

Assessments occur at three time points:

  • T1 (baseline): before the lesson
  • T2 (post-test): immediately after the lesson
  • T3 (follow-up): 2-3 months after the lesson

The primary outcome is a 5-item social distance scale based on a vignette ("A-san") describing symptoms consistent with depression. Secondary outcomes include:

  • mental health knowledge
  • intentions to support a friend with similar problems
  • perceived need for help
  • personal help-seeking intentions
  • intended help-seeking sources

Because this is a pilot trial, the goals are to evaluate feasibility (recruitment, retention, acceptability, implementation fidelity) and to estimate preliminary effect sizes to inform sample size calculations for a future fully powered cluster randomized trial. After T3 data collection, students in the control arm will be offered an educational supplement that includes the indirect contact story.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Students enrolled in 5th grade at one of the eight participating public elementary schools in Kanazawa, Japan.
  • Aged 10-11 years old.
  • Passive consent obtained from guardians; verbal assent obtained from children.
  • Able to complete self-report questionnaires.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students whose parents/guardians opted out of the study.

Note: Students who were absent on the day of the pre-test (T1) were excluded from the analysis population but not from the initial study cohort.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Indirect Contact
A 45-minute school-based mental health literacy lesson that includes an animated video, educational slides, and an additional indirect contact component. The indirect contact consists of a teacher-delivered story about a well-known soccer player who experienced and recovered from a mental health condition.
A 45-minute school-based mental health literacy lesson including an animated video, educational slides, and an additional indirect contact component in the form of a teacher-delivered story about a well-known soccer player who experienced and recovered from a mental health condition.
Active Comparator: Standard MHL Lesson Only
A 45-minute standard mental health literacy lesson that includes an animated educational video and slides. This lesson does not include the indirect contact story component.
A 45-minute standard mental health literacy lesson including an animated educational video and slides, without the indirect contact story component.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Social Distance Scale Score (Stigma)
Time Frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
A 5-item scale adapted from the Social Distance Scale using a vignette format. Each item rated on a 4-point scale (1=definitely willing to 4=definitely unwilling), total score range 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater stigma. Cronbach's alpha was 0.88.
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mental Health Knowledge Score
Time Frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
An 8-item true/false questionnaire developed based on the SMHLP content. Scores range from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge about mental health and illnesses. Cronbach's alpha was 0.65.
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
Help-Seeking Intention
Time Frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
A vignette-based item asking whether students themselves would seek help if they were experiencing similar mental health difficulties. Responses were on a 4-point scale: "Definitely yes", "Probably yes", "Probably not", and "Definitely not". Students were considered to have the intention to seek help if they responded "Definitely yes".
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
Recognition of the necessity to seek help
Time Frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
A single vignette-based item asking whether students thought the character in the scenario should seek help from others. Responses were on a 4-point scale: "Definitely yes", "Probably yes", "Probably not", and "Definitely not". Students were considered to recognize the necessity to seek help when they responded "Definitely yes".
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
Intention to Help Peers
Time Frame: Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
Students were asked to rate their likelihood of performing various desirable supportive behaviors for a peer in distress. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale. Students were considered to have the intention to help if they selected "Definitely yes" for at least one of the behaviors. An example of a behavior is: "I would ask about or listen to their story to understand their situation in detail."
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Because this study involves minors in a school-based setting and includes sensitive educational and mental health-related information, individual participant data cannot be shared. Disclosure of such data could risk re-identification even after de-identification procedures. In accordance with ethical guidelines and institutional policies, IPD will not be made available.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health Literacy

Clinical Trials on Indirect Contact

Subscribe