A Pilot Study Evaluating Photobiomodulation Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema (AE)

September 6, 2022 updated by: Jaeb Center for Health Research
Randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of photobiomodulation compared with sham on central subfield thickness (CST) in eyes with central-involved DME and good vision.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This study is being conducted to assess the effects of photobiomodulation on CST compared with sham in eyes with central-involved DME and good vision. Photobiomodulation is irradiation by light in the 630-900 nanometer region of the spectrum.

Furthermore, this pilot study is being conducted to determine whether the conduct of a pivotal trial has merit based on an anatomic outcome and provide information on outcome measures needed to design a pivotal trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

135

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Huntington Beach, California, United States, 92647-8693
        • Atlantis Eye Care
      • Oakland, California, United States, 94609-3028
        • East Bay Retina Consultants, Inc
      • Santa Barbara, California, United States, 93103-4223
        • California Retina Consultants
    • Florida
      • Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 33912
        • National Ophthalmic Research Institute
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
        • UF College of Medicine, Dept of Ophthalmology, Jacksonville Health Science Center
    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30909
        • Southeast Retina Center, PC
      • Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30060
        • Marietta Eye Clinic
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46290
        • Raj K. Maturi, MD, PC
    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66211
        • Mid-America Retina Consultants, PA
    • Kentucky
      • Paducah, Kentucky, United States, 42001-7502
        • Paducah Retinal Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21237
        • Elman Retina Group, PA
      • Hagerstown, Maryland, United States, 21740-6597
        • Mid Atlantic Retina Specialists
    • Massachusetts
      • Ayer, Massachusetts, United States, 01432-1191
        • Valley Eye Physicians and Surgeons
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63128
        • The Retina Institute
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28210
        • Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Assoc., PA
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97221
        • Retina Northwest PC
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37909
        • Southeastern Retina Associates, PC
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
        • Retina Research Center
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78705-1169
        • Austin Retina Associates
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Medical College Of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2). Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present:

    1. Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes.
    2. Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes.
    3. Documented diabetes by American Diabetes Association and/or the World Health Organization criteria.
    4. Able and willing to provide informed consent.

Atleast one eye meeting the following criteria:

  1. Best corrected E-ETDRS visual acuity letter score ≥ 79 (i.e., 20/25 or better)
  2. Ophthalmoscopic evidence of central-involved DME, confirmed by CST on spectral domain OCT: Zeiss Cirrus: ≥290µm in women, and ≥305µm in men, Heidelberg Spectralis: ≥305µm in women, and ≥320µm in men
  3. Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and study participant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant.
  • A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status that might preclude completion of follow-up).
  • Initiation of intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) within 4 months prior to randomization or plans to do so in the next 4 months.
  • Participation in an investigational trial that involved treatment within 30 days of randomization with any drug/device that has not received regulatory approval for the indication being studied. Note: study participants cannot participant in another investigational trial that involves treatment with an investigational drug or device while participating in the study.
  • Systolic blood pressure above 180 or diastolic blood pressure above 110. If blood pressure is brought below 180 systolic and 110 diastolic by anti-hypertensive treatment, individual can become eligible.
  • Systemic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) or pro-VEGF treatment within 4 months prior to randomization. These drugs should not be used during the study.
  • For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or intending to become pregnant within the next 8 months. Women who are potential study participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy. Investigator judgment is used to determine when a pregnancy test is needed.
  • Individual is expecting to move out of the area during the 8 months of the study.

A participant will be excluded if the study eye meets any of the following criteria:

  • Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than DME. An eye should not be considered eligible if: (1) the macular edema is considered to be related to ocular surgery such as cataract extraction or (2) clinical exam and/or investigator assessment of OCT suggests that vitreoretinal interface abnormalities (e.g., a taut posterior hyaloid or epiretinal membrane) are contributing to the macular edema.
  • An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, any visual acuity loss would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition).
  • An ocular condition is present (other than DME) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect visual acuity during the course of the study or require intraocular treatment (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.)
  • Cataract is present that, in the opinion of the investigator, may alter visual acuity during the course of the study.
  • History of major ocular surgery (including cataract, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 4 months or major ocular surgery anticipated during the study period.
  • Any history of prior laser or other surgical, intravitreal, or peribulbar treatment for DME or DR (such as panretinal photocoagulation, focal/grid macular photocoagulation, intravitreal or peribulbar corticosteroids, or anti-VEGF) within the prior 12 months. If treatment was given more than 12 months prior, no more than 4 prior intraocular injections. Enrollment will be limited to a maximum of 15 percent of the planned sample size with any history of anti-VEGF treatment and a maximum of 15% with any history of PRP.
  • Anticipated need to treat DME or DR during the study period
  • History of topical steroid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment within 30 days prior to randomization.
  • History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization
  • Any history of vitrectomy.
  • Aphakia
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Photobiomodulation (PBM)
670nm wavelength device twice a day for 90 seconds through 4 months. At the 4-month visit, participants who have not already received alternative treatments for DME will return the original device and receive the alternative treatment group device (i.e. the sham group will receive an active treatment device and the active treatment group will receive a sham device).
670nm wavelength light
Other Names:
  • Photobiomodulation
  • PBM
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Broad spectrum light device twice a day for 90 seconds through 4 months. At the 4-month visit, participants who have not already received alternative treatments for DME will return the original device and receive the alternative treatment group device (i.e. the sham group will receive an active treatment device and the active treatment group will receive a sham device)
Broad spectrum light device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline to 4 Months
Time Frame: Baseline to 4 months

Only eyes that completed the 4-month visit were included in calculation of descriptive statistics of optical coherence tomography (OCT) data. For eyes that received alternate DME treatment prior to 4 months (N=3 [PBM]; N = 1 [placebo]), the last OCT measurements prior to alternative diabetic macular edema (DME) treatment were used in place of the 4-month measurements. All analyses followed the intent-to-treat principle. Multiple imputation (m = 100) was used for missing values of central subfield thickness and retinal volume change, with imputation models that included variables for treatment group, baseline values, and change from baseline at all monthly interim visits up to the primary outcome visit and the randomization stratification factor of recent or planned intravitreous treatment in the non-study eye. Multiple imputation was not performed for center-involved DME given the thresholds are gender and machine specific.

OCT CST change was truncated to the mean ± 3 SD (13 ± 3 × 5

Baseline to 4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change in Retinal Volume on Optical Coherence Tomography From Baseline to 4 Months
Time Frame: Baseline to 4 months
CST = central subfield thickness, OCT = optical coherence tomography, PBM = photobiomodulation
Baseline to 4 months
Number of Eyes With Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema on Optical Coherence Tomography at 4 Months
Time Frame: baseline to 4 months
DME = diabetic macular edema, OCT = optical coherence tomography
baseline to 4 months
Number of Eyes Receiving Alternative Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema
Time Frame: 4 months
4 months
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 4 Months
Time Frame: baseline to 4 months
Visual acuity is measured as a continuous integer letter score from 0 to 100, with higher numbers indicating better visual acuity. A letter score of 85 is approximately 20/20 and a letter score of 70 is approximately 20/40, the legal unrestricted driving limit in most states. A 5-letter change for an individual is approximately equal to a 1-line change on a vision chart. Visual acuity (VA) change truncated to mean ±3 SD (-0.3 ± 3 × 5.3). Eyes that received alternative treatment for DME before primary outcome visit (3 PBM, 1 placebo); last measurements taken before DME treatment was initiated were the pre-specified outcome data. Missing data for eyes that didn't get alternative treatment for DME imputed with multiple imputation.
baseline to 4 months
Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Central Subfield Thickness From 4 to 8 Months
Time Frame: 4 to 8 months

Only eyes that completed the 4-month visit were included in calculation of descriptive statistics of OCT data. For eyes that received alternate DME treatment prior to 4 months (N = 3 [PBM]; N = 1 [placebo]), the last OCT measurements prior to alternative DME treatment were used in place of the 4-month measurements. All analyses followed the intent-to-treat principle. Multiple imputation (m = 100) was used for missing values of central subfield thickness and retinal volume change, with imputation models that included variables for treatment group, baseline values, and change from baseline at all monthly interim visits up to the primary outcome visit and the randomization stratification factor of recent or planned intravitreous treatment in the non-study eye. Multiple imputation was not performed for center-involved DME given the thresholds are gender and machine specific.

OCT CST change was truncated to the mean ± 3 SD (13 ± 3 × 58)

4 to 8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Judy Kim, MD, Medical College of Wisconsin Eye Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 10, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 4, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 13, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DRCR.net Protocol AE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Macular Edema

3
Subscribe