Standardized Patient Encounters to Improve PrEP Counseling for Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Kenya (PrIYA-SP)

October 7, 2022 updated by: Pamela Kohler, University of Washington

Standardized Patient Encounters to Improve Counseling for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Prevention to Adolescent Girls and Young Women (AGYW) in Kenya

The goal of this study is to facilitate uptake of and adherence to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Kenya. The investigators will conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial at 24 health facilities in Kisumu, Kenya of a clinical training intervention using standardized patient actors. The hypothesis is that the training will improve quality of PrEP service delivery, defined as adherence to national guidelines and non-judgmental communication.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Despite global gains in female-controlled HIV prevention strategies, the incidence of HIV in adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) continues to rise. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been shown to reduce the risk of HIV acquisition in trial settings, however real-world effectiveness at scale is limited by poor adherence.

An important barrier to uptake and adherence to HIV prevention services among AGYW is the experience of judgmental, and non-empathetic interactions with health care workers (HCWs). New strategies are needed to improve provider counseling and communication skills to support PrEP adherence among AGYW. Standardized patient actors (SPs) have been used in a variety of settings to improve clinical assessment and care skills, as well as patient outcomes.

The "PrIYA-SP" study aims to improve HCW communication skills and adherence to PrEP guidelines through a cluster randomized trial of a SP actor training intervention. Twenty-four facilities that currently offer PrEP to AGYW in Kisumu County, Kenya will be selected. The first phase will include a cross-sectional assessment by unannounced SPs who will present to clinics portraying AGYW seeking PrEP, according to case scripts. Following the baseline assessment, 12 facilities will be randomized to the SP training intervention. The two-day intervention consists of didactic sessions covering national guidelines and communication skills, values clarification exercises, role playing sessions with SPs, and a group debriefing with HCW participants. Following the intervention, unannounced SPs will repeat the cross-sectional assessment.

The primary outcome is quality of counseling, defined as adherence to national guidelines for PrEP delivery and use of non-judgmental communication skills. An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis will be used to evaluate whether the SP training intervention resulted in higher quality counseling at intervention compared to control facilities, adjusted for relevant baseline characteristics and quality measures. The investigators hypothesize that this SP training intervention will improve quality delivery of PrEP to AGYW compared to standard of care.

Results from this study will directly inform operational guidelines for PrEP delivery to AGYW in low-resource settings and offer a potentially scalable strategy to improve PrEP service delivery and adherence among AGYW.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

232

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nairobi, Kenya
        • Kenyatta National Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Listed by population

Facilities:

  • Facilities located in a county in Western Kenya
  • Currently offering PrEP services to adolescent girls and young women

Health care workers:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Current employee of one of the 24 study sites
  • Able to provide consent

Exclusion Criteria: Listed by population

Facilities:

  • Health facilities where PrEP services are staffed by contract workers, program, or study staff

Health care workers:

  • Study staff seconded to the site as part of a trial or intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Training intervention
In this cluster randomized control trial design, the experimental arm refers to the 12 study sites that are randomly assigned to receive the clinician training intervention. The intervention is a clinician training using standardized patient actors to improve communication and empathy skills of health care workers who deliver PrEP to adolescent girls and young women to prevent HIV.
This intervention is a clinician training using standardized patient actors to improve communication and empathy skills of health care workers delivering PrEP to adolescent girls and young women to prevent HIV in Kenya.
No Intervention: Standard of care control
In this randomized cluster randomized control trial design, the no intervention arm refers to the 12 study sites that are randomly assigned not to receive the clinician training intervention. Instead, these study sites will receive the standard of care, which is no standardized patient actor training, for health care workers who deliver PrEP to adolescent girls and young women to prevent HIV.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of PrEP Counseling Provided by Health Care Workers Delivering PrEP to Adolescent Girls and Young Women for HIV Prevention in Kenya
Time Frame: Unannounced standardized patient actor visits take approximately 15 minutes each, taking place over 3-4 months.
Quality is assessed as total score from a checklist provided by the SPs after each unannounced visit (n=71 SP visits in each arm) including domains of communication skills and adherence to national guidelines. Communication quality is assessed in an adapted version of the Bayer-Fetzer Kalamazoo Consensus Statement; scores range from 7-28 with higher scores indicating higher quality communication. Guideline adherence is assessed in a scoring system adapted from the Kenyan National AIDS & STI Control Programme guidelines; scores range from 0-13 with higher scores indicating higher PrEP competency. Each measure is computed as a percent of total score possible. The total quality score will be a combined continuous score and rescaled out of 100 per unannounced SP visit. Mean scores among all SP encounters taking place in facilities randomized to the clinical intervention will be compared to mean scores among those randomized to standard of care.
Unannounced standardized patient actor visits take approximately 15 minutes each, taking place over 3-4 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Competency Score Measuring Quality of PrEP Counseling Provided by Health Care Workers During Clinical Training Intervention [Among Intervention Arm Only]
Time Frame: Standardized patient actor training interactions take approximately 15 minutes each and will occur during a two-day training intervention. Trainings will be conducted over a period of 2-3 months.
The secondary outcome is PrEP competency among HCWs in interactions with SPs during the clinical training intervention, assessed as sub-scores for interpersonal skills, communication quality, and guideline adherence. Interpersonal skills are assessed using the Interpersonal skills (IPS) assessment tool (Van Zanten 2007); scores range from 1-16 with higher scores indicating better interpersonal skills. Communication quality is assessed in an adapted version of the Bayer-Fetzer Kalamazoo Consensus Statement; scores range from 7-28 with higher scores indicating higher quality communication. Guideline adherence is assessed in a scoring system adapted from the Kenyan National AIDS & STI Control Programme guidelines; scores range from 0-13 with higher scores indicating higher competency. The total competency score will be a combined continuous score (range 8-57) per SP interaction during the clinical training intervention. All scores are rescaled as a percent of total points possible.
Standardized patient actor training interactions take approximately 15 minutes each and will occur during a two-day training intervention. Trainings will be conducted over a period of 2-3 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pamela K Kohler, RN, MPH, PhD, University of Washington

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 2, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The study investigators are prepared to share data with other researchers in accordance with NIH policies and other local regulations.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Summary data may be shared or otherwise made available to interested parties starting 6 months after publication of trial results

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to data will be determined on a case-by-base basis in agreement with the Kenyan Ministry of Health. De-identified data will be made available for secondary analyses. Any data sharing will be performed through secure servers and/or encrypted external drives.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV/AIDS

Clinical Trials on Clinician training intervention

3
Subscribe