- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03881891
Optimizing Acute Post-Operative Dental Pain Management Using New Health Information Technology (AHRQPRO)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
- University of California San Francisco
-
-
Oregon
-
Hillsboro, Oregon, United States, 97124
- Willamette Dental Group & Skourtes Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have undergone periodontal procedures.
- Patients who have undergone endodontic procedures.
- Patients who have undergone oral surgery procedures.
Exclusion Criteria:
- 3rd year pre-doctoral students
- 4th year pre-doctoral students
- dental hygiene students
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Follow-app intervention arm
This arm will comprise of patients who are prompted to complete the PROMIS pain intensity scale through text/Short Message Service(SMS) or email mobile device notifications at pre-defined time intervals on Days 1, 3, 5 and 7 post-operatively.
|
The intervention includes implementation and evaluation of the effectiveness of a mobile phone-based text messaging system (FollowApp.Care) to collect patients' assessments of their post-op symptoms (pain intensity) and to use that data to improve their quality of care (pain experience) in the dental office setting
|
|
No Intervention: Standard care arm
This arm will comprise of patients who receive the usual care.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain intensity in the intervention arm, measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v.1.0 survey instrument
Time Frame: On day 1 post procedure for each patient.
|
Evaluate the pain intensity on Day 1 following completion of the specified dental procedures.
Raw scores for the pain intensity construct are determined by summing each of the individual scores from the three questions for each participant.
The raw scores are then standardized using a T-score, which ranges from 0 to 100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Scores closer to 100 indicate high pain intensities and scores closer to 0 indicate lower pain intensities.
|
On day 1 post procedure for each patient.
|
|
Pain intensity in the intervention arm, measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v.1.0 survey instrument
Time Frame: On day 3 post procedure for each patient.
|
Evaluate the pain intensity on Day 3 following completion of the specified dental procedures.
Raw scores for the pain intensity construct are determined by summing each of the individual scores from the three questions for each participant.
The raw scores are then standardized using a T-score, which ranges from 0 to 100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Scores closer to 100 indicate high pain intensities and scores closer to 0 indicate lower pain intensities.
|
On day 3 post procedure for each patient.
|
|
Pain intensity in the intervention arm, measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v.1.0 survey instrument
Time Frame: On day 5 post procedure for each patient.
|
Evaluate the pain intensity on Day 5 following completion of the specified dental procedures.
Raw scores for the pain intensity construct are determined by summing each of the individual scores from the three questions for each participant.
The raw scores are then standardized using a T-score, which ranges from 0 to 100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Scores closer to 100 indicate high pain intensities and scores closer to 0 indicate lower pain intensities.
|
On day 5 post procedure for each patient.
|
|
Pain intensity in the intervention arm, measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v.1.0 survey instrument
Time Frame: On day 7 post procedure for each patient.
|
Evaluate the pain intensity on Day 7 following completion of the specified dental procedures.
Raw scores for the pain intensity construct are determined by summing each of the individual scores from the three questions for each participant.
The raw scores are then standardized using a T-score, which ranges from 0 to 100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Scores closer to 100 indicate high pain intensities and scores closer to 0 indicate lower pain intensities.
|
On day 7 post procedure for each patient.
|
|
Pain experience in both arms, measured using the American Pain Society, the Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) questionnaire.
Time Frame: The pain experience outcome will be measured 7 days post procedure.
|
Assess patients' 7-day post-op pain experiences.
The dependent variables for our analysis will be derived from the questions: "How often were you in severe pain in the first 7 days?"
A score of zero signifies that the respondent was "never in severe pain" while a score of 100 means the patient was "always in severe pain"; and 2b) "How satisfied you are with the results of your pain treatment following your dental procedure?"
The patient satisfaction outcome scale ranges from 0 to 10 with low scores representing low satisfaction and higher scores representing higher satisfaction.
|
The pain experience outcome will be measured 7 days post procedure.
|
|
Provider Acceptance of FollowApp.Care
Time Frame: 2nd Quarter Year 3
|
The investigators will administer the 26-item Technology Acceptance Model (TAM2) Questionnaire to providers in the intervention group pre- and post-implementation, to assess their perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of FollowApp.Care as predictors of their usage behavior. The control group will also be invited to complete the TAM2 questionnaire post-implementation only, to assess their acceptance of FollowApp.Care if it is made available to them. |
2nd Quarter Year 3
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Unscheduled/emergency visits during the study period;
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 3 years
|
This measure will be compiled on a monthly basis through chart review.
At the patient level, the distribution of emergency/unscheduled follow-up visits (frequency and mean) will be collected.
|
through study completion, an average of 3 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Elsbeth Kalenderian, DDS, PhD, University of California, San Francisco
- Principal Investigator: Muhammad F Walji, PhD, UT Houston
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- A131587
- U18HS026135 (U.S. AHRQ Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | Postoperative Pain After Thoracic SurgeryGreece
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain Management | Postoperative Pain in Orthopaedics
-
Dr. Negrin University HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicSpain
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompleted
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompletedAcute Postoperative Pain | Chronic Postoperative PainTurkey
-
Children's National Research InstituteVentureWellRecruitingPostoperative Pain | Acute Pain | Acute Pain, PostoperativeUnited States
-
University of MalayaActive, not recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain ManagementMalaysia
-
Maimonides Medical CenterCompletedPOSTOPERATIVE PAINUnited States
-
University Hospital, AntwerpUnknown
Clinical Trials on Follow-app intervention arm
-
Gangnam Severance HospitalCompletedSomatic Symptom DisorderSouth Korea
-
Imperial College LondonDnaNudge LtdCompletedPre DiabetesUnited Kingdom
-
Malaria ConsortiumKarolinska Institutet; Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCompleted
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...Brighter BitesCompleted
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompleted
-
Henning BliddalMedical University of Vienna; Eurostars; DAMANRecruiting
-
Ohio State UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedHypothetical Cannabis PurchaseUnited States
-
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineCompleted
-
National Cheng-Kung University HospitalActive, not recruitingWeight Loss | Body Fat Rate Loss | Body Composition ChangeTaiwan
-
Hospital Moinhos de VentoNot yet recruiting