Soft-tissue Quadriceps Autograft ACL-reconstruction in the Skeletally-immature vs. Hamstrings (SQuASH)

March 11, 2024 updated by: McMaster University

Soft-tissue Quadriceps Autograft ACL-reconstruction in the Skeletally-immature vs. Hamstrings (SQuASH): A Multi-Centre Randomized Controlled Trial

To date, the use of the quadriceps tendon as an autograft option in primary paediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction has not been well studied. The 2018 International Olympic Committee (IOC) Consensus Statement now outlines the quadriceps tendon as a possible autograft option. However, no Randomised Control Trial (RCT) has examined the efficacy of the quadriceps tendon autograft in primary paediatric ACL reconstruction compared to the historical "gold-standard" soft-tissue hamstring autograft in this population. In light of its evidence for favourable outcomes in the adult population, and the (albeit limited) evidence showing safety and promise in the paediatric population, clinical equipoise exists for assessing its impact on outcomes in paediatric patients at the index surgery. This trial aims to demonstrate feasibility of a global RCT that will evaluate the efficacy of soft-tissue quadriceps versus hamstring autograft tendons on re-operation, return to sport, and knee function among paediatric patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N3Z5
        • Recruiting
        • McMaster University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Darren De Sa, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Olufemi R Ayeni, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Devin C Peterson, MD
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5W9
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Children's Hospital of Western Ontario
        • Contact:
          • Debra Bartley, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Debra Bartley, MD
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L1
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sasha Carsen, MD
        • Contact:
          • Sasha Carsen, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males and females aged 10-18 years.
  2. History, physical exam, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or arthroscopic image confirmation of ACL insufficiency.
  3. Suitable for anatomic, single-bundle arthroscopic-assisted ACL reconstruction.
  4. Complete or partial transphyseal ACL femoral and tibial tunnel drilling/reconstruction techniques.
  5. Patient involved in sport (competitive and/or recreational level) prior to injury.
  6. Patient and parent/guardian speak, read, and understand the language of the clinical site.
  7. Patient and parent/guardian provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Evidence (i.e. radiographic and/or arthroscopic) of International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Cartilage Lesion Classification System Grade 2 and higher osteoarthritis.
  2. Tibial eminemence/spine fractures.
  3. Concomitant collateral, posterior cruciate, and/or cartilage pathology.
  4. Previous knee surgery in the affected or contra-lateral knee.
  5. Previous distal femur and/or proximal tibial/fibular physeal injury in the affected or contra-lateral knee.
  6. Allograft or allograft-augmentation of the ACL reconstruction.
  7. ACL reconstruction utilizing synthetic grafts.
  8. Primary ACL repair.
  9. Generalized ligamentous laxity and/or hypermobility (i.e. Beighton Criteria ≥ 4/9), given statistically significant higher failure rates (24% vs. 7.7%) and inferior subjective outcomes in this population.
  10. Significant medical co-morbidities (requiring daily assistance for activities of daily living).
  11. Patient, parent/guardian, and/or clinical investigator believe the patient will have difficulty maintaining follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Soft-tissue hamstring
All patients in the study will undergo arthroscopic-assisted, single-bundle, complete transphyseal, anatomic primary ACL reconstruction at the discretion of the surgeon, considering the individual patient's age, physeal status, and anticipated years of growth remaining to skeletal maturity. Patients in this arm will undergo soft-tissue autograft reconstruction using hamstrings (i.e. semitendinosus and/or gracilis) grafts. Grafts will be secured on the femur and tibia according to surgeon preference, given literature demonstrating no clear superior method for graft fixation.
Patients will be prescribed to receive a soft tissue hamstring autograft to for ACL reconstruction.
Active Comparator: Quadriceps tendon
Patients in this arm will undergo soft-tissue autograft reconstruction using all-soft-tissue quadriceps (i.e. full or partial thickness) grafts. Grafts will be secured on the femur and tibia according to surgeon preference, given literature demonstrating no clear superior method for graft fixation.
Patients will be prescribed to receive a quadriceps tendon autograft to for ACL reconstruction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of reoperation
Time Frame: 2 years
Re-operation is defined as a composite of: failure (defined by one or more of: revision ACL surgery, MRI confirmation of re-rupture, Lachman 2+ and/or instrumented laxity measurement greater than 5 mm side-to-side difference), and non-failure indications (such as: meniscal tears requiring repair or menisectomy; osteochondral defects; symptomatic loose bodies; arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia and/or arthroscopic/open lysis of adhesions; removal of hardware; deep infection; and/or arthroscopic/open lavage without infection).
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Return to Sport
Time Frame: 2 years
Return to sport (at any level and to pre-injury level) will be evaluated using the Tegner Activity Scale. The Tegner activity level scale is a graduated list of activities of daily living, recreation, and competitive sports, in which the response is presented as an 11-point Likert scale, where 0 indicates the lowest level of ability to perform work and sport functions, and 10 indicates competitive participation in high level sports.
2 years
Patient Reported Knee Function
Time Frame: 2 years
Patient Knee Function will be evaluated using the Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Form (Pedi-IKDC). The Pedi-IKDC is a 15 question form that consists of measures of daily living and sport activity, in which the response options are presented as either 4 or 10 point Likert scales. Scores for the form range from 0 (lowest level of function) to 100 (highest level of function).
2 years
Range of Motion
Time Frame: 2 years
Knee range of motion and both anterior and posterior and rotational stability will be evaluated.
2 years
Incidence of distal femoral and/or proximal tibial/fibular physeal injury
Time Frame: 2 years
Incidence of these injuries will be confirmed through standing hip-to-ankle plain radiographs
2 years
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Integrity
Time Frame: 2 years
The Lachman test will be used to evaluate single and sagittal plane instability to determine integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament.
2 years
Anterolateral Rotary Instability of the Knee
Time Frame: 2 years
The pivot shift test will be used to detect anterolateral rotary instability of the knee
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Darren de SA, MD, FRCSC, McMaster University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SQuASH

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Clinical Trials on Soft tissue hamstring autograft

3
Subscribe