Bone Height and Extractions Study

October 28, 2019 updated by: King's College London

A Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess the Alveolar Bone Height Distal to Lower Second Molar Following Either Coronectomy or Extraction of the Adjacent Impacted Lower Third Molar

A coronectomy is often chosen over complete extraction of a lower third molar when the tooth appears to be in close proximity to the inferior dental (ID) canal, as assessed on a plain radiograph or a cone beam computer tomograph (CBCT). Following a coronectomy, the roots of the third molar may migrate in a coronal direction. This effect, along with the bone-preserving technique of a coronectomy over extraction, may provide increased bone height distal to the lower second molars, when compared to extraction. Partially erupted lower third molars, specifically those with mesio-angular impactions, are commonly associated with reduced bone height distal to lower second molars, and cause damage to the periodontal support of these neighboring teeth. It is assumed that maintenance of the impacted third molars or extraction of these teeth may compromise the periodontal status of the lower second molars. This study will investigate if coronectomy improves the bone levels, and therefore the periodontal status, of lower second molars, and may propose an indication for a coronectomy regardless of the proximity of the tooth to the ID canal.

Coronectomies were first proposed as a treatment option just over thirty years ago, but there are very few long-term studies on the procedure reported in the literature. To the best of the investigator's knowledge, this will be the first randomised controlled trial comparing the bone height distal to the lower second molar following a coronectomy or extraction of the lower third molar.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring extraction of both lower third molars
  • Both lower third molars to have mesio-angular impa
  • ctions, as assessed by location of the contact point between the crown of the third molar and the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) of the second molar and the angulation of the third molar
  • Both lower third molars must lie above or clear of the ID canal as assessed on a plain radiograph or CBCT
  • Presence of lower second molars
  • Patients must be ≥18yrs old
  • Patients willing to attend follow up appointments

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lower third molars with caries, periapical pathology or associated lesions such as cysts
  • Patients who are immunocompromised, have a history of or due to have head and neck radiotherapy, chemotherapy, have previously been given or due to start intravenous bisphosphonates
  • Smokers (>5 cigarettes/day)
  • Patients involved in current research or have recently been involved with research prior to recruitment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Third molar surgery
Split mouth comparison of effect of complete third molar removal vs coronectomy of contralateral third molar
Comparing complete removal of third molar with removal of crown only on contralateral side

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Linear bone height distal to lower second molar tooth
Time Frame: Six months surgical intervention
Assessed by comparison of periapical radiographs pre- and post-intervention
Six months surgical intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alveolar Bone Loss

Clinical Trials on Third molar surgery

3
Subscribe