Computer-Delivered PFI for Anxiety Sensitivity/Alcohol Intervention for Hazardous Drinkers With Elevated Anxiety Sensitivity

February 21, 2020 updated by: Daniel Paulus, University of Houston

Computer-Delivered Personalized Feedback Intervention for Hazardous Drinkers With Elevated Anxiety Sensitivity

Hazardous alcohol consumption is one of the leading causes of preventable deaths in the United States. Further, it is highly comorbid with anxiety and depressive symptoms and disorders; hazardous alcohol use is associated with increased anxiety/depression. Indeed, 'affectively-vulnerable hazardous drinkers' (i.e., drinkers with elevated negative mood states or psychopathology) are 'at risk' for higher drinking rates, more problematic drinking, worsened mental health, and greater disability. Specialty care options are needed to address the unique 'affective needs' of hazardous drinkers. One promising intervention approach is to employ personalized feedback interventions (PFI). These interventions are brief, efficient, and have been shown to be effective in a number of settings and across an array of populations. However, PFIs have not been evaluated among affectively vulnerable hazardous drinkers.

In order to address the heterogeneity of negative mood states and disorders among hazardous drinkers, there is a need to theoretically orient the intervention approach on underlying transdiagnostic processes that underpin affective psychopathology. Anxiety sensitivity (AS), the tendency to fear anxiety-related sensations, is a core transdiagnostic vulnerability factor underlying the etiology and maintenance of anxiety disorders, other emotional disorders, and hazardous drinking. AS is malleable in response to psychosocial interventions, making it a prime risk factor to target in prevention/intervention programs, including PFI approaches. Integrated treatments that address hazardous drinking via AS are nonexistant. As most hazardous drinkers typically do not access treatment because of such barriers as cost, time commitments, stigma, and logistics (e.g., travel, scheduling appointments), there is a need to develop an accessible, brief, integrated tool to explicitly address the drinking-affective vulnerability comorbidity via AS. To address this public health gap, the current proposal seeks to employ a computer-delivered integrated PFI that directly addresses hazardous drinking-AS in a personalized manner. Hazardous drinkers with elevated AS will be randomly assigned to receive one session of PFI or attention information control with follow-up assessments at one week and one month post-intervention. The PFI will focus on targeted feedback about drinking behaviors, AS, and adaptive coping strategies.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States
        • University of Houston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • elevated anxiety sensitivity, hazardous drinking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current mental health/substance treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Experimental: PFI
The novel integrated PFI will be developed and modeled from past PFIs targeting hazardous drinking. Participants will view feedback on the computer screen. The computer program/algorithm will determine the proper normative feedback to participants.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motivation for change
Time Frame: 1 month
The Alcohol Ladder (Clair et al., 2011). The Alcohol Ladder is a reliable and valid (Hogue, Dauber, & Morgenstern, 2010) measure of motivation to change alcohol use. It contains 10 statements that correspond to stages of change: pre-contemplation (e.g., "I enjoy drinking and have decided I'll never change it. I have no interest in changing the way I drink"), contemplation (e.g., "I rarely think about changing the way I drink, and I have no plans to change it"), preparation (e.g., "I definitely plan to change my alcohol use, and I'm almost ready to make some plans about how to change"), action (e.g., "I have changed my drinking, but I still worry about slipping back. So I need to keep working on the changes I've made), and maintenance (e.g., "I have changed my drinking and will never go back to the way I drank before). Participants select the statement that best corresponds to their current stage of motivation regarding changes in their alcohol use.
1 month
Drinks per occasion
Time Frame: 1 month
Drinks per occasion will be assessed as a ratio of the number of drinks consumed in the past 30 days over the number of drinking occasions reported over the past 30 days.
1 month
Anxiety Sensitivity
Time Frame: 1 month
Anxiety Sensitivity sensitivity will be assessed with the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3; Taylor et al., 2007). The ASI-3 is an 18-item self-report measure of anxiety sensitivity. Items (e.g., "It scares me when my heart beats rapidly") are rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 0 (very little) to 4 (very much). Items are summed to a total score. The ASI-3 shows good convergent and discriminant validity (Taylor et al., 2007).
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Drinking to cope
Time Frame: 1 month
Drinking to cope will be measured with the Drinking motives questionnaire-revised (DMQ-R; Cooper, 1994). The DMQ-R is a 20-item self-report measure of drinking motives. It contains four subscales: social, enhancement, social pressure/conformity, and coping with anxiety/depression. The coping subscale (e.g., "to forget your worries") will serve as the measure of drinking to cope with emotional symptoms.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00001045

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Drinking

Clinical Trials on Personalized feedback intervention

Subscribe