Comparision of Non Surgical Retreatment and Endodontic Surgery of Failed Root Canal Treated Teeth

Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Outcome of Nonsurgical Retreatment and Endodontic Surgery of Root Filled Teeth"

To the best of our knowledge, only two studies are available which have provided a direct comparison between outcome of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery. The results of the two studies are contradictory in nature. Two systematic reviews conducted to explore the issue also could not draw any definitive conclusions and suggested that further research is necessary to find out effects of surgical versus nonsurgical approach. Considering the very limited amount of data on this pertinent topic, there is apparent need of high quality randomized controlled studies to further investigate the difference in outcome between nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

TITLE: Comparative evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcome of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery of root filled teeth.

RATIONALE: To the best of our knowledge, only two studies are available which have provided a direct comparison between outcome of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery. The results of the two studies are contradictory in nature. Two systematic reviews conducted to explore the issue also could not draw any definitive conclusions and suggested that further research is necessary to find out effects of surgical versus nonsurgical approach. Considering the very limited amount of data on this pertinent topic, there is apparent need of high quality randomized controlled studies to further investigate the difference in outcome between nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES: Evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of nonsurgical endodontic retreatment and endodontic surgery.

SETTING: Study subjects should be recruited from the Post Graduate Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, PGIDS, Rohtak, Haryana.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized study

Method: Patients with above inclusion criteria will be selected and randomly allocated to one of the two study groups ( nonsurgical retreatment , endodontic microsurgery ). Root canal retreatment will be performed according to standard protocol. Surgical procedures will be carried out under operating microscope with 8 × 16 magnification by following standardized treatment methods.

Outcome measures: Follow up will be done every 3 months till 12 month period to assess clinical and radiographic success of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic microsurgery. Clinical success will be assessed by absence of pain and tenderness to palpation/ percussion, absence of sinus or any associated soft tissue swelling, tooth mobility of grade-I or less, and no deterioration in periodontal probing depth. Radiographic success will be assessed by the criteria followed by Rud et al. (1972) and Molven et al. (1987). Intensity of pain will be assessed using Visual Analog Scale. Pain intensity will be recorded at different intervals (preoperatively, after 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 1day, 2 days, 3 days, 4 days, 5 days, 6 days and 7 days). Intake of analgesic will also be recorded.

Statistical Analysis: The data gathered will be analyzed using suitable statistical methods.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

86

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Haryana
      • Rohtak, Haryana, India, 124001
        • Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Patient willingness to participate in the study.

    • Previously root filled Permanent teeth with post-treatment apical periodontitis requiring treatment.
    • Radiographic evidence of periapical radiolucency (minimum size ≥ 2.0 × 2.0 mm2).
    • Failure of previous root canal treatment will be determined based on clinical and radiographic examinations.
    • Patient's age more than 18 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Positive history of antibiotic use within past three months of the treatment.
  • Positive history of analgesic use within the past 7 days.
  • Procedural errors in previous root canal treatment which are not manageable.
  • Patients who are pregnant, diabetic, having human immunodeficiency virus infection or other immunocompromising conditions, had serious medical illness or requiring antibiotic premedication.
  • Patients with unrestorable lesions, fractures involving the periodontium, and/or periodontal pockets ≥ 4mm deep or having marginal or furcal bone loss due to periodontitis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: surgical treatment
surgical treatment of failed root canal treated teeth following secondary root canal treatment.
surgical treatment will be done of failed root canal treated teeth
Experimental: Non surgical retreatment
Non surgical retreatment of failed root canal treated teeth
Non surgical retreatment will be done.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic success
Time Frame: Baseline to one year

Follow up will be done every 3 months till 12 months. scoring of each tooth will be done according to criteria followed by Rud et al (1972) and Molven et al (1987)

  1. Complete healing, defined by re-establishment of the lamina dura
  2. Incomplete healing (scar tissue)
  3. Uncertain healing
  4. Unsatisfactory healing (failure)
Baseline to one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periapical Periodontitis

Clinical Trials on surgical treatment

3
Subscribe