Psychological Response and Readiness Associated With OCD of the Knee

January 17, 2024 updated by: Matthew Milewski, Boston Children's Hospital

Psychological Response and Readiness to Return to Sports Associated With the Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee

This study primarily aims to determine whether patients diagnosed with osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee experience psychological stress due to their diagnosis and treatment plan. Secondarily, this study aims to determine whether knee OCD patients experience a change in stress and depression as they progress through their standard-of-care treatment plan, and whether they have impaired psychological readiness for return to sport.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Young athletes with poor psychological responses to injury and recovery may be at risk for suboptimal rehabilitation and return to sports. The issues of psychological readiness and fear/anxiety of reinjury are well documented in the treatment of ACL injuries in young athletes. To the investigative team's knowledge, no studies have examined the psychological response and psychological readiness to return to sports in pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing treatment for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee.

OCD is a focal, idiopathic alteration of subchondral bone with risk for instability and disruption of adjacent articular cartilage that may result in premature osteoarthritis. It generally affects a young population between 6 and 19 years of age, with highest prevalence between the ages of 12 and 19 years of age. This condition can be treated both conservatively and surgically depending on the age of the patient, size of the lesion, severity and instability of the bone & cartilage, and previous treatment. The unclear etiology of this condition, the delayed / prolonged pre-diagnosis symptoms, varied treatment options, and unpredictable healing timelines are all factors that families and patients find frustrating about this condition. The investigators of this study believe that this leads to higher than normal psychological stress at the time of diagnosis and throughout treatment of this condition.

Improved understanding of the psychological stress and readiness to return to sport in the treatment of knee OCD can help patients, their families, and clinicians alike. Awareness can help clinicians provide the appropriate outreach and counseling for patients at risk for increased psychological stress. Improved psychological states and readiness can improve both physical and mental well-being.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Recruiting
        • Boston Children's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Matthew D Milewski, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Melissa A Christino, MD
    • Texas
      • Frisco, Texas, United States, 75034
        • Recruiting
        • Texas Scottish Rite Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Henry B Ellis, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Philip L Wilson, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 19 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who meet eligibility criteria presenting to either 1) Boston Children's Sports Medicine and seen by Dr. Matthew Milewski, MD, or Dr. Melissa Christino, MD, with a new diagnosis of an OCD lesion of the knee; or 2) Texas Scottish Rite Hospital's Sports Medicine Clinic and seen by Dr. Henry Ellis, MD, or Dr. Philip Wilson, MD.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between the ages 11-19
  • Diagnosis of knee OCD confirmed by X-ray or MRI

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Had previous surgical treatment for their knee OCD lesion
  • Received knee OCD non-operative treatment on the ipsilateral side for >6 months and taken out of sports/physical activities
  • Guardian not comfortable with child completing survey
  • Is not fluent in English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Surgical Treatment
Patient's in this cohort will undergo surgical treatment for OCD of the knee.
Surgical standard-of-care treatment for knee OCD
Nonoperative Treatment
Patient's in this cohort will undergo nonoperative treatment for OCD of the knee.
Nonoperative standard-of-care treatment for knee OCD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
THE CHILDREN'S IMPACT OF EVENT SCALE (CRIES-13) score
Time Frame: Time of surgical consultation/diagnosis for knee OCD

A CRIES-13 score is a continuous number between 0 and 65 (the higher the score, the more severe the outcome). CRIES items will be keyed to the diagnosis and treatment of OCD (i.e., the patient is asked to indicate how frequently each comment was true for them during the past 7 days with respect to their experience with OCD).

The CRIES is a 13-item, 4-point scale assessing psychological distress. It has three subscales: intrusion, avoidance, and arousal. It is based off the Impact of Event Scale (IES) and is designed to address misinterpretation of items by children on the IES. It is designed for children 8 years of age and above to read independently. If the score is greater than or equal to 30, the score is indicative of increased subjective stress.

Time of surgical consultation/diagnosis for knee OCD

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
THE CHILDREN'S IMPACT OF EVENT SCALE (CRIES-13) score
Time Frame: Scores taken repeatedly overtime between diagnosis and follow-up (at every clinic visit as well as 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and 2 years post diagnosis)

A CRIES-13 score is a continuous number between 0 and 65 (the higher the score, the more severe the outcome). CRIES items will be keyed to the diagnosis and treatment of OCD (i.e., the patient is asked to indicate how frequently each comment was true for them during the past 7 days with respect to their experience with OCD).

The CRIES is a 13-item, 4-point scale assessing psychological distress. It has three subscales: intrusion, avoidance, and arousal. It is based off the Impact of Event Scale (IES) and is designed to address misinterpretation of items by children on the IES. It is designed for children 8 years of age and above to read independently. If the score is greater than or equal to 30, the score is indicative of increased subjective stress.

Scores taken repeatedly overtime between diagnosis and follow-up (at every clinic visit as well as 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and 2 years post diagnosis)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Psychological Stress Experiences
Time Frame: Scores taken repeatedly overtime between diagnosis and follow-up (at every clinic visit as well as 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and 2 years post diagnosis)
Assesses the thoughts or feelings about the world in the context of environmental or internal challenges. Patients will complete at the time of enrollment, any additional clinical visit, including 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and 2 years post diagnosis. There are 19 questions that are rated on a 1-5 scale. Overall, this outcome measure is scored 18-95 (lower score = less stress). Raw scores are then converted into T-scores. The investigators expect scores to increase during the early stages of treatment by at least 5 points (MCID) in the first 3 months and then decrease over time returning to baseline or above at 1- to 2-year follow up post diagnosis.
Scores taken repeatedly overtime between diagnosis and follow-up (at every clinic visit as well as 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and 2 years post diagnosis)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Symptoms
Time Frame: Scores taken repeatedly overtime between diagnosis and follow-up (at every clinic visit as well as 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and 2 years post diagnosis)
This questionnaire assesses for anxiety in children and adolescents (ages 11-17). Patients will complete at the time of enrollment, any additional clinical visit, including 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and 2 years post diagnosis. There are 8 questions that are rated on a 1-5 scale. Overall, this outcome measure is scored 14-70 (higher score = greater severity in depression). Raw scores are then converted into T-scores. The investigators expect scores to increase during the early stages of treatment by at least 5 points (MCID) in the first 3 months and then decrease over time returning to baseline or above at 1- to 2-year follow up post diagnosis.
Scores taken repeatedly overtime between diagnosis and follow-up (at every clinic visit as well as 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and 2 years post diagnosis)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Scores taken repeatedly overtime between diagnosis and follow-up (at every clinic visit as well as 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and 2 years post diagnosis)
This questionnaire assesses for depression in children and adolescents (ages 11-17). Patients will complete at the time of enrollment, any additional clinical visit, including 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and 2 years post diagnosis. There are 8 questions that are rated on a 1-5 scale. Overall, this outcome measure is scored 14-70 (higher score = greater severity in depression). Raw scores are then converted into T-scores.
Scores taken repeatedly overtime between diagnosis and follow-up (at every clinic visit as well as 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and 2 years post diagnosis)
ACL-Return to Sports after Injury (ACL-RSI)
Time Frame: Scores taken repeatedly overtime between diagnosis and follow-up (at every clinic visit as well as 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and 2 years post diagnosis)
Questionnaire used to measure the psychological impact of returning to sport after ACL reconstruction surgery. Patients will complete this questionnaire at the clinic visit when they are cleared to RTS, 1 year and 2 years post diagnosis. There are 12 questions that are rated on a 0-10 scale. Overall, this outcome measure is scored 0-100 (higher score = more psychologically ready to RTS). A score greater than or equal to 77% indicates that the patient is psychologically ready to RTS.
Scores taken repeatedly overtime between diagnosis and follow-up (at every clinic visit as well as 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and 2 years post diagnosis)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthew D Milewski, MD, Boston Children's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychological Stress

Clinical Trials on Surgical Treatment

3
Subscribe