Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Treatment Outcomes of Garlic Gel and Calcium Hydroxide as an Intracanal Medicament in Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment of Permanent Teeth.

January 1, 2026 updated by: Zara Rizwan, University of Health Sciences Lahore

Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Treatment Outcomes of Garlic Gel and Calcium Hydroxide as an Intracanal Medicament in Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment of Permanent Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Researchers want to check how well garlic works inside permanent teeth as a medicament during root canal treatments. Garlic has shown to possess many helpful properties, like reducing inflammation, helping wounds heal, and antimicrobial characteristics. Because conventional medicaments can be expensive or have potential side effects, researchers are actively exploring natural options like garlic. Some lab studies have already shown that garlic gel can kill the microbes inside the teeth. However, no real-life clinical or X-ray studies have been done on using garlic in permanent teeth. This study may help scientists find a much safer and effective new material for dental treatments in the future.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Clinical trials are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of Allium sativum as an intracanal medicament due to its various useful properties, such as anti-inflammatory, wound healing action, and antimicrobial properties. To overcome the problems with synthetic medicament, researchers are looking for natural alternatives due to their low cost, easy availability, and safety. The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic treatment outcomes of using garlic gel and calcium hydroxide paste as an intracanal medicament in nonsurgical root canal treatment of permanent teeth in terms of:

  • Pain.
  • Tenderness to palpation.
  • Tenderness to percussion.
  • Size of Periapical radiolucency.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

96

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Zara Rizwan, Bachelors of Dental Surgery
  • Phone Number: +92 +923044232107
  • Email: zararizwan95@gmail.com

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with the physical status of ASA I and ASA II according to ASA classification.
  • Patients aged from 15-45 years.
  • Mature permanent single-rooted teeth with closed apices.
  • Patients with clinical signs of symptomatic apical periodontitis (pain, tenderness to palpation, and percussion).
  • Patients having radiographic evidence of periapical radiolucency of endodontic origin.
  • Patients who have not taken antibiotics for the past 14 days.
  • Cooperative patients who show good compliance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with physical status of ASA III, IV, and V according to ASA classification.
  • Teeth with a calcified pulp chamber in periapical radiography.
  • Patients who have undergone previous endodontic treatment failure and those with the presence of sinus tract on clinical examination.
  • Teeth having advanced periodontal disease, with the basic periodontal examination (BPE) of 3 and 4.
  • Presence of internal and external resorption of the root as viewed on the periapical radiograph.
  • Presence of vertical root fracture and perforation as viewed on the periapical radiograph

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group(n=48)
Garlic gel will be used as an intracanal medicament
Patients will receive informed consent, clinical exam, and preoperative radiographs. After anesthesia and rubber dam isolation, access, cleaning, and shaping of canals will be performed using standard endodontic techniques. A sterile paper point will be placed in the canal for pH evaluation, followed by placement of garlic gel with lentulo spiral and temporary restoration of MD Temp and GC Gold Label 2 GIC. Patients will return after 14 days; if symptoms persist, the medicament will be replaced, and the patient will be reviewed again after 14 days and then after one month. Final obturation will only be done once all symptoms have resolved. If the experimental group continues to show symptoms after three dressings, the case will be considered a failure and treated conventionally. When asymptomatic, the medicament will be removed, canals will be irrigated, dried, obturated with gutta-percha and Endoplus sealer. Radiographic outcomes will be evaluated after 6 months by 2 endodontists.
Active Comparator: Control group(n=48)
Patients will receive informed consent, clinical exam, and preoperative radiographs. After anesthesia and rubber dam isolation, access, cleaning, and shaping of canals will be performed using standard endodontic techniques. Calcium hydroxide (control) will be placed as intracanal medicament, followed by temporary restoration of Cavit and Glass Ionomer cement. After 14 days, if clinical symptoms of pain, tenderness to palpation and percussion resolve, the medicament will be removed, and the canal will be obturated and permanently restored. However, if the patient remains clinically symptomatic, then another dressing of calcium hydroxide will be placed. Finally, clinical outcomes will be recorded after a month and obturation will be delayed until the complete resolution of clinical signs and symptoms. Patients will return after 6 months for clinical and radiographic evaluation, with pre- and postoperative radiographs compared by two endodontists.
Patients will receive informed consent, clinical exam, and preoperative radiographs. After anesthesia and rubber dam isolation, access, cleaning, and shaping of canals will be performed using standard endodontic techniques. A sterile paper point will be placed in the canal for pH evaluation, followed by placement of garlic gel with lentulo spiral and temporary restoration of MD Temp and GC Gold Label 2 GIC. Patients will return after 14 days; if symptoms persist, the medicament will be replaced, and the patient will be reviewed again after 14 days and then after one month. Final obturation will only be done once all symptoms have resolved. If the experimental group continues to show symptoms after three dressings, the case will be considered a failure and treated conventionally. When asymptomatic, the medicament will be removed, canals will be irrigated, dried, obturated with gutta-percha and Endoplus sealer. Radiographic outcomes will be evaluated after 6 months by 2 endodontists.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC OUTCOMES
Time Frame: Time frame for clinical outcomes: Baseline to 2 weeks Time frame for radiographic outcomes: Baseline to 6 months

Clinical success will be based on the absence of the following clinical signs and symptoms:

Pain Tenderness to palpation of adjacent soft tissues Tenderness to percussion of involved tooth Radiographic outcomes will be measured in terms of size of Periapical radiolucency. The Periapical status will be assessed using the periapical index (PAI) scoring system by Orstavik. Each tooth will be assigned one of the Periapical index scores for 5 categories within the scale.

SCORE POSSIBLE OUTCOME

  1. Normal periapical structure
  2. Small changes in bone structures
  3. Change in bone structure with mineral loss
  4. Periodontitis with well-defined radiolucency
  5. Severe periodontitis with exacerbating features

Periapical radiolucency will be classified as resolved if the Periapical index score is less than or equal to score of 2.

Time frame for clinical outcomes: Baseline to 2 weeks Time frame for radiographic outcomes: Baseline to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zara Rizwan, Bachelors of Dental Surgery, University of Health Science

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 1, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Sharing IPD in a way that compromises privacy would violate patient consent agreements and breach significant global privacy laws.

Study Data/Documents

  1. Study Protocol
    Information identifier: PMID: 35852013
    Information comments: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Apical Periodontitis

Clinical Trials on Allium Sativum as an intracanal medicament

Subscribe