Virtual Reality and Prevention of Bullying

April 26, 2019 updated by: Narcis Cardoner, MD, PhD

Effect of Bullying Content Presented in Immersive 360º-video on Pupil's Cognitive and Psychophysiological Responses

The lack of empathy towards victims of bullying is thought to play a main role in this extended and pernicious peer victimization behaviour. Thus, promoting empathy in school programs might be a promising approach for bullying prevention. Virtual reality (VR) allows creating an environment very similar to the real world and has proved to promote empathy.

Therefore, by employing VR, pupils may better understand and feel the experience of being bullied. As there is no evidence of the efficiency of VR in bullying prevention, the first step is to validate the content of the environments created.

In this line, the current study aims to investigate if 360º-videos produce a truthful experience of being bullied superior than the observed in traditional computer screens. The effect of all, 360º-videos and 2D computer screens will be assessed through objective (electrodermal activity -EDA- and heart rate -HR-) and subjective (self-administered tests) measures.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Introduction and Rationale: Previous research suggests that working on the development of cognitive-emotional skills, and particularly on empathy toward victims of bullying, may be a central component for the success of school bullying prevention programs. On the other hand, virtual reality (VR) technology allows adopting the perspective of the world of others, and thus has been claimed to be a powerful tool for eliciting empathy in different domains (cf. Slater & Sánchez-Vives, 2016). Therefore, VR might play a role in bullying prevention programs, by helping pupils to understand how it feels to be bullied, as a way to increase empathy towards victims of bullying. However, currently empirical evidence of the effectiveness of VR in this context is lacking. A key step in the validation of this use of VR is to understand how the immersive presentation of bullying scenes shot from a first-person perspective is experienced by children, compared to the same scenes presented in less immersive displays. In particular, in order to demonstrate the potential of VR technology in this regard, it is necessary to examine the advantages that VR technology (and, more specifically in this case, immersive presentation of 360º-video) presents over more common devices (a computer screen).

Study goals and Hypotheses: The overall goal of this study is to examine whether 360º-videos representing situations of bullying from a first-person perspective produce a realistic experience of being bullied, and that the presentation of such contents in an immersive mode (using a VR headset) elicit a more realistic and arousing experience than the same contents in a less immersive format (a traditional computer screen).

This is the first step in a wider research project; in subsequent steps, the investigators will assess the effects of these type of videos on empathy towards victims of bullying and, eventually, on prevalence of bullying behaviour.

The central hypotheses to be tested will be:

Hypothesis 1 (H1): Contents representing situations of bullying from a first person perspective will elicit on participants realistic feelings of being bullied, compared to contents representing other high-school daily situations not involving (physical or verbal) violence.

Hypothesis 2 (H2): Immersive presentation (i.e. 360º-video contents watched in a VR headset) will elicit higher arousal and higher perceived realism of the scene than the same contents presented in a less immersive display (a computer screen).

In order to test these hypotheses, the investigators will collect measures of psychophysiological measures of arousal (electrodermal activity -EDA- and heart rate -HR-) and emotional regulation (heart rate variability -HRV-), self-reported emotional arousal and valence, as well as three self-reported measures of the realism of the experience of being bullied, including: (1) participant's perception on to which degree the represented situation can be considered bullying, (2) participant's feelings of actually being in the represented scene ("presence"), and (3) participant's feeling of actually being bullied while watching the content.

The investigators expect that, compared to watching videos representing other high-school daily situations not involving (physical or verbal) violence, watching videos representing situations of bullying, participants' EDA, HR, HRV, and self-reported arousal will be higher (H1a, H1b, H1c, and H1d, respectively), self-reported valence will be more negative (H1e), scores of feelings of being bullying and actually being in the scene will be higher (H1f and H1g, respectively), and the perception of the scene as bullying will also be enhanced (H1h).

It is also expected that, compared to the videos presented in a screen, while watching the videos in a VR headset participants' EDA, HR, HRV, and self-reported arousal will be higher (H2a, H2b, H2c, and H2d, respectively), self-reported valence will be more negative (H2e), scores of feelings of being bullying and actually being in the scene will be higher (H2f and H2g, respectively), and the perception of the scene as bullying will also be enhanced (H2h).

In addition, it will be explored whether the experienced arousal and perception of realism is associated with personality traits, such as being uncaring, unemotional, and callousness. The investigators believe that pupils with higher scores on the mentioned traits will experience less arousal (subjective and psychophysiological) when watching the videos with bullying content.

Experimental design: The study adopts a within-subject design in which each participant will watch four videos, containing the four possible combinations of two independent variables: Level of immersion (VR headset / computer screen) and Type of content (Bullying / no-bullying content).

The materials to be used in the experiment will be eight videos representing different scenes from the perspective of a girl (to be watched by female participants) and four videos representing different scenes from the perspective of a boy (to be watched by male participants). Among each group of eight videos, there are four pairs. The two videos of each pair involve the same location, point-of-view, and actors, but in one of them there is a bullying situation and in the other there is a daily situation not involving any form of violence (e.g. children chatting about the last weekend).

Each participant will watch four scenes, two containing bullying scenes and the other containing daily non-violent scenes. Also, two of them will be presented in a VR headset while the rest be presented in a computer screen. The level of immersion and type of content in which each scene is presented will vary among participants following a Latin-square design, in a way such for the whole sample of participants, all the scenes will be presented across the two levels of immersion and the two types of content. The order of the presentation of the four conditions will be randomised for each participant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sabadell, Spain, 08208
        • Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

9 years to 12 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All pupils assisting 5th and 6th grade of primary school (Spain education system) of the "Escola Parc del Guinardó" school
  • Pupils whos parents have read, understand and approved the informed consent of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pupils whose parents have not approved their inclusion in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Video watching

All participants will watch 4 videos of potential everyday school situations, adapted for boys and girls.

Videos contain different levels of bullying (presence/absence) and virtual reality (presence/absence).

Every pupil will watch the 4 types of video content randomly.

Immersive videos (360º) filmed by 12-14 year old pupils who, guided by professional actors, represented the subjective experience of bullying.

Eight different potential situations designed depending on the sex of the pupil were filmed:

Girls:

  1. Classmates steal her personal diary
  2. Classmates tear her clothing
  3. Classmates insult her and steal her belongings
  4. Classmates deliberately exclude her in class

Boys:

  1. Classmates exclude him while playing with a ball
  2. Classmates bother him in the dining room
  3. Classmates insult and steal him in class
  4. Classmates insult him and steal his belongings

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-assessment manikin (SAM)
Time Frame: Baseline
Arousal and valence (5-point graphic scale)
Baseline
Heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV)
Time Frame: Baseline
An electrocardiogram will be recorded as an indirect indicator of the physiological arousal.
Baseline
Electrodermal activity (EDA)
Time Frame: Baseline
The skin conductance will be registered as an indirect indicator of the physiological arousal. Tonic and phasic measures will be registered.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits (ICU) in Children
Time Frame: Baseline

The self-report version of the ICU assesses uncaring, unemotional, and callousness traits.

Te scale has 24-items, ranked on a 4-point Likert scale, from 0 (not at all true) to 3 (definitely true). Possible scores ranges from 0-72, where higher scores indicate greater presence of the construct.

Baseline
Empathy toward victim
Time Frame: Baseline
7-item scale to assess empathy towards bullying. Higher scores indicate greater presence of the construct.
Baseline
Ad-hoc items regarding bullying
Time Frame: Baseline

Two ad-hoc items on how much the video presents a situation of "bullying", and to which extent the participant feel "been bullied" while watching the video. 5-point Likert scale in which 0 means "none" and 5 "absolutely". The items were:

  1. I think the video represents a situation of harassment
  2. I have really felt harassed while looking at the video
Baseline
Ad-hoc item on "presence"
Time Frame: Baseline

Feeling of being involved in the virtual environment. 5-point Likert scale in which 0 means "none" and 5 "absolutely". The item was:

3. I felt that I was "there" in the video scene

Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Narcís Cardoner, MD, PhD, Corporacion Parc Tauli
  • Principal Investigator: Miguel Barreda, PhD, Eurecat, Centre Tecnològic de Catalunya

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 10, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 12, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 12, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CSMPT_NC_2019_1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bullying of Child

Clinical Trials on Virtual Reality of Bullying

3
Subscribe