Bougie Assisted Endotracheal Intubation in Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Mask And Fastrach Intubating Laryngeal Mask

April 26, 2019 updated by: Ghada A.Kamhawy, Suez Canal University

A Comparative Study Between Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Mask And Fastrach Intubating Laryngeal Mask By Using Bougie Assisted Endotracheal Intubation

This study aims to compare using bougie as an assistant for endotracheal intubation through Air-Q and Fastrach intubating laryngeal mask devices when blind intubation fails as attempt to increase its success rate.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators hypothesis that using bougie with its smaller caliber or lesser size can facilitate intubation and improve success rate when blind intubation through both devices fails.

Study objectives

  • To make a comparison between Air-Q intubating laryngeal mask and Fastrach intubating laryngeal mask by using bougie assisted endotracheal intubation through both devices in patients undergoing elective surgeries in Suez Canal Hospitals.
  • To assess the first trial success rate, the total success rate, time to tracheal intubation, the number of attempts, hemodynamics and adverse events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 12311
        • Ghada A.Kamhawy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged >18 years old.
  • Gender both male and female.
  • Patients are ASA I (American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status Grade I) normal healthy patients or ASA II patients with mild systemic disease and no functional limitations

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any disorder of the cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, or gastrointestinal systems known from history or general examination.
  • Patients with unstable cervical spine
  • Any medical disease that may affect airway as Rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Patient refusal to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: AIR-Q group
the group which selected randomly to try AIR-Q device

Endotracheal tube introducers (gum elastic bougie) for emergency intubation The endotracheal tube introducer (ETI) is an effective and inexpensive adjunct to difficult airway management that is easy to use.

ETI is solid introducer 60-70 cm long with a 35 - 40 distally angulated (Coude) tip. They are easy to use, widely available, and have been used as adjuncts to difficult direct laryngoscopy for many decades.

The gum elastic bougie is usually guided by tactile clicks as the device passes the cartilage rings of the trachea. After Supraglottic devices are removed, an ETT can subsequently be railroaded over the bougie.

Other Names:
  • The Gum Elastic Bougie
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: I-LMA group
the group which selected randomly to try I-LMA device

Endotracheal tube introducers (gum elastic bougie) for emergency intubation The endotracheal tube introducer (ETI) is an effective and inexpensive adjunct to difficult airway management that is easy to use.

ETI is solid introducer 60-70 cm long with a 35 - 40 distally angulated (Coude) tip. They are easy to use, widely available, and have been used as adjuncts to difficult direct laryngoscopy for many decades.

The gum elastic bougie is usually guided by tactile clicks as the device passes the cartilage rings of the trachea. After Supraglottic devices are removed, an ETT can subsequently be railroaded over the bougie.

Other Names:
  • The Gum Elastic Bougie

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
success rate of endotracheal intubation on the first, second and third attempts in both devices Air-Q and fastrach
Time Frame: 180 seconds after anethesia induction
If the blind intubation is failed through Air Q or Fastrack Intubating laryngeal mask the investigator will use gum elastic bougie to facilitate introducing an endotracheal tube estimation of success rate of endotracheal intubation on the first, second and third attempts
180 seconds after anethesia induction
The time needed for devices insertion (Air Q and Fastrach Intubating Laryngeal mask)
Time Frame: !80 seconds after anesthesia induction
  1. Air Q and Fastrach Intubating laryngeal mask insertion time in seconds will be measured (device time).
  2. Endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion time will be measured ( ETT time).
  3. Total insertion time will be estimated (Device Time + ETT Time )
!80 seconds after anesthesia induction

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: Intraoperative and in the first 48 postoperative hours
Incidence of adverse events and complications during and after the procedure will be also recorded. Complications, including laryngospasm, bleeding, false passage, and sore throat will be recorded intraoperatively and in the first 48 postoperative hours.
Intraoperative and in the first 48 postoperative hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ghada A. Kamhawy, Lecturer, Suez Canal University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Ghada

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intubation;Difficult

Clinical Trials on Endotracheal tube introducers

Subscribe