Cervical Sensorimotor Control Training in Chronic Neck Pain

Effects of Cervical Sensorimotor Control Training in Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain

Impaired cervical joint position sense is associated with neck pain. This study will determine the effects of sensorimotor control training exercises on cervical joint position, pain, ROM and function in nonspecific chronic neck pain. There will be two groups ; experimental and control. Half of study group will receive cervical sensorimotor control training exercises and half of study group will receive conventional physiotherapy protocol.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Cervical sensorimotor control training exercises; Other: Conventional Exercises

Detailed Description

The study is Randomized Control Trail , which is being conducted in physical therapy Out patient department of Pakistan Railway hospital (April 2019-July 2019) . Sample size of 18 individual was calculated using Epitool with 95% confidence interval (CI), and power 80%. Individual will be screened out according to inclusion criteria. Individuals will be allocated randomly into two groups , 9 in cervical Sensori-motor training group and 9 in conventional physiotherapy protocol group by sealed envelope method.

Both groups will receive conventional physiotherapy protocol (hot pack, stretching exercises and strengthening exercises) for neck pain in common and the experimental group will receive cervical sensorimotor control training in addition to conventional protocol.

Assessment will be done on baseline and 6th week.

Data will be analysed on SPSS version 21.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 28
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Pakistan
  • Punjab
    • Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan, 40100
      • Pakistan Railway Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 30 years to 50 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age between 20 to 50 years
• Non specific neck pain
• Insidious neck pain for at least 3 month
• Average pain intensity over the past week >4 on Numeric Pain Rating Scale(NPRS)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Previous history of neck and head trauma or surgery
• Inflammatory joint disease
• Systemic conditions
• Cognitive impairment
• Taking four or more medications

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group I; This group of participant will receive Cervical sensorimotor control training exercises. In addition to it conventional physical therapy protocol will be given.	Other: Cervical sensorimotor control training exercises; Cervical sensory motor training exercises consisting of cervical position sense and cervical movement sense exercises with 3 levels of difficulty and 5 repetitions * 3 sets for each exercise will be given. Some exercises are: Head relocation with laser feedback: head relocation to neutral and predetermined position with eyes opened (in horizontal / vertical direction) (5 reps x 3 sets) Head relocation to neutral, predetermined and to specific targets with eyes opened (in diagonal directions) (5 reps x 3 sets) Head relocation to neutral and predetermined position with eyes closed (in all directions)(5 reps x 3 sets) In addition to it conventional physical therapy protocol consisting of Generalized stretching and cervical strengthening exercises along with joint mobility.; Other Names: Prioprioception Exercises
Active Comparator: Group II Control; this group of participant will receive Conventional physical therapy protocol.	Other: Conventional Exercises; conventional physical therapy protocol consisting of Generalized stretching and cervical strengthening exercises along with joint mobility exercises will be given to patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Cervical Joint position error	The task is to return head to the starting position as accurately as possible. Three trials will be performed of right and left rotation and extension. An average absolute error of > 4.5° in any direction is indicative of a deficit in cervical joint position sense	Baseline
Cervical Joint position error	The task is to return head to the starting position as accurately as possible. Three trials will be performed of right and left rotation and extension. An average absolute error of > 4.5° in any direction is indicative of a deficit in cervical joint position sense	post 6th week
Clinical test of sensory interaction and balance (CTSIB)	This test is design to assess how well an older adult is using sensory inputs when one or more sensory systems are compromise. Begin timing each trial using a stopwatch. The trial is over when (a) the participant opens his/her eyes in an eyes closed condition, (b) raises arms from sides, (c) loses balance and requires manual assistance to prevent a fall	Baseline
Clinical test of sensory interaction and balance (CTSIB)	This test is design to assess how well an older adult is using sensory inputs when one or more sensory systems are compromise. Begin timing each trial using a stopwatch. The trial is over when (a) the participant opens his/her eyes in an eyes closed condition, (b) raises arms from sides, (c) loses balance and requires manual assistance to prevent a fall	post 6th week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS)	Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) is an 11 point (0-10) Scale used to measure pain. Patient verbally select value between (0-10) on the basis of intensity of pain. (0) means No pain and (10) means maximum pain experienced at baseline.	Baseline
Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS)	Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) is an 11 point (0-10) Scale used to measure pain. Patient verbally select value between (0-10) on the basis of intensity of pain. (0) means No pain and (10) means maximum pain experienced at 6th week of intervention.	post 6th week
Neck Disability Index (NDI):	Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a questionnaire designed to assess how neck pain has affected patient's ability to manage in everyday life. It has total 10 sections, For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0, if the last statement is marked it = 5. If all ten sections are completed the score is calculated and converted into percentages. The maximum Score of Neck Disability Index (NDI) is 50. It is measured at Baseline before Intervention.	Baseline
Neck pain and disability index (NDI):	Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a questionnaire designed to assess how neck pain has affected patient's ability to manage in everyday life. It has total 10 sections, For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0, if the last statement is marked it = 5. If all ten sections are completed the score is calculated and converted into percentages. The maximum Score of Neck Disability Index (NDI) is 50. It is measured after 6th week of Intervention.	post 6th week
CROM (inclinometer)	A cervical range of motion (CROM) inclinometer will be use to assess cervical range of motion in flexion, extension, left right lateral flexion and left-right rotation. Participants will be seated upright and asked to actively move their neck in each direction.	Baseline
CROM (inclinometer)	A cervical range of motion (CROM) inclinometer will be use to assess cervical range of motion in flexion, extension, left right lateral flexion and left-right rotation. Participants will be seated upright and asked to actively move their neck in each direction.	post 6th week
Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)	The patient-specific functional scale (PSFS) will be use to assess participants' functional status. Participants will be ask to nominate 3 to 5 activities that they are unable to do or having difficulty doing because of their neck pain. These activities will be rated on a 0-10 scale, where 0 is unable to perform the activity and 10 is able to perform the activity at same. An average of all activities scores will be use for analysis	baseline
Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)	The patient-specific functional scale (PSFS) will be use to assess participants' functional status. Participants will be ask to nominate 3 to 5 activities that they are unable to do or having difficulty doing because of their neck pain. These activities will be rated on a 0-10 scale, where 0 is unable to perform the activity and 10 is able to perform the activity at same. An average of all activities scores will be use for analysis	post 6th week

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Javanshir K, Ortega-Santiago R, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Miangolarra-Page JC, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Exploration of somatosensory impairments in subjects with mechanical idiopathic neck pain: a preliminary study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Sep;33(7):493-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.08.022.
• Saadat M, Salehi R, Negahban H, Shaterzadeh MJ, Mehravar M, Hessam M. Postural stability in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain: A comparative study with healthy people. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2018 Apr 23;32:33. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.32.33. eCollection 2018.
• de Vries J, Ischebeck BK, Voogt LP, van der Geest JN, Janssen M, Frens MA, Kleinrensink GJ. Joint position sense error in people with neck pain: A systematic review. Man Ther. 2015 Dec;20(6):736-44. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.04.015. Epub 2015 May 2.
• Beinert K, Taube W. The effect of balance training on cervical sensorimotor function and neck pain. J Mot Behav. 2013;45(3):271-8. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2013.785928.
• Swait G, Rushton AB, Miall RC, Newell D. Evaluation of cervical proprioceptive function: optimizing protocols and comparison between tests in normal subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 15;32(24):E692-701. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5a1b.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): April 25, 2019
• Primary Completion (Actual): June 30, 2019
• Study Completion (Actual): June 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 27, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 30, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): May 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): August 9, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 8, 2019
• Last Verified: August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Cervical Pain; Kinesthesis
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Neck Pain
• Other Study ID Numbers: RiphahIU Aruba Iram

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No