Intramedullary Nailing vs External Ring Fixation for the Treatment of Tibial Shaft Fractures (IMVEX)

June 19, 2023 updated by: Rasmus Elsøe, Aalborg University Hospital

Intramedullary Nailing Versus External Ring Fixation for Surgical Treatment of Tibial Shaft Fractures in Adults and Their One Year Outcome on Recovery: Study Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (The IMVEX Trial)

This study is a multicenter pragmatic assessor blinded randomized and prospective clinical trial in which standard intramedullary nailing is compared with external ring fixator for patients with tibial shaft fractures.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

This study is a multicenter pragmatic assessor blinded randomized and prospective clinical trial in which standard intramedullary nailing is compared with external ring fixator for patients with tibial shaft fractures.

The primary aim of the project is to compare the one-year Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Sport (KOOS-Sport) after standard intramedullary nailing with external ring fixation for patients with tibial shaft fractures.

The explorative aim is to report the effect of the two surgical procedures on the development of complications, time to bone union, pain reactions, muscle strength, activity of daily living and time to return to work.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

67

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Rasmus Elsøe, PhD
  • Phone Number: +4597660000
  • Email: rae@rn.dk

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
        • Aalborg University Hospital, Department of orthopaedic surgery
      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8000
        • Aarhus University hospital
      • Viborg, Denmark, 8800
        • Regional Hospital Viborg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fracture of the tibial shaft
  • OTA classification Type: 42-A1-A3, -B1-B3 and -C1-C3
  • The fracture type is deemed operable by intramedullary nail

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Below 18 years of age
  • Open fracture
  • History of severe systemic diseases or cancer
  • Bilateral tibial shaft fracture
  • Multi fracture patients
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients without gait function prior to fracture

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intramedullary Nail
Intramedullary Nailing: Alignment will be obtained by closed or limited open reduction of the fracture. A standard reamed intramedullary nail is inserted. Access above the patella, through the patella tendon or parapatellar access is used according to surgeon preferences. One or more cortical screws may be used if deemed appropriate due to fracture pattern. Patients are administered preoperative antibiotics (Dicloxacillin) 15 minutes before surgery commences. Postoperative antibiotics is administered by discretion of the surgeon based on individual patient considerations.
fracture fixation of the tibial shaft fracture with an intramedullary nail.
Experimental: External Ring fixator
External Ring fixation: Closed or limited open reduction of the fracture is performed. A circular frame is attached on both sides of the fracture. Connection to the bone is obtained by hydroxyapatite coated half pins and/or k-wires with olives as needed according to surgeon preferences. One or more cortical screws may be used if deemed appropriate due to fracture pattern. After applying the ring fixator alignment is assessed radiologically and corrected both peri- and postoperatively. Patients are administered preoperative antibiotics (Dicloxacillin) preoperatively 15 minutes before surgery commences. Following surgery antibiotics are continued until wounds, pin- and wire perforations are dry.
fracture fixation of the tibial shaft fracture with an external ring fixator.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - sport (KOOS Sport)
Time Frame: 12 month follow up
KOOS-sport is a standardized and validated patient-reported instrument used in order to assess knee and knee associated problems with regards to activity. The subscale sport is one five subscales: pain, ADL, symptoms, sport and QOL in the KOOS questionnaire . A total score of 100 indicates no symptoms, and 0 indicates major symptoms.
12 month follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived Pain
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Development in pain in the two groups will be recorded by patient-reported pain intensity measured on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) with endpoints "no pain" and "maximal pain" for the worst pain during the last 24 hours and resting pain.
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Patient-reported pain reactions
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Pain DETECT questionnaire. The painDETECT screening questionnaire (PD-Q), uses a scoring method between - 1 and 38 to estimate the likelihood of a neuropathic pain component in patients.
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Pain sensitivity
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Pain sensitivity will be assessed by pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) recorded by handheld pressure algometry (Algometer Type II, Somedic AB, Sweden).
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Muscle strength
Time Frame: 6+12 months
Isometric muscle strength in the two groups will be measured by a strap-mounted dynamometer attached to the wall (Mecmesin AFG2500, Mecmesin Ltd, West Sussex, UK). Girth measures of thigh and calf will be used to examine muscle atrophy and/or effusion
6+12 months
Time to bone union
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Bone union, in the two surgical groups will be evaluated on standard AP and side X-rays of the fractured leg. The evaluation of bone union will be defined as: i) visible callus formation on at least three of four sides, no visible fracture line and no pain from fracture site at weight-bearing and during clinical examination.
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Radiological alignment
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Alignment of the tibia will be evaluated using the EOS scanning system.
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Health related QOL
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Eq5D-5L is a standardized questionnaire developed to assess general health outcome (29). It consists of five dimensions: Mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression, and a self-rated health scale on a 20 cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labelled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine'. An Eq5d-5L index of 1.0 indicated full health, 0 death, and -0.59 denoted a condition worse than death
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Time to return to work
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Measure the time from surgery to end of sick leave measured in days.
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Health economic evaluation
Time Frame: 12 months
Measure the cost of treatment in the two groups within the first year following surgery
12 months
Gait assessment
Time Frame: 3+6+12 months
Gait asymmetries will be measured with patients walking on a pressure-sensitive mat.
3+6+12 months
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)
Time Frame: 3+6+12 months
This instrument evaluate when the patient reaches a acceptable patient observed pain and function level, where the patient no longer demands treatment
3+6+12 months
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
KOOS is a standardized and validated patient-reported instrument used in order to assess knee and knee associated problems.The questionnaire includes five subscales: pain, ADL, symptoms, sport and QOL. A total score of 100 indicates no symptoms, and 0 indicates major symptoms.
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Foot And Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
FAOS is a standardized and validated patient-reported instrument used in order to assess foot and ankle associated problems divided into 5 subscales. The questionnaire includes five subscales: pain, ADL, symptoms, sport and QOL. A total score of 100 indicates no symptoms, and 0 indicates major symptoms.
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
Adverse events, defined as any negative or unwanted reactions to the two surgical procedures, will be recorded. These will include deep infection, pin infection, skin infections, malalignment, compartment syndrome or any other reported physical discomfort. An adverse effects committee will manage adverse reactions at the time of the adverse reaction.
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Rasmus Elsøe, PhD, Aalborg University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Rasmus Stokholm, MD, Aalborg University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Peter Larsen, PhD, Aalborg University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tibial Shaft Fracture

Clinical Trials on Intramedullary Nailing

3
Subscribe