- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03945669
Intramedullary Nailing vs External Ring Fixation for the Treatment of Tibial Shaft Fractures (IMVEX)
Intramedullary Nailing Versus External Ring Fixation for Surgical Treatment of Tibial Shaft Fractures in Adults and Their One Year Outcome on Recovery: Study Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (The IMVEX Trial)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study is a multicenter pragmatic assessor blinded randomized and prospective clinical trial in which standard intramedullary nailing is compared with external ring fixator for patients with tibial shaft fractures.
The primary aim of the project is to compare the one-year Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Sport (KOOS-Sport) after standard intramedullary nailing with external ring fixation for patients with tibial shaft fractures.
The explorative aim is to report the effect of the two surgical procedures on the development of complications, time to bone union, pain reactions, muscle strength, activity of daily living and time to return to work.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Rasmus Elsøe, PhD
- Phone Number: +4597660000
- Email: rae@rn.dk
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Peter Larsen, PhD
- Phone Number: +4597660000
- Email: peter.larsen@rn.dk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
- Aalborg University Hospital, Department of orthopaedic surgery
-
Aarhus, Denmark, 8000
- Aarhus University hospital
-
Viborg, Denmark, 8800
- Regional Hospital Viborg
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fracture of the tibial shaft
- OTA classification Type: 42-A1-A3, -B1-B3 and -C1-C3
- The fracture type is deemed operable by intramedullary nail
Exclusion Criteria:
- Below 18 years of age
- Open fracture
- History of severe systemic diseases or cancer
- Bilateral tibial shaft fracture
- Multi fracture patients
- Pregnancy
- Patients without gait function prior to fracture
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Intramedullary Nail
Intramedullary Nailing: Alignment will be obtained by closed or limited open reduction of the fracture.
A standard reamed intramedullary nail is inserted.
Access above the patella, through the patella tendon or parapatellar access is used according to surgeon preferences.
One or more cortical screws may be used if deemed appropriate due to fracture pattern.
Patients are administered preoperative antibiotics (Dicloxacillin) 15 minutes before surgery commences.
Postoperative antibiotics is administered by discretion of the surgeon based on individual patient considerations.
|
fracture fixation of the tibial shaft fracture with an intramedullary nail.
|
Experimental: External Ring fixator
External Ring fixation: Closed or limited open reduction of the fracture is performed.
A circular frame is attached on both sides of the fracture.
Connection to the bone is obtained by hydroxyapatite coated half pins and/or k-wires with olives as needed according to surgeon preferences.
One or more cortical screws may be used if deemed appropriate due to fracture pattern.
After applying the ring fixator alignment is assessed radiologically and corrected both peri- and postoperatively.
Patients are administered preoperative antibiotics (Dicloxacillin) preoperatively 15 minutes before surgery commences.
Following surgery antibiotics are continued until wounds, pin- and wire perforations are dry.
|
fracture fixation of the tibial shaft fracture with an external ring fixator.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - sport (KOOS Sport)
Time Frame: 12 month follow up
|
KOOS-sport is a standardized and validated patient-reported instrument used in order to assess knee and knee associated problems with regards to activity.
The subscale sport is one five subscales: pain, ADL, symptoms, sport and QOL in the KOOS questionnaire .
A total score of 100 indicates no symptoms, and 0 indicates major symptoms.
|
12 month follow up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Perceived Pain
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Development in pain in the two groups will be recorded by patient-reported pain intensity measured on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) with endpoints "no pain" and "maximal pain" for the worst pain during the last 24 hours and resting pain.
|
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Patient-reported pain reactions
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Pain DETECT questionnaire.
The painDETECT screening questionnaire (PD-Q), uses a scoring method between - 1 and 38 to estimate the likelihood of a neuropathic pain component in patients.
|
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Pain sensitivity
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Pain sensitivity will be assessed by pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) recorded by handheld pressure algometry (Algometer Type II, Somedic AB, Sweden).
|
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Muscle strength
Time Frame: 6+12 months
|
Isometric muscle strength in the two groups will be measured by a strap-mounted dynamometer attached to the wall (Mecmesin AFG2500, Mecmesin Ltd, West Sussex, UK).
Girth measures of thigh and calf will be used to examine muscle atrophy and/or effusion
|
6+12 months
|
Time to bone union
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Bone union, in the two surgical groups will be evaluated on standard AP and side X-rays of the fractured leg.
The evaluation of bone union will be defined as: i) visible callus formation on at least three of four sides, no visible fracture line and no pain from fracture site at weight-bearing and during clinical examination.
|
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Radiological alignment
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Alignment of the tibia will be evaluated using the EOS scanning system.
|
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Health related QOL
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Eq5D-5L is a standardized questionnaire developed to assess general health outcome (29).
It consists of five dimensions: Mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression, and a self-rated health scale on a 20 cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labelled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine'.
An Eq5d-5L index of 1.0 indicated full health, 0 death, and -0.59 denoted a condition worse than death
|
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Time to return to work
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Measure the time from surgery to end of sick leave measured in days.
|
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Health economic evaluation
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Measure the cost of treatment in the two groups within the first year following surgery
|
12 months
|
Gait assessment
Time Frame: 3+6+12 months
|
Gait asymmetries will be measured with patients walking on a pressure-sensitive mat.
|
3+6+12 months
|
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)
Time Frame: 3+6+12 months
|
This instrument evaluate when the patient reaches a acceptable patient observed pain and function level, where the patient no longer demands treatment
|
3+6+12 months
|
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
KOOS is a standardized and validated patient-reported instrument used in order to assess knee and knee associated problems.The questionnaire includes five subscales: pain, ADL, symptoms, sport and QOL.
A total score of 100 indicates no symptoms, and 0 indicates major symptoms.
|
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Foot And Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
FAOS is a standardized and validated patient-reported instrument used in order to assess foot and ankle associated problems divided into 5 subscales.
The questionnaire includes five subscales: pain, ADL, symptoms, sport and QOL.
A total score of 100 indicates no symptoms, and 0 indicates major symptoms.
|
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Adverse events
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Adverse events, defined as any negative or unwanted reactions to the two surgical procedures, will be recorded.
These will include deep infection, pin infection, skin infections, malalignment, compartment syndrome or any other reported physical discomfort.
An adverse effects committee will manage adverse reactions at the time of the adverse reaction.
|
6 weeks, 3+6+12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Rasmus Elsøe, PhD, Aalborg University Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Rasmus Stokholm, MD, Aalborg University Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Peter Larsen, PhD, Aalborg University Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- LERG1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Tibial Shaft Fracture
-
NYU Langone HealthNot yet recruitingFemoral Shaft Fracture | Tibial Shaft FractureUnited States
-
Isfahan University of Medical SciencesCompletedTibial Shaft FractureIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Sohag UniversityRecruiting
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCarbo-Fix OrthopaedicsTerminated
-
District Headquarters Teaching Hospital SahiwalCompletedTransverse Fracture of Shaft of TibiaPakistan
-
University of WashingtonTerminated
-
University of California, Los AngelesLos Angeles Orthopaedic HospitalCompleted
-
University of UtahEnrolling by invitationTibial Shaft Fracture | Tibial Plateau FractureUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityRecruitingOpen Type III (A&B)Pediatric and Adolescent Tibial Shaft Fractures | Ilizarov FixationEgypt
-
Washington University School of MedicineWithdrawnClosed Fracture of Shaft of Ulna | Closed Fracture of Shaft of RadiusUnited States
Clinical Trials on Intramedullary Nailing
-
Oulu University HospitalKanta-Häme Central Hospital; Bioretec Ltd.CompletedFractures, Bone | Injury ArmFinland
-
Christian CandrianRecruiting
-
Zimmer BiometRecruitingFemoral Shaft Fracture | Osteotomy | Trochanteric Fractures | Sub-trochanteric FracturesFrance
-
University of Sao PauloCompletedSurgical Wound Infection | Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary
-
University of California, San FranciscoOrthopaedic Trauma Association; Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute; Orthopaedic...Completed
-
University of PennsylvaniaSynthes USA HQ, Inc.CompletedAcute Tibial Fracture Requiring Intramedullary NailingUnited States
-
Danderyd HospitalCompletedIntertrochanteric FracturesSweden
-
Unity Health TorontoRecruiting