RevErsing Poor GrAft Function With eLtrombopag After allogeneIc Hematopoietic Cell trAnsplantation (REGALIA)

September 24, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Lille

RevErsing Poor GrAft Function With eLtrombopag After allogeneIc Hematopoietic Cell trAnsplantation: a Prospective, Phase II Study by the SFGM-TC

Poor graft function (PGF) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a misunderstood complication associated with poor outcome and limited therapeutic options. Despite the lack of standardized diagnostic criteria, PGF is commonly defined as follows: one or several significant cytopenias after allo-HCT persisting or developing after allo-HCT despite full donor chimerism and in the absence of relapse or other causes. Not only PGF can alter patients' quality of life by leading to recurrent transfusions, bleeding events and infections, but it is also associated with poor survival after allo-HCT.

Although PGF is relatively frequent, there is no well-codified behavior in the literature or in the recommendations issued by the various learned societies of transplantation.

The aim objective of the investigator's study is to demonstrate that eltrombopag improve PGF after allo-HCT

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

9

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lille, France
        • Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of poor graft function defined as:

    • Patient ≥ day+60 after allo-HCT,
    • Persisting thrombocytopenia on two different samples over at least two weeks (platelet < 30G/L with transfusion requirement) +/- neutropenia (ANC <1G/L) +/- anemia (Hb <8g/dL or transfusion requirement),
    • Full donor chimerism on whole blood (≥ 95%),
    • Biopsy proven hypocellular marrow without evidence of myelodysplasia
    • No evidence for relapse,
    • No evidence for active acute or chronic graft versus host disease,
    • Absence of active viral infection (EBV, CMV, ADENOVIRUS, PARVOVIRUS B19),
    • Absence of B9/B12 deficiency,
    • Absence of hypothyroidism,
    • Absence of hypogonadism,
    • Absence of dialysis,
    • Absence of thrombotic microangiopathy,
    • Absence of macrophage activation syndrome,
    • No other known causes of poor graft function.
  • Written informed consent must be obtained before any study-trial specific procedure are performed,
  • Affiliation to a social security system.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Criteria for poor graft function not fulfilled (see above),
  • Patients aged less than 6 years old (or unable to swallow),
  • Hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh ≥ 5),
  • Patients with bone morrow fibrosis,
  • Patients with a cytogenetic abnormality of chromosome 7
  • Hypersensitivity to eltrombopag or to any of the excipients,
  • Patients with any contra-indication to eltrombopag, filgrastim,
  • Unable to understand the investigational nature of the study or give informed consent,
  • History of congestive heart failure, arrhythmia requiring chronic treatment, arterial or venous,
  • Thrombosis (not excluding line thrombosis) within the last 1 year, or myocardial infarction within 3 months before enrollment,
  • ECOG Performance Status of 3 or greater,
  • Pregnant and/or lactating women,
  • Freedom privacy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: eltrombopag
Eligible patients will receive the investigational drug eltrombopag
eltrombopag at the starting dose of 50mg/day. After 2 weeks of eltrombopag initiation and in the absence of platelet response, eltrombopag will be increased every two weeks (50mg increase) up to a maximum dose of 150mg/day (2 maximum escalation from D1, with maximum dose escalation phase of 4 weeks).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Platelet response
Time Frame: at 12 weeks
Platelet response defined as a platelet count ≥ 30G/L at 12 weeks measured on at least two serial measurements performed 1 week apart and sustained for 1 month or more without support of platelet transfusions.
at 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to erythroid response
Time Frame: at 12 and 24 weeks
Time to erythroid response defined as an increase of at least 1.5g/dL without transfusion, that is sustained for at least 2 weeks and transfusion requirements at 12 and 24 weeks for BRC as compared with transfusion requirements during the eight weeks preceding study entry
at 12 and 24 weeks
Time to neutrophil response
Time Frame: at least 7 days
Time to neutrophil response defined as an increase of ANC above 1G/L, which is sustained for at least 7 days,
at least 7 days
Percentage of patients presenting best bone marrow response at 12 and 24 weeks of treatment assessed by bone marrow aspirate and bone marrow biopsy with fibrosis staining.
Time Frame: at 12 and 24 weeks
at 12 and 24 weeks
Transfusion requirements
Time Frame: at 12 and 24 weeks
Transfusion requirements for BRC and platelets as compared with transfusions requirements during the eight weeks preceding study entry
at 12 and 24 weeks
Proportion of patients presenting grade 3 or 4 adverse events from the first to the last administration of eltombopag.
Time Frame: from 1st administration of eltrombopag to 1 month after the last administration of eltrombopag,

All adverse events will be reported on the adverse events reporting form of the case report file. Each adverse event will be recorded individually.

The severity of the adverse event will be determined as follows :

  • Severe (grade 3): significant interference with the patient's daily activity and unacceptable,
  • Life-threatening (grade 4).
from 1st administration of eltrombopag to 1 month after the last administration of eltrombopag,
Quality of life evaluation using the European Organisation for Research Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire).
Time Frame: at 12 and 24 weeks

The QLQ-C30 consists of thirty items:

  • 05 functional scales to explore the physical (1 to 5), executive (6 to 7), social (26 and 27), cognitive (20 and 25), and emotional (21 to 24) dimensions of the quality of life.
  • 09 symptomatic scales to explore fatigue (10, 12 and 18), nausea symptoms (14 and 15), pain (9 and 19), dyspnea (8), insomnia (11), anorexia (13), diarrhea (17), constipation (16) and financial difficulties (28).
  • 01 scale measuring the overall quality of life of each patient (29 and 30). The results of these different scales allow the calculation of a score that varies from 0 (worst) to 100 (better). A high overall health score reflects good health and a good quality of life. A high score for a symptom scale reflects a high level of symptoms. An average difference of 5 to 10 scores between two visits indicates a minor change, from 10 to 20 a moderate change and a difference of more than 20 points a significant change.
at 12 and 24 weeks
Immune function (T/B/NK cells counts)
Time Frame: at 12 and 24 weeks
at 12 and 24 weeks
Overall survival, relapse-free survival and non-relapse mortality
Time Frame: at 24 weeks of treatment
No relapse disease will be investigated using the Fine-Gray Test. No relapse mortality represent all death without relapse of the underlind disease.
at 24 weeks of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha, MD,PhD, University Hospital, Lille

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 5, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 24, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 21, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Leukemia

Clinical Trials on eltrombopag

Subscribe