Cut-off Values of 6-min Walk Test and Sit-to-stand Test for Determining Symptom Burden and Functional Impairment in Atrial Fibrillation

October 10, 2021 updated by: Melih Zeren, Izmir Bakircay University
Cut-off values indicating higher symptom burden and impairment in health status in 6-min walk test and 30-second sit-to-stand test in patients with atrial fibrillation will be determined in the study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The 6-min walk test (6MWT) is the most used field test for measuring functional impairment in cardiopulmonary patients. However, to be able to objectively interpret 6MWT of a patient with specific chronic condition, the distance walked in 6MWT should be compared to either a healthy control group or a cut-off value that was specifically determined for that population. Such cut-off values are present for 6MWT in several cardiopulmonary diseases including COPD (350 m), heart failure (200 m) and pulmonary hypertension (400 m) for identifying patients with high mortality, poor prognosis and/or poor health status, but there is no cut-off value determined for atrial fibrillation (AF). The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) score is a practical measure for assessing symptom burden and functional impairment caused by AF-related symptoms. While EHRA class 1 indicates asymptomatic patients, EHRA class 2, 3 and 4 indicates higher severities of symptom burden and functional impairment. Primary aim of this study is to determine a cut-off value in 6MWT for discriminating between the asymptomatic and symptomatic AF patients according to EHRA classification. In addition, a cut-off value for 30-second sit-to-stand test will be determined in these patients as well, since sit-to-stand tests have gained a lot of interest in the recent literature for practically evaluating functional status in various cardiopulmonary conditions.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

125

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Institute of Cardiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 97 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Diagnosis of paroxysmal, persistant or permanent atrial fibrillation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of heart failure or any chronic respiratory disease
  • Recent coronary bypass surgery
  • Previous heart valve surgery
  • Rheumatic valvular heart disease
  • Recent acute myocardial infarction
  • Having a pacemaker

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Atrial fibrillation
Adult patients with atrial fibrillation
Symptom burden and functional impairment will be evaluated with EHRA Score, 6-min walk test and 30-second sit-to-stand test
Pulmonary function will be evaluated using basic spirometry and respiratory pressure meter.
Quality of life will be evaluated using Short Form-36 Questionnaire.
Physical activity level will be evaluated using International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) score
Time Frame: At baseline
Functional impairment and symptom burden of the patients will be determined according to The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) score. While EHRA class 1 indicates asymptomatic patients, EHRA class 2, 3 and 4 indicates higher severities of symptom burden and functional impairment, respectively.
At baseline
6-min walk distance
Time Frame: At baseline
Distance walked in six minutes will be recorded. Test will be conducted according to the guideline of American Thoracic Society (ATS).
At baseline
Number of repetitions in 30-second sit-to-stand test
Time Frame: At baseline
Participants will be asked to perform sit-to-stand maneuver as fast as possible for 30 seconds and the number of completed repetitions will be recorded.
At baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: At baseline
FVC will be measured using basic spirometry according to the guideline of European Respiratory Society (ERS)
At baseline
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)
Time Frame: At baseline
FEV1 will be measured using basic spirometry according to the guideline of European Respiratory Society (ERS)
At baseline
Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)
Time Frame: At baseline
PEF will be measured using basic spirometry according to the guideline of European Respiratory Society (ERS)
At baseline
Maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP)
Time Frame: At baseline
MIP will be measured using electronic mouth pressure meter according to the guideline of European Respiratory Society (ERS)
At baseline
Maximum expiratory pressure (MEP)
Time Frame: At baseline
MEP will be measured using electronic mouth pressure meter according to the guideline of European Respiratory Society (ERS)
At baseline
Short Form-36
Time Frame: At baseline
Short Form-36 questionnaire will be used to measure quality of life.
At baseline
International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form
Time Frame: At baseline
International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form will be used to measure physical activity level
At baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Evaluation of functional impairment

3
Subscribe