Lung Cancer Screening Protocol (I-STEP)

I-STEP: Increasing Screening Through Engaging Primary Care Providers

The successful implementation of lung cancer screening across diverse setting requires working with the community and primary care practices. Collaborating across diverse community-based sites will employ local knowledge and culture in the understanding of the health problem and identifying and implementing solutions that are appropriate for all partners (patients, primary care, referral centers). Enhanced, culturally-competent communication with patients at high risk for lung cancer can narrow inequities in screening awareness, referral, and utilization, as well as improve lung cancer outcomes across diverse patients and communities. Promoting partnerships among physicians, staff, and patients; creating routines; and tailoring materials to each clinician's situation have been show to increase the proportion of patients receiving screening.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

193

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Carbondale, Illinois, United States, 62901
        • Southern Illinois Healthcare
      • Decatur, Illinois, United States, 62526
        • Decatur Memorial Hospital
      • Mattoon, Illinois, United States, 61938
        • Sarah Bush Lincoln Health System
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62702
        • Memorial Health System
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine
      • Saint Peters, Missouri, United States, 63376
        • BJC HealthCare, Barnes-Jewish St. Peters Hospital
      • Springfield, Missouri, United States, 65802
        • CoxHealth

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be eligible to participate in the trial, screening centers have to be existing members of the BJC Collaborative.
  • Primary Care Providers have to have a referral relationship with the screening center; serve adult patients who may be screening-eligible, and are willing to interact with the referral site to implement referral for LDCT.

Exclusion Criteria:

There are not any exclusion criteria for the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lung Cancer Screening Toolbox
  • WU Staff will train local screening staff using a train-the-trainer model three months prior to the intervention and will provide technical assistance on an ongoing basis.
  • During the 3 hour train-the-trainer session, the selected staff from the referral sites will learn about the program, receive an orientation to the toolbox elements, and discuss how to adapt the elements of the toolbox to their referral sites.

-Toolbox of evidence-based elements that a primary care or referral site could implement to address known barriers to screening and referral, as well as required elements for screening. These elements will be designed to be adaptable to the unique needs and screening processes of the participating practices.

  • Patient education materials
  • Primary care practice educational materials
  • Pack-years/eligibility calculator
  • Local referral process guide
  • Smoking cessation materials and support
  • Shared decision-making guide
  • LDCT best practice guidelines

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of initial low-dose CT (LDCT) scan screenings per month per screening center
Time Frame: Completion of study (estimated to be 21 months)
-Screening will be defined as completed initial screen for lung cancer
Completion of study (estimated to be 21 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of primary care providers who refer at least two patients per month for LDCT
Time Frame: Completion of study (estimated to be 21 months)
Completion of study (estimated to be 21 months)
Percent of patients referred who are screen-eligible
Time Frame: Completion of study (estimated to be 21 months)
Defined as the number of screen-eligible patients divided by the total of screening procedures performed
Completion of study (estimated to be 21 months)
Percent of patients referred who complete screening
Time Frame: Completion of study (estimated to be 21 months)
Defined as the number of patients referred for screening divided by the total number of screening procedures performed.
Completion of study (estimated to be 21 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aimee S James, Ph.D., MPH, Washington University School of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Graham A Colditz, M.D., DrPH, Washington University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 22, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Practice level and screening center aggregate numbers may be made available to investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee ("learned intermediary") identified for this purpose

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning in 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Proposals should be directed to aimeejames@wustl.edu. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer Screening

Clinical Trials on Toolbox for Lung Cancer Screening

Subscribe