Lung Cancer Screening Implementation Among Employees at Lyon Hospital (ILYAD)

September 26, 2023 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Pilot Study on Lung Cancer Screening Implementation Among Employees at Lyon Hospital

Several randomized studies have demonstrated the efficiency of lung cancer screening (LCS) on mortality rates. However, screening efficiency is related to the targeted population and the participation rate.

In France, the participation rate for breast and colon cancer screening programs is respectively 50% and 32%, which is low. Then, it appears very important to determine which factors are influencing the willingness to participate to these programs. Indeed, it will allow a better communication and we will be able to perform screening campaigns adapted to the eligible population.

The Lyon Hospital is the second university hospital in France. It is composed of 14 buildings and employed 23 000 persons. More than 160 occupations are represented. So, hospital employees look relevant to be studied for LCS program.

ILYAD was divided in 2 parts. The first one was completed in 2020 and goal to evaluate the number of eligible individuals among the hospital employees. About 800 persons would be eligible for LCS.

This second part of the study will evaluate the participation rate and the feasibility of the LCS program. The study will target the 800 individuals that were identified previously.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bron, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital L. Pradel
        • Contact:
          • Michael Duruisseaux, MD
      • Lyon, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital de la Croix Rousse - Department of Pneumology
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lize KIAKOUAMA-MALEKA, MD
      • Pierre-Bénite, France, 69495

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

  • Inclusion Criteria :

    • Participant have to meet the criteria below:

Lyon hospital employee at the day of inclusion:

  • valid hospital employee number,
  • Or retired employee for less than a year before the inclusion

AND meeting eligibility criteria as follow :

  • Aged from 50 to 75 yo,
  • AND smoke or have smoked ≥ 10 cigarettes/day during ≥ 30 years OR ≥ 15 cigarettes/day for at least 25 years;
  • AND active smoker or smoking cessation for ≤ 15 years ;

    • Volunteer to start a program of smoking cessation if active smoker;
    • Consent form signed ;
    • Cover by health insurance.

      • Exclusion Criteria :

Participant have to NOT meet the criteria below :

  • Individual not working at Lyon hospital;
  • Individual not payed by the Lyon Hospital but working at it;
  • Individuals not willing to participate;
  • Individual working at René Sabran Hospital;
  • Individual meeting one of this non eligibility for LCS criteria defined by the French recommendation:

    • Not able to climb 2 floors of stairs ;
    • Weight ≥ 140Kg
    • Underwent a chest CT scan less than 1 year ago (except screening scanner);
    • History of lung cancer of less than 5 years or under treatment ; history of any cancer under monitoring by chest scanner ;
    • Comorbidity contraindicating therapeutic options or any kind of invasive interventions ;
    • Ongoing or recent respiratory symptoms that might lead to lung cancer diagnosis (hemoptysia, weight loss, recurrent respiratory infection).
  • Individual who is pregnant or breast feeding;
  • Individual whose mental health is not good enough to participate;
  • Individual in jail or under justice evaluation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lyon hospital employees with high risk of lung cancer.
Lyon Hospital employees meeting criteria for high risk of lung cancer according French recommendation criteria.
3 levels of solicitation will be cumulated. First : a Simple collective solicitation of all staff via internal media 4 months later : Personalized indirect solicitation of at-risk groups with information posted in identified areas 4 months later : Personalized direct solicitation of at-risk groups
  • spirometry examination
  • Questionnaires
  • Blood samples and breath samples to find biomarkers

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participation rate at baseline
Time Frame: At the baseline visit
Ratio between the number of participants who underwent a CT scan at baseline and the estimated number of eligible employees
At the baseline visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participation rate according to the 3 communication levels.
Time Frame: At 4 month = level 1 ; At 8 month = level 2 ; At 12 month = level 3
Ratio between the number of participants who underwent the baseline CT scan at level 1, 2 and 3 and the estimated number of eligible employees
At 4 month = level 1 ; At 8 month = level 2 ; At 12 month = level 3
Identification of predictive factors for participation decision
Time Frame: At baseline and At 1Year follow-up
Using the cox model to identify sociodemographic factors that could be associated with the participation rates for both round of CT scan.
At baseline and At 1Year follow-up
Evaluation of feasibility of the LCS program by measuring the proportion of individuals having undergo all the required exams and evaluations according to the results of the CT scan, conformity of the scan interpretation, and adverse event monitoring.
Time Frame: At baseline and At 1Year follow-up
Ratio between individuals who completed baseline and year 1 CT scan and the number of participants. And, the ratio of individuals who beneficiated conform care according to French recommendations.
At baseline and At 1Year follow-up
Evaluation of screening efficiency according to the proportion of lung cancer, ILD, COPD diagnosed and the percentage of smoking cessation among the active smokers.
Time Frame: At baseline and At 1Year follow-up
Ratio of lung cancer diagnosed Ration of ILD diagnosed Ratio of COPD diagnosed Ratio of smoking cessation
At baseline and At 1Year follow-up
Evaluate the participation rate at 1 year and identify the factors that trigger it.
Time Frame: At 1Year follow-up
Ratio between the number of participants who underwent the Year 1 CT scan and the number of participants.
At 1Year follow-up
Identification of efficient biomarker for LC screening
Time Frame: At baseline
Perform blood analysis to identify specific biomarkers and compare their sensibility, and predictive value with or without association with the CT scan.
At baseline
Evaluation of the efficiency of VOC for LC screening
Time Frame: At baseline
Perform air breath analysis to identify specific chemical species, compare their sensibility, and predictive value associated, and not with the CT scan.
At baseline
Evaluate the follow up to the french guidelines
Time Frame: Follow up after the 1 year visit
Ratio between the participant at the cohort and who have done the scanner 2 years post Year1 one, and the participant at the cohort.
Follow up after the 1 year visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 21, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 12, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 12, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Solicitation for lung cancer screening

3
Subscribe