Metabolic Responses of Dapagliflozin vs Sitagliptin in T2DM Patients Inadequately Controlled With Insulin Therapy

April 28, 2021 updated by: The University of Hong Kong

A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Metabolic Responses of Adding Dapagliflozin Versus Sitagliptin to Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled With Insulin Therapy (DISTINCTION Study)

The use of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) has been associated with increased serum ketone levels. However, most previous studies included subjects who were either insulin or even drug naïve with relatively short duration of diabetes. It is well known that insulin deficiency increases the risk of developing ketoacidosis with SGLT2 inhibitors. Moreover, since the glucose-lowering effect of SGLT2 inhibitors is at its maximum at 3 to 6 months after use, the extent of increase in serum ketone levels and its clinical relevance with chronic use of SGLT2 inhibitors, especially among insulin-treated patients that often have longer duration of diabetes and potentially more insulin deficient than those who are insulin naive, have not been clearly defined. Therefore, the investigators perform this randomised study to evaluate the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on serum ketone levels among Chinese patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with insulin therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors introduce a novel approach of glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Inhibition of SGLT2 causes glycosuria and lowers blood glucose levels regardless of insulin sensitivity and beta cell function. It has recently been shown that SGLT2 inhibition is efficacious and safe not only in diabetic patients with normal renal function but also in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3a [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 45-59 mL/min/1.73m2]. While the clinical efficacy has been well proven by various randomized controlled trials, the significance of increased serum ketone levels after SGLT2 inhibition, however, remains to be elucidated. Certainly, the risk of ketoacidosis, albeit small, has raised considerable concern among both patients and clinicians. On the other hand, although still controversial at this stage, an alternate fuel hypothesis has emerged that tries to explain the cardiovascular benefits observed with SGLT2 inhibitors.

Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the increased serum ketone levels after SGLT2 inhibition. In patients who are on background insulin therapy, reduced insulin dose, hoping to minimize risk of hypoglycaemia during concomitant use of SGLT2 inhibitors, could increase lipolysis and hepatic ketogenesis. In addition, even among those who are insulin naïve, the use of SGLT2 inhibitors might decrease renal clearance of ketone bodies, or increase ketone production through augmented glucagon to insulin ratio. Recent studies had also demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors shifted substrate utilization from glucose to lipid oxidation, thereby contributing to increased ketones production. In a study involving 9 subjects with T2DM treated with dapagliflozin, plasma ketone levels increased significantly from 0.05 mmol/L to 0.19 mmol/L over 2 weeks. In another study of 66 subjects with T2DM treated with empagliflozin, plasma ketone levels did not rise after a single dose administration but increased statistically from 0.02 mmol/L to 0.06 mmol/L after 4 weeks. Importantly, both studies included subjects who were either insulin or even drug naïve with relatively short duration of diabetes. It is well known that insulin deficiency increases the risk of developing ketoacidosis with SGLT2 inhibitors. Moreover, since the glucose-lowering effect of SGLT2 inhibitors is at its maximum at 3 to 6 months after use, the extent of increase in serum ketone levels and its clinical relevance with chronic use of SGLT2 inhibitors, especially among insulin-treated patients that often have longer duration of diabetes and potentially more insulin deficient than those who are insulin naive, have not been clearly defined. Therefore, the investigators perform this randomised study to evaluate the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on serum ketone levels among Chinese patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with insulin therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • L2 Diabetes Centre, Queen Mary Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chinese
  • Aged 21 to 75 both inclusive
  • Type 2 diabetes on single or two doses of insulin therapy with or without metformin, which include intermediate acting human insulin, premixed human insulin or insulin analogues
  • On stable insulin doses, as defined by less than 10% changes in total daily insulin dose within 3 months prior to randomization
  • Suboptimal glycaemic control with baseline HbA1c ≥8.0% and ≤10.5%, taken within 2 months prior to randomization
  • Body mass index between 21 and 40 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • History of ketoacidosis
  • Concurrent use of sulphonylurea or glucagon like peptide-1 receptor (GLP1) agonists
  • Prior use of SGLT2 inhibitors, DPP4-inhibitors or GLP1 agonists within 3 months of randomization
  • History of intolerance to SGLT2 inhibitors or DPP4-inhibitors
  • Concurrent use of loop diuretics
  • eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73m2 within 3 months prior to randomization
  • History of acute or chronic pancreatitis
  • History of benign or malignant pancreatic tumours
  • History of bladder cancer
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Women at childbearing age not using and refused to start chemical or mechanical contraception after randomization
  • Severe liver disease with elevated plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT) of more than five times the upper limit of normal, taken within 3 months prior to randomization
  • Active or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to randomization
  • Hospitalization for acute illness within 3 months prior to randomization
  • Severe mental disorder
  • Unable to understand written patient information and to give informed consent
  • Ongoing participation in other clinical intervention trials
  • Other unspecified concomitant conditions that deemed unsuitable for study participation upon professional judgments by principal investigators

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dapagliflozin
Dapagliflozin 10mg daily PO for 24 weeks
Dapagliflozin 10mg daily for 24 weeks
Other Names:
  • Forxiga
Active Comparator: Sitagliptin
Sitagliptin 100mg daily PO for 24 weeks
Sitagliptin 100mg daily for 24 weeks
Other Names:
  • Januvia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in serum ketone levels after treatment
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change in serum ketone levels before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in fasting glucose
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change in fasting plasma glucose before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
24 weeks
Change in glycated haemoglobin
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change in glycated haemoglobin before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
24 weeks
Change in body weight
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change in body weight before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
24 weeks
Change in blood pressure
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
24 weeks
Change in fasting lipid
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change in fasting lipid before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
24 weeks
Change in free fatty acid levels
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change in free fatty acid levels before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
24 weeks
Change in fasting glucagon levels
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change in fasting glucagon levels before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
24 weeks
Change in homeostasis model assessment 2 steady-state beta-cell function
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change in homeostasis model assessment 2 steady-state beta-cell function before and after treatment with either dapagliflozin or sitagliptin for 24 weeks
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kathryn Tan, MD, The University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 16, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 16, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 16, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will be shared upon special request to principal investigator.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Dapagliflozin 10 mg

3
Subscribe