- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03980912
Validation of the LiverFASt Test and the Associated Fibrosis Staging Scores Compared to Liver Tissue Pathology Via Liver Biopsy
Clinical Diagnostic Validation of the LiverFASt Test and the Associated Fibrosis Staging Scores for Activity/Inflammation and Steatosis as Compared to Liver Tissue Pathology Via Liver Biopsy
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Chronic liver diseases (CLDs), such as chronic viral hepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally and usually develops over many years. The prevalence of NAFLD has increased in recent years (15% in 2005 to 25% in 2010). As, approximately 20% of NAFLD cases develop NASH, the associated increase in NASH during the same period is to be expected (33% in 2005 to 59.1% in 2010).
The risk of liver-related mortality increases exponentially with increase in fibrosis stage. As the progression from NAFLD to NASH is associated with progressive liver fibrosis, the prognosis for NASH is worse than it is for NAFLD, and results in an increased risk of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and death from liver related causes. As a result, staging of liver fibrosis is essential in determining the prognosis and optimal treatment for patients with NASH. Furthermore, evaluation of fibrosis in NAFLD patients can help refine treatment options designed to prevent the progression to NASH. Currently, liver biopsy is the gold standard for staging liver fibrosis. However, liver biopsy is invasive, expensive and prone to sampling error. Developing, safe and easily accessible noninvasive modalities to accurately evaluate fibrosis stage of NAFLD and NASH is of utmost importance in clinical practice. The use of non-invasive biomarkers of liver fibrosis are needed in the general population setting.
LiverFASt is a non-invasive diagnostic and staging tool, which has been developed as an alternative to liver biopsy. It is a reliable, and reproducible tool which provides grading or staging of the three elementary features of NASH: steatosis, inflammatory activity and fibrosis. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of LiverFASt as a non-invasive biopsy-proven assessment of fatty liver disease.
Early liver disease detection allows patients treatment options for a healthier and productive life. Once liver disease progresses to cirrhosis or cancer, treatment options are limited and expensive. Reducing the almost $2Billion dollar liver disease economic burden to the United States, requires a breakthrough technology, which brings diagnosis to the patient.
Current liver disease diagnosis devices are dependent on fixed facilities, which utilize ultrasound, CT scan, MRI or biopsy sampling with pathology analysis. The dependency on fixed facility diagnostic procedures introduces barriers to patients receiving early detection. While it is known that early detection, wellness and cost effectiveness mitigate these realities, and many trends today in diagnostics are pushing greater early access to the patients, providers limit screening and detection to patients for which the procedure meets the cost-benefit in the ever-evolving value-based healthcare system. Additionally, requiring patients to travel to radiology or laboratory facilities introduces adherence issues.
Fibronostics breaks through the burden to serve patients. By empowering their providers with diagnostic tools within the clinic, the ability to ensure screening and diagnostic adherence is eliminated, and the ease for early detection profoundly shifts the $2B economic burden. For example, the Veterans Health Affairs estimates that 50,000 veterans a year are undiagnosed for Hep C.
Fibronostics diagnostic tool fits into a backpack, which allows a broader reach to underserved patients, and supports the Veterans Health Affairs Mobile Health Provider Program, which is designed to equip VA health care providers with technologies to deliver health care to Veterans homes. To date there is no liver diagnostic device which can serve the broad United States population and shift the growing economic burden.
Study Type
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Orlando, Florida, United States, 32817
- ObvioHealth
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18 to 80 years old, inclusive
- Male or Female
Liver patients who are scheduled to undergo, or have recently undergone, a medically indicated liver biopsy. Patients with a prior biopsy may be included under the following conditions:
- The biopsy was performed within the 3 months prior to enrollment
- A full report is available, including degree of Fibrosis, Activity and Steatosis or residual liver tissue is available for additional review.
Have a full component of biomarkers available for analysis from a blood sample obtained within 3 months of the date of the biopsy. Participants without a full component of biomarkers may be included if an additional sample for analysis of the missing biomarkers can be obtained within 3 months of the date of the biopsy.
- Required biomarkers include: α2-macroglobulin, haptoglobin, apolipoprotein A1, total bilirubin, y-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), triglycerides, cholesterol, and fasting glucose, collected within 3 months
- Willing and able to allow access to requested data and who were informed and signed the consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known psychiatric conditions
- Patients who may be uncooperative with the sample collection procedures
- Severe coagulopathy or infection of the hepatic bed
- Extrahepatic biliary obstruction
- Severe cardiovascular disease and/or renal failure
- Malignancy, except for resolved basal-cell carcinoma
- Previous liver transplant
- Suffering with a terminal illness or any other conditions or diseases that the investigator considers inappropriate for study participation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NAFLD
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Diagnostic performance of the LiverFASt Test for NAFLD resulting from liver biopsy based on percent diagnostic agreement using the thresholds of clinical significance outlined below.
|
Baseline
|
|
Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NAFLD
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Diagnostic performance of the LiverFASt Test for NAFLD resulting from liver biopsy based on percent diagnostic specificity using the thresholds of clinical significance outlined below.
|
Baseline
|
|
Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NAFLD
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Diagnostic performance of the LiverFASt Test for NAFLD resulting from liver biopsy based on percent diagnostic sensitivity using the thresholds of clinical significance outlined below.
|
Baseline
|
|
Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NAFLD
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Diagnostic performance of the LiverFASt Test for NAFLD resulting from liver biopsy based on percent diagnostic accuracy using the thresholds of clinical significance outlined below.
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NASH
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Diagnostic Performance of LiverFASt Test in NASH compared to histopathology
|
Baseline
|
|
Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NASH
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Performance of the test in determining the degree of Fibrosis, Activity and Steatosis compared to histopathology resulting from liver biopsy using percent composite score agreement
|
Baseline
|
|
Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NASH
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Performance of the test in determining the degree of Fibrosis, Activity and Steatosis compared to histopathology resulting from liver biopsy using diagnostic stage-specific percent agreement.
|
Baseline
|
|
Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NASH
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Performance of the test in determining the degree of Fibrosis, Activity and Steatosis compared to histopathology resulting from liver biopsy using deviation in individual composite score
|
Baseline
|
|
Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NASH
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Performance of the test in determining the degree of Fibrosis, Activity and Steatosis compared to histopathology resulting from liver biopsy using sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for a stage score basis
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Parth Shah, MD, OBVIO HEALTH USA, Inc.
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- OBVIO-FIB-001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on NAFLD
-
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterUnknown
-
Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research InstituteCompleted
-
The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal UniversityRecruitingNAFLD and NASH | NAFLD( Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease ) | NAFLD CirrhosisChina
-
Ziv HospitalUnknown
-
University of AthensLaikο General Hospital, AthensCompleted
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingNAFLD | Diet Habit
-
University of OxfordRecruitingNAFLD | Nutrient; ExcessUnited Kingdom
-
University of NottinghamNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustRecruitingNAFLD | Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease | Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) | NAFLD - Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease | NAFLD (Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease) | NAFLD (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease) | NAFLD - Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease | MASLD | Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated... and other conditionsUnited Kingdom
-
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, IncPharmaceutical Research AssociatesCompletedPresumptive NAFLDUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); Livivos...RecruitingNAFLD | NAFLD (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease) | MASLD | MASLD (Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease)United States
Clinical Trials on LiverFASt
-
Fibronostics USA, IncCompletedNon-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease | Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis | Liver Inflammation | Liver Fibroses | Liver SteatosesUnited States