Teenage Health and Wellness Study (THAW)

January 6, 2023 updated by: Diana Fishbein, Penn State University

Optimizing a Mindful Intervention for Urban Minority Youth Via Stress Physiology

This study evaluates the effects of mindfulness on physiological stress mechanisms implicated in externalizing behaviors and symptoms of affective and traumatic stress among urban adolescents. Program effects on stress physiology will be evaluated using pre- and post-tests of heart rate variability (HRV) during a stress task. Emotional and behavioral outcomes will be measured using student and teacher ratings.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Low-income urban adolescents experience high rates of adversity and trauma exposure, increasing their risk for stress-related problems, including externalizing behaviors and affective and traumatic stress symptoms. These outcomes are associated with dysregulated physiological responses to stress, both in the laboratory and real-world contexts. The neuroplasticity that typifies adolescence heightens vulnerability to stress effects on various brain and body systems. On the other hand, the same neurodevelopmental features also suggest pathways for overcoming and altering stymied trajectories through targeted interventions that leverage the brain's plasticity. Thus, adolescence affords a window of opportunity to reinforce parasympathetic modulation of stress responses, enhancing capacities for emotion regulation and, in effect, protecting against the development of behavioral and affective problems.

There is growing empirical support for the ability of mindfulness-based programs to improve stress management in adults, leading to improved well-being, coping and prosocial behavior. Evidence suggests that mindfulness influences homeostatic systems that modulate neurophysiological responses to stress in the service of emotion regulation. Indeed, neuroimaging studies in adults have established that mindfulness measurably improves brain function, demonstrating the alterability of these mechanisms. No such data have been collected for youth, nor have the psychophysiological mechanisms underlying mindfulness program effects for disadvantaged urban youth been rigorously evaluated. The proposed research thus has potential to substantively advance understanding of mindfulness mechanisms of effects and also to facilitate optimization of mindfulness programming so that it has maximum benefits for urban youth.

This study evaluates the effects of mindfulness on physiological stress mechanisms implicated in externalizing behaviors and symptoms of affective and traumatic stress among urban adolescents. Program effects on stress physiology will be evaluated using pre- and post-tests of heart rate variability (HRV) during a stress task. Emotional and behavioral outcomes will be measured using student and teacher ratings.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

203

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21202
        • Baltimore City Public Schools

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be in the 9th grade at one of the Baltimore City Public Schools participating in the study
  • Must provide parental permission and assent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students in foster care
  • Students in self-contained special education classrooms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: The Mind in Action
The Mind in Action is a mindfulness intervention developed by the Holistic Life Foundation (HLF), a Baltimore-based non-profit organization. The curriculum will be delivered over approximately 40 sessions and will follow HLF's typical program modifications for high school students (i.e., sustained focus on breath work and meditation). Each program session will include an initial exercise of focusing on the breath to center oneself, followed by the introduction and practice of different breathing techniques (e.g., rhythmic breathing) that enhance calmness and reduce physiological arousal, and concluding with a brief guided meditation. Instructors will describe benefits of the practices for health and stress management. Participants are given assignments between sessions to reinforce lessons (e.g., breathing exercises or periods of meditation).
Mindfulness program for adolescents
Active Comparator: Healthy Topics
Adapted from the Glencoe Health Curriculum (McGraw Hill), Healthy Topics is designed to control for the effects of a positive adult, time and attention, a small group learning environment, engaged instruction, and interesting material. The Healthy Topics curriculum has been successfully implemented as an effective active control condition, with student engagement and participation comparable to the intervention arm. The curriculum includes information about nutrition, exercise, sleep, drug use, and other topics related to physical health.
Health education program for adolescents

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate variability (HRV)
Time Frame: 25 minutes
HRV is a biomarker of neural regulation of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and reflects activity in the parasympathetic (PNS) division. HRV is perturbed by stress and can be altered long-term when adversity is prevalent. As such, it has been associated with symptoms of affective and traumatic stress disorders and externalizing behaviors. We will non-invasively monitor the reactivity of HRV using an earlobe sensor to index the PNS. Participants will complete the Trier Social Stress Task (TSST), which is a standard protocol for inducing moderate psychosocial stress in laboratory settings, and has been widely used with preadolescents and adolescents (Gunnar, Wewerka, Frenn, Long, & Griggs, 2009; Kirschbaum, Pirke, & Hellhammer, 1993). The protocol involves preparing and delivering a speech by the participant in the presence of an adult experimenter and while being videotaped. The trained research assistant is instructed to be as non-responsive as possible during the task.
25 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child Behavior Checklist:
Time Frame: 10 minutes
CBCL/4-18 has strong internal consistency and reliability. Considered the standard in field of child psychopathology.
10 minutes
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
Time Frame: 8 minutes
A 31-item teacher-rated measure assessing aspects of students' social-emotional functioning. We will administer scales for dysregulation and social-emotional competence (13 items total).
8 minutes
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System
Time Frame: 6 minutes
PROMIS is well established and widely used. Includes Depression, Anxiety, Emotional and Behavioral Dyscontrol, Sleep Disturbance, Well Being and Cognitive Function Scales for pediatric samples, from 8-17.
6 minutes
Child PTSD Symptom Scale
Time Frame: 3 minutes
The CPSS (Foa et al., 2001), which is a 25-item measure of trauma symptoms that has been shown to have good reliability and validity in Baltimore City youth, and has been used in prior studies conducted in Baltimore City public schools.
3 minutes
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 minutes
ERQ has 10 items rated on 7-point scale tap individual differences in habitual use of 2 emotion regulation strategies: cognitive reappraisal & expressive suppression (α = .69)
3 minutes
Background Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 minutes
Gender, household income, ethnicity/race, mental health treatment received, coping, diet, sleep patterns, etc.
3 minutes
Youth Risk Behavior Survey
Time Frame: 10 minutes
The YRBS (CDC 2015) includes substance use items, which includes 4 items measuring lifetime use of alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana.
10 minutes
Brief COPE
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Brief COPE (Carver, 1997), a 28-item measure of various coping skills, including both adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies.
5 minutes
Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: 3 minutes
Perceived Stress Scale: 12 items modified from NIH toolbox (e.g. felt nervous and stressed; able to control irritations). α = 0.89
3 minutes
Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure
Time Frame: 3 minutes
Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) (Greco et al., 2011), a brief (10-item) measure of mindfulness that has been found to be reliable and valid in a sample of Baltimore City adolescents. This measure would be given at baseline and post-program, as well as the midpoint of the intervention.
3 minutes
Adverse Childhood Experiences Checklist
Time Frame: 3 minutes
Adverse Childhood Experiences Checklist (ACEs) (Felitti et al., 1998), a brief (8-item) checklist of trauma exposures adapted from a longer version to exclude items that would require reporting.
3 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tamar Mendelson, PhD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
  • Principal Investigator: Diana Fishbein, PhD, Penn State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 22, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R61AT009856 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress

Clinical Trials on The Mind in Action

Subscribe