- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03990168
The Effect of the Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on the Speech Fluency Enhancement
November 5, 2020 updated by: Moin, Iran University of Medical Sciences
The Effect of the Combined Treatment Approach of Delayed Auditory Feedback and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Enhancement of Speech Fluency in Adults Who Stutter
The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of concurrent transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and fluency training in adults with developmental stuttering.
We examine the severity of stuttering to investigate the effect of treatnment.
In the control group the anodal tDCS and DAF will applied on six consecutive days (1 milliampere [mA] for 20 mins per day), and the control group will received the sham stimulation and DAF for the same time.
The severity of stuttering measured by means of tasks and questionnaires before and after treatment sessions and 6 weeks after intervention.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
50
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of, 1545913487
- Narges Moin
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years to 48 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- History of developmental stuttering
- Participants diagnosed with moderate to severe stuttering
- Right handed
- Native speaker of Farsi
Exclusion Criteria:
- Speech or language disorders other than stuttering
- Received stuttering treatment within the past year
- Hearing loss
- History of neurological or psychiatric disorders
- History of seizure
- Taking any medication that may affect brain function such as anti-depressants
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Experimental
Participants will receive one anodal tDCS at 1 mA intensity over the left superior temporal gyrus (T3 in 10-20 international system) and the cathode tDCS over the right orbitofrontal area (Fp2 in 10-20 international system).
tDCS will be delivered for 20 minutes during fluency intervention for six consecutive days.
|
1 mA anodal tDCS positioned over left superior temporal gyrus and the cathode placed over the occipital lobe.
The tDCS stimulation will be delivered for 20 minutes on 6 intervention days.
Each participant complete three tasks include reading, conversation, and narration.
Delayed auditory feedback will be used during these tasks.
Each treatment session will take 20 minutes.
|
Sham Comparator: Sham Comparator
Participants will receive sham tDCS while the one anode electrode will be positioned over the left superior temporal gyrus and the cathode will be placed over the right orbitofrontal similar to the active mode.
The sham stimulation will break down after 30 seconds at the beginning of 20 minutes of fluency intervention for six consecutive days.
|
Each participant complete three tasks include reading, conversation, and narration.
Delayed auditory feedback will be used during these tasks.
Each treatment session will take 20 minutes.
The anodal tDCS positioned over left superior temporal gyrus and the cathode placed over the occipital lobe.
The current of sham stimulation will involve 30 seconds of stimulation at the beginning of the 20 minutes on 6 intervention days.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean score of percentage of Stuttered Syllables produced in the speech sample
Time Frame: Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment
|
Researcher will calculate the Percentage of Stuttered Syllables (SS %) in the speech sample.
Lower percentage of Stuttered Syllables represents better outcomes.
|
Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean score of the Stuttering Severity Instrument version 4 (SSI-4)
Time Frame: Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment
|
The Stuttering Severity Instrument (SSI-4) is a standardized measure of stuttering severity consist of of 3 subscales (frequency, duration and physical concomitants) which are summed to give a total score.
The maximum total score of the SSI-4 is 56, which corresponds to the highest stuttering severity.
So, lower score represents better outcomes.
|
Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment
|
Mean score of the Overall Assessment of Speakers Experience of Stuttering (OASES)
Time Frame: Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment
|
The OASES is a standardized assessment to measure the effect of stuttering on a person's life that consists of 4 subscales (general information about speech, your reactions to stuttering, communication in daily situations, quality of life).
Each sub-test has a score from 1 to 5 in which the number 1 indicates the least negative impact and number 5 shows the most negative impact.
These are combined to give a total impact score between 1 and 5, with 5 representing the highest negative impact on person's life.
So, higher score represents better outcomes.
|
Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Director: Reyhane Mohamadi, Iran University of Medical Sciences
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 1, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 16, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
June 18, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 9, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 5, 2020
Last Verified
November 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 98-2-75-15001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Undecided
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stuttering/ Developmental
-
University of Texas at AustinRecruitingStuttering | Stuttering, Childhood | Stuttering, Adult | Stuttering, DevelopmentalUnited States
-
University of OxfordCompletedStuttering, DevelopmentalUnited Kingdom
-
HaEmek Medical Center, IsraelRecruitingPersistent Developmental StutteringIsrael
-
Endo PharmaceuticalsCompletedPersistent Developmental StutteringUnited States
-
Thomas More University of Applied SciencesUniversity of Liege; Universiteit Antwerpen; Artevelde University of Applied...RecruitingStuttering, DevelopmentalBelgium
-
University of MichiganTerminated
-
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication...Completed
-
Alaa MamdouhRecruitingDevelopmental Stuttering | Evoked Potentials AuditoryEgypt
-
Pharmacology Research InstituteCompletedPersistent Developmental StutteringUnited States
-
Arizona State UniversityUniversity of Washington; National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication...RecruitingHealthy Subjects | Stuttering, DevelopmentalUnited States
Clinical Trials on Anodal tDCS
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
University of WaterlooThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRecruitingMacular DegenerationHong Kong, Canada
-
University of WaterlooThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityCompleted
-
University of MiamiActive, not recruiting
-
Hospital Ernesto DornellesUnknown
-
University of LiegeCompletedDisorders of Consciousness | Minimally Conscious State | Vegetative StateBelgium
-
University of TromsoHelse NordCompleted
-
University of LiegeCompletedDisorder of Consciousness | Minimally Conscious State | Vegetative StateBelgium
-
University of LiegeCompletedDisorders of Consciousness | Minimally Conscious State | Vegetative StateBelgium
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedMotor Activity | Motor NeuroplasticityUnited States