The Effect of the Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on the Speech Fluency Enhancement

November 5, 2020 updated by: Moin, Iran University of Medical Sciences

The Effect of the Combined Treatment Approach of Delayed Auditory Feedback and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Enhancement of Speech Fluency in Adults Who Stutter

The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of concurrent transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and fluency training in adults with developmental stuttering. We examine the severity of stuttering to investigate the effect of treatnment. In the control group the anodal tDCS and DAF will applied on six consecutive days (1 milliampere [mA] for 20 mins per day), and the control group will received the sham stimulation and DAF for the same time. The severity of stuttering measured by means of tasks and questionnaires before and after treatment sessions and 6 weeks after intervention.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 48 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of developmental stuttering
  • Participants diagnosed with moderate to severe stuttering
  • Right handed
  • Native speaker of Farsi

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Speech or language disorders other than stuttering
  • Received stuttering treatment within the past year
  • Hearing loss
  • History of neurological or psychiatric disorders
  • History of seizure
  • Taking any medication that may affect brain function such as anti-depressants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental
Participants will receive one anodal tDCS at 1 mA intensity over the left superior temporal gyrus (T3 in 10-20 international system) and the cathode tDCS over the right orbitofrontal area (Fp2 in 10-20 international system). tDCS will be delivered for 20 minutes during fluency intervention for six consecutive days.
1 mA anodal tDCS positioned over left superior temporal gyrus and the cathode placed over the occipital lobe. The tDCS stimulation will be delivered for 20 minutes on 6 intervention days.
Each participant complete three tasks include reading, conversation, and narration. Delayed auditory feedback will be used during these tasks. Each treatment session will take 20 minutes.
Sham Comparator: Sham Comparator
Participants will receive sham tDCS while the one anode electrode will be positioned over the left superior temporal gyrus and the cathode will be placed over the right orbitofrontal similar to the active mode. The sham stimulation will break down after 30 seconds at the beginning of 20 minutes of fluency intervention for six consecutive days.
Each participant complete three tasks include reading, conversation, and narration. Delayed auditory feedback will be used during these tasks. Each treatment session will take 20 minutes.
The anodal tDCS positioned over left superior temporal gyrus and the cathode placed over the occipital lobe. The current of sham stimulation will involve 30 seconds of stimulation at the beginning of the 20 minutes on 6 intervention days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean score of percentage of Stuttered Syllables produced in the speech sample
Time Frame: Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment
Researcher will calculate the Percentage of Stuttered Syllables (SS %) in the speech sample. Lower percentage of Stuttered Syllables represents better outcomes.
Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean score of the Stuttering Severity Instrument version 4 (SSI-4)
Time Frame: Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment
The Stuttering Severity Instrument (SSI-4) is a standardized measure of stuttering severity consist of of 3 subscales (frequency, duration and physical concomitants) which are summed to give a total score. The maximum total score of the SSI-4 is 56, which corresponds to the highest stuttering severity. So, lower score represents better outcomes.
Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment
Mean score of the Overall Assessment of Speakers Experience of Stuttering (OASES)
Time Frame: Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment
The OASES is a standardized assessment to measure the effect of stuttering on a person's life that consists of 4 subscales (general information about speech, your reactions to stuttering, communication in daily situations, quality of life). Each sub-test has a score from 1 to 5 in which the number 1 indicates the least negative impact and number 5 shows the most negative impact. These are combined to give a total impact score between 1 and 5, with 5 representing the highest negative impact on person's life. So, higher score represents better outcomes.
Baselines, immediately post-treatment, 1-week post-treatment, 6-weeks post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Reyhane Mohamadi, Iran University of Medical Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stuttering/ Developmental

Clinical Trials on Anodal tDCS

3
Subscribe